Dual- Versus Mono-Bronchodilator Therapy in Moderate to Severe COPD: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines recommend both long-acting and dual bronchodilator therapy. It is unclear if there are differences in efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of dual therapy with long-acting ß-agonist (LABA) + long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) compared with monotherapy with LAMA for COPD. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from inception through March 2020 to identify English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared dual therapy with monotherapy in adult patients with COPD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Jadad score. Overall analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Treatment effect was determined with the random-effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel method and was reported as mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs were included (n = 6086; median Jadad score 5/5) that compared LAMA + LABA with LAMA. There was a greater improvement in forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) with dual therapy compared with LAMA: MD = 0.08; 95% CI = [0.05, 0.11]. There was no difference in St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores between groups: OR = -0.85; 95% CI = [-1.83, 0.13]. There were no differences in overall adverse events (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.92, 1.09), serious adverse events (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.86, 1.18), or cardiovascular events (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.58, 1.34). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Dual therapy improves FEV1 and is as safe as LAMA. Dual therapy does not improve SGRQ scores more than LAMA.

Efficacy of Capsaicin for the Treatment of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is characterized by cyclic vomiting, abdominal pain, and alleviation of symptoms via hot showers in chronic cannabinoid users. Capsaicin is recommended as a reasonable first-line treatment approach for CHS despite limited clinical evidence regarding its use. The objective of this study is to systematically review the efficacy data for capsaicin in CHS. Data Sources: A literature search using keywords related to cannabinoids, emesis, and capsaicin was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE from inception through March 31, 2019. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies and published abstracts in which capsaicin was used for CHS and clinical outcomes were reported were eligible for inclusion. Data Synthesis: A total of 241 articles were screened, of which 5 full-text articles and 6 conference abstracts were included. Full-text case reports (n = 3) and case series (n = 2) found capsaicin to be effective in a total of 18 patients. Published abstracts were in the form of case reports (n = 1), case series (n = 3), and retrospective cohort studies (n = 2). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Capsaicin use was described as beneficial in all case series and case reports; however, both retrospective cohort studies were unable to find a significant benefit for capsaicin on primary outcomes (emergency department length of stay). Conclusion: Current data for capsaicin efficacy in CHS is of low methodological quality. However, the limited data on alternative antiemetic therapies and capsaicin's favorable risk-benefit profile make it a reasonable adjunctive treatment option.

Pharmacotherapy in Acutely Anemic Jehovah's Witnesses: An Evidence-Based Review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacological treatment methods available to anemic Jehovah's Witnesses (JW). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception through February 2018 using the search terms Jehovah's Witnesses, treatment, erythropoietin, hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier, Sanguinate, Hemopure, bleeding, and anemia. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and observational trials involving pharmacotherapy in anemic JW patients were evaluated. Case reports and bibliographies were also analyzed for inclusion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two studies involving the use of erythropoietin (EPO) and one study involving recombinant factor VIIa were included. Information was also included from other pharmacotherapeutic modalities that had case report data only. Current published evidence is limited with regard to evidence-based management of JW patients. High-dose EPO, intravenous iron supplementation, and hemostatic agents have demonstrated good clinical outcomes in case reports. EPO doses as high as 40 000 units daily have been advocated by some experts; however, pharmacokinetic studies do not support dose-dependent effects. Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) are currently not Food and Drug Administration approved. They are available through expanded access programs and may represent a lifesaving modality in the setting of severe anemia. CONCLUSIONS: There are currently not enough data to make definitive recommendations on the use of pharmacological agents to treat severe anemia in the JW population. Further evidence utilizing EPO and HBOCs will be beneficial to guide therapy.

The role of antimicrobials in Crohn's disease.

This review summarizes literature regarding the role of antimicrobials for induction and maintenance of Crohn's disease (CD) remission. PubMed was searched (1966 to October 2012) for controlled trials involving adults and written in English. Five of the 13 identified studies showed benefit with the use of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and rifaximin for induction of remission. Eight studies showed no benefit using ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, combination of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin or clarithromycin and rifaximin. Four of the five studies showed benefit based on colonic location. Perianal CD with draining fistulas responded in one of two studies. Two studies in postileocolonic resection demonstrated benefit of metronidazole or ornidazole in reducing CD recurrence. Antimicrobials, especially metronidazole, are promising for inducing remission in patients with colonic CD and preventing recurrence in postileocolonic resection.

Implementation of an inpatient anticoagulation teaching service: expanding the role of pharmacy students and residents in patient education.

PURPOSE: The implementation of and early experience with an anticoagulation teaching service managed by pharmacy students and residents are described. SUMMARY: A structured anticoagulation teaching program was established to improve the provision of education services to inpatients scheduled for discharge home on anticoagulant therapy (consistent with the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal 03.05.01). The program served patients at three affiliated institutions and was designed to supplement pharmacists' usual anticoagulation education activities. After completing supervised training in anticoagulation education and documentation procedures, pharmacy students and residents on rotation at the facilities staffed the service three days per week for five hours per day. In the first five months of operation, the teaching service significantly increased the rate of anticoagulation patient education (to 59.2%, compared with 39.1% during a specified five-month preimplementation period; p < 0.0001). Among patients educated through the teaching service, 60-day readmission rates for both anticoagulation-related and nonanticoagulation-related problems were lower than readmission rates among patients not receiving the structured education services. CONCLUSION: Implementing an anticoagulation teaching service provided by pharmacy students and residents significantly increased the rate of patient education and lowered readmission rates.

A review of infliximab use in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric immunoglobulin G1kappa monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and specificity to the soluble form of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, preventing it from binding to cellular receptors. Infliximab also binds to membranebound TNF-alpha found on inflammatory cell surfaces, inducing apoptosis. Currently, infliximab is used for the induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (CD), with documented success. Infliximab's efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is now being investigated due to the similarities in the pathophysiology of CD and UC. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review and evaluate the current literature of infliximab use in steroid-refractory UC to assess its role in treatment. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE was conducted (1950-November 2007). Key terms included, but were not limited to, infliximab, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, cost, and quality of life. Studies included for review were limited to English-language, full-text, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clinical trials were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Four controlled clinical trials of infliximab in the treatment of steroid-refractory UC were found and assessed. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 43 patients with moderately severe, glucocorticoid-resistant UC, infliximab and placebo were not significantly different with respect to clinical and sigmoidoscopic remission or quality of life 2 and 6 weeks after infliximab treatment. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 45 patients with moderately severe to severe glucocorticoid-resistant UC, infliximab was associated with a significantly reduced need for colectomy compared with placebo (29% vs 67%; P=0.017). The Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials (ACT) 1 and 2 together included 728 patients with moderate to severe glucocorticoid-resistant UC. The primary outcome, the rate of clinical response at 8 weeks, was significantly higher with infliximab compared with placebo (5 mg/kg: ACT 1, 69.4%, ACT 2, 64.5%; 10 mg/kg: ACT 1, 61.5%, ACT 2, 69.2%; placebo: ACT 1, 37.2%;, ACT 2, 29.3%; all, P < 0.001 vs placebo). Based on the data from ACT 1 and 2, infliximab was associated with improved health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores based on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that infliximab is an effective alternative treatment option for patients with moderate to severe UC with an inadequate response to conventional glucocorticoid treatment. Further trials are needed to assess infliximab's impact on the treatment and progression of UC, the HRQL of patients with UC, and the economic impact on the health care system.

Multi-matrix system mesalamine: to use or not to use.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Multi-Matrix System (MMX) mesalamine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). DATA SOURCES: Literature was obtained through searches of MEDLINE (1966-October 2007) and a bibliographic review of published articles. Key terms used in the searches included ulcerative colitis, mesalamine, MMX, SPD476, and Lialda. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles that were identified through the search were evaluated. All primary literature was included in the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: The standard treatment for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate UC is aminosalicylate products (mesalamine, sulfasalazine, balasalazide, olsalazine). Current mesalamine formulations are not ideal for long-term treatment due to issues with patient adherence secondary to complex dosing regimens and high pill burden. Clinical studies show that MMX mesalamine achieves clinical and endoscopic remission more frequently compared with placebo or mesalamine enema. Patients receiving MMX mesalamine achieved statistically significant clinical and endoscopic remission when compared with those taking placebo (34.1% vs 12.9%; p < 0.001 with 2.4 g/day vs placebo, and 29.2% vs 12.9%; p = 0.009 with 4.8 g/day vs placebo). Similarly, in another study, significantly more patients achieved remission in the MMX mesalamine groups compared with patients in the placebo group (40.5% vs 22.1% with 2.4 g/day vs placebo; p = 0.01, and 41.2% vs 22.1% with 4.8 g/day vs placebo; p = 0.007). MMX mesalamine is well tolerated, with headache, flatulence, and abdominal pain being the most frequently reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the use of MMX mesalamine for treatment of mild-to-moderate UC by demonstrating that MMX mesalamine 2.4-4.8 g daily induces remission. It has the advantage of once-daily dosing regimens with lower pill burden than comparable products and, as an oral agent, may have better patient acceptability compared with topical mesalamine formulations. Therefore, MMX mesalamine is an option in patients with UC. The cost of MMX mesalamine is comparable to that of oral and rectal formulations of mesalamine. Further pharmacoeconomic studies are warranted to examine the cost impact of MMX mesalamine.