[Lifestyle: physical activity and training as prevetion and therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (Update 2019)]. / Lebensstil: körperliche Aktivität und Training in der Prävention und Therapie des Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus (Update 2019).

Lifestyle in general and particularly health enhancing physical activity is known to be an important component in the prevention and therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus.To gain substantial health benefits a minimum of 150 min of moderate or vigorous intense aerobic physical activity and muscle strengthening activities per week are needed. Additionally, inactivity should be recognised as health hazard and prolonged episodes of sitting should be avoided.Exercise in particular is not only useful in improving glycaemia by lowering insulin resistance and positively affect insulin secretion, but to reduce cardiovascular risk. The positive effect of training correlates directly with the amount of fitness gained and lasts only as long as the fitness level is sustained. The effect of exercise is independent of age and gender. It is reversible and reproducible.Supervised exercise classes are well known to be attractive for adults to reach a sufficient level of health enhancing physical activity. The potential of regional, standardised exercise programmes could have been shown, although existing barriers to entry must be reduced. To tackle this public health challenge and based on the large evidence of exercise referral and prescription the Austrian Diabetes Associations aims to implement the position of a "physical activity adviser" in multi-professional diabetes care.

Cost calculation for a flash glucose monitoring system for UK adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving intensive insulin treatment.

AIMS: To estimate the costs associated with a flash glucose monitoring system as a replacement for routine self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using intensive insulin, from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. METHODS: The base-case cost calculation was created using the maximum frequency of glucose monitoring recommended by the 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (4-10 tests per day). Scenario analyses considered SMBG at the frequency observed in the IMPACT clinical trial (5.6 tests per day) and at the frequency of flash monitoring observed in a real-world analysis (16 tests per day). A further scenario included potential costs associated with severe hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: In the base case, the annual cost per patient using flash monitoring was £234 (19%) lower compared with routine SMBG (10 tests per day). In scenario analyses, the annual cost per patient of flash monitoring compared with 5.6 and 16 SMBG tests per day was £296 higher and £957 lower, respectively. The annual cost of severe hypoglycaemia for flash monitoring users was estimated to be £221 per patient, compared with £428 for routine SMBG users (based on 5.6 tests/day), corresponding to a reduction in costs of £207. CONCLUSIONS: The flash monitoring system has a modest impact on glucose monitoring costs for the UK NHS for patients with T1DM using intensive insulin. For people requiring frequent tests, flash monitoring may be cost saving, especially when taking into account potential reductions in the rate of severe hypoglycaemia.

Quality of diabetes care in Austrian diabetic patients willing to participate in a DMP - at baseline.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus type 2 plays an important role in population health worldwide, and diabetes care has been shown to be insufficient. Disease management programmes (DMPs) have been designed to overcome these deficiencies, but data on their effectiveness are inconclusive. One reason for the inconsistent extent of effects may be selection bias. Voluntary programmes might recruit preferably highly motivated patients who are already quite successful in managing diabetes. Other programmes enrol primarily patients with poor metabolic control which may lead to the demonstration of fairly large effects due to regression to the mean. We therefore investigated the baseline characteristics of patients willing to enrol in the Austrian DMP for diabetes mellitus type 2 ("Therapie aktiv"), and their quality of care. METHODS: We offered the study to all GPs and internists in the province of Salzburg. The physicians were asked to recruit all patients with type 2 diabetes according to WHO/ADA-criteria willing to participate in the Austrian DMP "Therapie aktiv". For all patients, data regarding metabolic control, medication, cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes complications were recorded and then analysed to detect deficiencies in care. RESULTS: One thousand Four hundred and eighty-nine patients (mean age 65.4 ± 10.4 years; 47.8% women) were recruited by 92 physicians. 24.3% of all participants (28.3% of the men and 20.1% of the women) had at least one diabetes-related complication with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular complications in the male study population. 80.7% of all patients were treated with oral antidiabetics, insulin or both. With regards to quality of care 5% of all patients with an HbA1c above 7.5% did not receive any antidiabetic medication at all. 15.3% of the study population with high blood pressure was not supplied with any antihypertensive medication and 36.6% of the study participants with cardiovascular disease were not treated with a statin. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the majority of the patients receive treatment in adherence to current guidelines. Nevertheless there are deficits in care and hence room for improvement by implementation of the DMP.