Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Laryngoscope ; 127 Suppl 6: S1-S13, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28842999

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common. A majority of the patients respond to acid suppression. This work intends to evaluate once-daily, 40 mg omeprazole and once-nightly, 300 mg ranitidine (QD/QHS) dosing as an alternative regimen, and use this study's cohort to evaluate empiric regimens prescribed for LPR as compared to up-front testing with pH impedance multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) with dual pH probes and high-resolution manometry (HRM) for potential cost minimization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review and cost minimization study. METHODS: A chart review identified patients diagnosed with LPR. All subjects were treated sequentially and outcomes recorded. Initial QD/QHS dosing increased after 3 months to BID if no improvement and ultimately prescribed MII and HRM if they failed BID dosing. Decision tree diagrams were constructed to determine costs of two empiric regimens and up-front MII and HRM. RESULTS: Ninety-seven subjects met the criteria. Responders and nonresponders to empiric therapy were identified. Seventy-two subjects (74%) responded. Forty-eight (67% of responders and 49% of all) improved with QD/QHS dosing. Forty-nine (51%) subjects escalated to BID dosing. Twenty-four subjects (33% of responders and 25% of all) improved on BID therapy. Twenty-five subjects (26%) did not respond to acid suppression. Average weighted cost was $1,897.00 per patient for up-front testing, $3,033.00 for initial BID, and $3,366.00 for initial QD/QHS. CONCLUSIONS: An alternate QD/QHS regimen improved the majority who presented with presumed LPR. Cost estimates demonstrate that the QD/QHS regimen was more expensive than the initial BID high-dose PPI for 6 months. Overall per-patient cost appears less with up-front MII and HRM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:S1-S13, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Monitorización del pH Esofágico/economía , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/tratamiento farmacológico , Manometría/economía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Antiulcerosos/economía , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Impedancia Eléctrica , Monitorización del pH Esofágico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/economía , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/fisiopatología , Masculino , Manometría/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Omeprazol/economía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/economía , Ranitidina/administración & dosificación , Ranitidina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA