Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 1119, 2022 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36319973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in North America. Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer (CC) reduces cancer recurrence, but also causes significant toxicity requiring dose reductions. The effect of dose intensity on survival outcomes is not fully understood and strengthening the evidence supports informed decision making between patients and oncologists. METHODS: Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, between 2006 and 2011, for resected colon cancer at four Canadian academic cancer centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients must have received oxaliplatin with either capecitabine (CAPOX) or 5-FU (FOLFOX). Dose intensity (DI) was calculated as total delivered dose of an individual chemotherapy agent divided by the cumulative intended dose of that agent. The influence of DI on overall survival was examined. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-one patients with high-risk stage II or stage III resected CC were eligible and included in the analysis. FOLFOX was the most common regimen (69.6%) with 29.7% of patients receiving CAPOX and 0.7% receiving both therapies. Median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median DI for 5-FU and capecitabine was 100% and 100% with 13.6% and 9.8% of patients receiving ≤ 80% DI, respectively. The median DI of oxaliplatin was 70% with 56.8% of patients receiving ≤ 80% DI. A DI of > 80% for each chemotherapy component was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival compared to those with a DI of ≤ 80% (5-FU HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.08-0.65, p = 0.006; capecitabine HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.33-0.94, p = 0.026; oxaliplatin HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.33-0.82, p = 0.005). Patients with T2 and/or N2 disease with an oxaliplatin DI > 80% had a trend towards improved survival (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.38-1.02, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In resected CC an adjuvant chemotherapy DI of > 80%, of each chemotherapy agent, is associated with improved overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Capecitabina , Oxaliplatino , Leucovorina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Compuestos Organoplatinos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Canadá , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Fluorouracilo , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Curr Oncol ; 28(5): 4031-4041, 2021 10 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34677260

RESUMEN

There is evidence that achieving a dose intensity > 80% in adjuvant colon cancer treatment improves survival. In total, 192 consecutive patients with resected stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer that received adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received at least 6 weeks of adjuvant therapy were included. The primary objective was to assess the influence of dose index (DI) and relative dose intensity (RDI) on DFS and OS at 3 and 5 years in patients receiving fluorouracil-based doublet therapy with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (5-FU and oxaliplatin assessed separately), or capecitabine monotherapy. In the capecitabine group, DFS rates for 3 and 5 years were 66.7% and 57.6%, respectively, while OS rates were 80.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Those who received FOLFOX had DFS rates of 76.9% and 71.2% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. OS rates were 86.4% and 76.7% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Median RDI was 73.8% for capecitabine and 76.3% and 85.6% for the oxaliplatin and 5-FU components respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis in patients receiving FOLFOX, those with an oxaliplatin DI > 80% had improvements in DFS and OS compared to those with an oxaliplatin DI of ≤80%. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS when comparing patients who achieved an RDI or a DI of above versus below 80% in the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Compuestos Organoplatinos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Infect Dis ; 221(Supplement_4): S480-S492, 2020 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037447

RESUMEN

Nipah virus (NiV) is a highly pathogenic zoonotic paramyxovirus that causes fatal encephalitis and respiratory disease in humans. There is currently no approved therapeutic for human use against NiV infection. Griffithsin (GRFT) is high-mannose oligosaccharide binding lectin that has shown in vivo broad-spectrum activity against viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human immunodeficiency virus 1, hepatitis C virus, and Japanese encephalitis virus. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro antiviral activities of GRFT and its synthetic trimeric tandemer (3mG) against NiV and other viruses from 4 virus families. The 3mG had comparatively greater potency than GRFT against NiV due to its enhanced ability to block NiV glycoprotein-induced syncytia formation. Our initial in vivo prophylactic evaluation of an oxidation-resistant GRFT (Q-GRFT) showed significant protection against lethal NiV challenge in Syrian golden hamsters. Our results warrant further development of Q-GRFT and 3mG as potential NiV therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/farmacología , Infecciones por Henipavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Virus Nipah/efectos de los fármacos , Lectinas de Plantas/farmacología , Internalización del Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Chlorocebus aethiops , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Femenino , Células HEK293 , Células HeLa , Infecciones por Henipavirus/virología , Humanos , Mesocricetus , Virus Nipah/aislamiento & purificación , Lectinas de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Células Vero
4.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 20(5): 787-93, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20847613

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Antiangiogenic strategies have demonstrated efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Sorafenib is a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Gemcitabine has known activity against EOC. A phase 1 clinical trial of this combination suggested activity in ovarian cancer with no dose-limiting toxicity. This phase 2 study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and sorafenib in patients with recurrent EOC. METHODS: Patients with recurrent EOC after platinum-based chemotherapy and who had subsequently received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m intravenous [IV]) was administered weekly for 7 of 8 weeks in the first cycle, then weekly for 3 weeks of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Sorafenib (400 mg p.o. bid) was given continuously. The primary end point for this trial was objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 response, time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled, and 33 completed at least 1 cycle. Two patients had a partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors objective response rate = 4.7%). Ten patients (23.3%) maintained response or stable disease for at least 6 months. GCIG CA-125 response was 27.9%. The median time to progression was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.0 months. Hematologic toxicity was common but manageable. The most common nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: This trial of gemcitabine and sorafenib in recurrent EOC did not meet its primary efficacy end point, but the combination was associated with encouraging rates of prolonged stable disease and CA-125 response.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Bencenosulfonatos/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gemcitabina
5.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 45(2): 183-7, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19387519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Personality traits are reported to be associated with a variety of medical comorbidities. Correlational studies report an association between 'bearing grudges' and medical conditions. We hypothesize persons reporting "bearing grudges for years" would be more likely to have medical comorbidities and test this hypothesis in an epidemiological sample. METHODS: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication is a probability sample of the US population designed to constitute a nationally representative sample (N = 9,882). Associations were measured in odds ratios (95% CI) and adjusted using logistic regression. Confounders included: gender, age, race, and smoking status. We tested the hypothesis on 14 following medical conditions: heart disease, high blood pressure, history of heart attack, asthma, diabetes, cancer, epilepsy, arthritis, neck problems, headaches, stroke, and ulcers. Significance levels were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferoni procedure. RESULTS: Positive and statistically significant associations were found, after adjusting for confounders and correcting for multiple comparisons, between bearing grudges and history of heart attack (odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9) and disease (1.6, 1.2-2.2); high blood pressure (1.5, 1.3-1.7), stomach ulcers (1.6, 1.3-1.9); arthritis (1.5, 1.3-1.9); back problems (1.6, 1.4-1.8); headaches (1.8, 1.6-2.1); and chronic pain (1.7, 1.4-2.1). No association was found with history of asthma, diabetes, epilepsy, allergies, stroke, and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based survey, bearing grudges is associated with a history of pain disorders, cardiovascular disease, and stomach ulcers. These results point to the importance of psychosomatic research in medical settings.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Personalidad/clasificación , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Hostilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Psicosomática , Factores de Riesgo , Muestreo , Trastornos Somatomorfos/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA