Contemporary results of carotid endarterectomy in "normal-risk" patients from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Acceptable complication rates after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are drawn from decades-old data. The recent Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) demonstrated improved stroke and mortality outcomes after CEA compared with carotid artery stenting, with 30-day periprocedural CEA stroke rates of 3.2% and 1.4% for symptomatic (SX) and asymptomatic (ASX) patients, respectively. It is unclear whether these target rates can be attained in "normal-risk" (NR) patients experienced outside of the trial. This study was done to determine the contemporary results of CEA from a broader selection of NR patients. METHODS: The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Registry was examined to determine in-hospital and 30-day event rates for NR, SX, and ASX patients undergoing CEA. NR was defined as patients without anatomic or physiologic risk factors as defined by SVS Carotid Practice Guidelines. Raw data and risk-adjusted rates of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) were compared between the ASX and SX cohorts. RESULTS: There were 3977 patients (1456 SX, 2521 ASX) available for comparison. The SX group consisted of more men (61.7% vs 57.0%; P = .0045) but reflected a lower proportion of white patients (91.3% vs 94.4%; P = .0002), with lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (P < .0001), prior MI (P < .0001), peripheral vascular disease (P = .0017), and hypertension (P = .029), although New York Heart Association grade >3 congestive heart failure was equally present in both groups (P = .30). Baseline stenosis >80% on duplex imaging was less prevalent among SX patients (54.2% vs 67.8%; P < .0001). Perioperative stroke rates were higher for SX patients in the hospital (2.8% vs 0.8%; P < .0001) and at 30 days (3.4% vs 1.0%; P < .0001), which contributed to the higher composite death, stroke, and MI rates in the hospital (3.6% vs 1.8; P = .0003) and at 30 days (4.5% vs 2.2%; P < .0001) observed in SX patients. After risk adjustment, the rate of stroke/death was greater among SX patients in the hospital (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.58) although not at 30 days (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-2.17). No in-hospital or 30-day differences were observed for death or MI by symptom status. CONCLUSIONS: The SVS Vascular Registry results for CEA in NR patients are similar by symptom status to those reported for CREST and may serve as a benchmark for comparing results of alternative therapies for treatment of carotid stenosis in NR patients outside of monitored clinical trials. The contemporary perioperative risk of stroke after CEA in NR patients continues to be higher for SX than for ASX patients.

High-dose adenosine-induced asystole assisting accurate deployment of thoracic stent grafts in conscious patients.

Adenosine has been used to induce asystole and assist deployment of endoluminal grafts. However, application of high-dose adenosine in conscious patients has not been described. In this prospective study, we administered high-dose adenosine in patients undergoing thoracic stent grafting. Asystole duration in relationship to the dosage of adenosine, safety, and side effect profiles was investigated. All patients who underwent thoracic stent grafting between 1998 and 2006 were the potential study subjects. They received monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia unless contraindicated. Adenosine was given via rapid intravenous bolus immediately prior to the deployment of the stent graft. Every patient received a dose of 36 mg. If needed, a second dose of 18 mg was given. Duration of asystole was recorded after each administration. Patients' vital signs before and after administration were also documented. Side effect profiles were collected intra- and postoperatively. A total of 46 patients received adenosine (34 men, 12 women). Mean age was 60.4 +/- 17.5 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were II in one patient (2%), III in six patients (13%), and IV in 39 patients (85%). Eighteen patients received a single dose of 36 mg adenosine, 15 were given a second dose of 18 mg, and 13 received nonstandard dosages. Asystole durations were 18.8 +/- 8.8 and 11.6 +/- 5.5 sec for 36 and 18 mg, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all cases. The differences achieved statistical significance (p = 0.0009). There were no severe cardiac or pulmonary complications. High-dose adenosine can be given safely in conscious patients. The dose-response was predictable and reproducible. The dosages used in our study induce sufficient duration of asystole, which ensured accurate deployment of thoracic stent grafts.