Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 432, 2021 Nov 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34740330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the sensitivity of median and ulnar nerve sensory latency differences in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) at different severities. METHODS: CTS patients were divided into three groups based on disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe). Distal latency of sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) for the median and ulnar nerves was recorded. The sensitivity of SNAP distal latency to CTS and its correlation with CTS severity were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the median nerve sensory action potential distal latency (MSDL) and in the median and ulnar sensory latency difference to ring finger (MUD) but not in the ulnar nerve sensory action potential distal latency (USDL) between CTS and control. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.2 and 99.4% with an MSDL cutoff value of 2.40 ms, respectively, and were both 100% with a MUD cutoff value of 0.33 ms. There was no significant difference in USDL among the CTS and control groups. Significant differences were found in MSDL and MUD among the CTS severities and between mild and moderate CTS, but not between mild and severe CTS or between moderate and severe CTS. Correlations with CTS severity were observed for MSDL and MUD but not for USDL. CONCLUSION: The ulnar nerve of the CTS patients was not damaged. A smaller MSDL reflected median nerve damage, which can be used for the early diagnosis of CTS. MUD correlated with CTS severity with a higher sensitivity than MSDL, which can provide therapeutic insight without pain to patients.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/terapia , Dedos , Humanos , Nervio Mediano , Conducción Nerviosa , Nervio Cubital
2.
J Nutr ; 145(2): 291-8, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25644350

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies in humans have shown associations between greater sunlight exposure, higher serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D3] concentrations, and reduced colon cancer risk. However, results from a limited number of vitamin D supplementation trials in humans have not shown a protective effect. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether adding to the diet increasing amounts of either 25(OH)D3, the stable metabolite measured in serum and associated with cancer risk, or cholecalciferol (vitamin D3), the compound commonly used for supplementation in humans, could reduce emergent adenomas (chemoprevention) or decrease the growth of existing adenomas (treatment) in the colons of vitamin D-sufficient rats carrying a truncation mutation of adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc), a model of early intestinal cancer. METHODS: Apc(Pirc/+) rats were supplemented with either vitamin D3 over a range of 4 doses [6-1500 µg/(kg body weight · d)] or with 25(OH)D3 over a range of 6 doses [60-4500 µg/(kg body weight · d)] beginning after weaning. Rats underwent colonoscopy every other week to assess effects on adenoma number and size. At termination (140 d of age), the number of tumors in the small intestine and colon and the size of tumors in the colon were determined, and serum calcium and 25(OH)D3 measurements were obtained. RESULTS: At lower doses (those that did not affect body weight), neither of the vitamin D compounds reduced the number of existing or emergent colonic tumors (P-trend > 0.24). By contrast, supplementation at higher doses (those that caused a suppression in body weight gain) with either 25(OH)D3 or vitamin D3 caused a dose-dependent increase in colonic tumor number in both males and females (P-trend < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence for protection against colon tumor development was seen with lower dose supplementation with either cholecalciferol or 25-hydroxycholecalciferol. Thus, the association between sunlight exposure and the incidence of colon cancer may involve factors other than vitamin D concentrations. Alternative hypotheses warrant investigation. Furthermore, this study provides preliminary evidence for the need for caution regarding vitamin D supplementation of humans at higher doses, especially in individuals with sufficient serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenoma/prevención & control , Calcifediol/farmacología , Colecalciferol/farmacología , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/prevención & control , Animales , Calcifediol/sangre , Calcio de la Dieta/sangre , Colecalciferol/sangre , Colon/efectos de los fármacos , Colon/metabolismo , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Masculino , Ratas , Ratas Endogámicas F344 , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA