Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e028121, 2019 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375613

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Technological and medical advances have led to a growing population of children with medical complexity (CMC) defined by substantial medical needs, healthcare utilisation and morbidity. These children are at a high risk of missed, fragmented and/or inappropriate care, and families bear extraordinary financial burden and stress. While small in number (<1% of children), this group uses ~1/3 of all child healthcare resources, and need coordinated care to optimise their health. Complex care for kids Ontario (CCKO) brings researchers, families and healthcare providers together to develop, implement and evaluate a population-level roll-out of care for CMC in Ontario, Canada through a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. The intervention includes dedicated key workers and the utilisation of coordinated shared care plans. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our primary objective is to evaluate the CCKO intervention using a randomised waitlist control design. The waitlist approach involves rolling out an intervention over time, whereby all participants are randomised into two groups (A and B) to receive the intervention at different time points determined at random. Baseline measurements are collected at month 0, and groups A and B are compared at months 6 and 12. The primary outcome is the family-prioritized Family Experiences with Coordination of Care (FECC) survey at 12 months. The FECC will be compared between groups using an analysis of covariance with the corresponding baseline score as the covariate. Secondary outcomes include reports of child and parent health outcomes, health system utilisation and process outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been obtained for this multicentre RCT. This trial will assess the effect of a large population-level complex care intervention to determine whether dedicated key workers and coordinated care plans have an impact on improving service delivery and quality of life for CMC and their families. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02928757.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ontario , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
N Engl J Med ; 379(6): 535-546, 2018 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089075

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation improves fetal and infant growth in regions where vitamin D deficiency is common. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Bangladesh to assess the effects of weekly prenatal vitamin D supplementation (from 17 to 24 weeks of gestation until birth) and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on the primary outcome of infants' length-for-age z scores at 1 year according to World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards. One group received neither prenatal nor postpartum vitamin D (placebo group). Three groups received prenatal supplementation only, in doses of 4200 IU (prenatal 4200 group), 16,800 IU (prenatal 16,800 group), and 28,000 IU (prenatal 28,000 group). The fifth group received prenatal supplementation as well as 26 weeks of postpartum supplementation in the amount of 28,000 IU (prenatal and postpartum 28,000 group). RESULTS: Among 1164 infants assessed at 1 year of age (89.5% of 1300 pregnancies), there were no significant differences across groups in the mean (±SD) length-for-age z scores. Scores were as follows: placebo, -0.93±1.05; prenatal 4200, -1.11±1.12; prenatal 16,800, -0.97±0.97; prenatal 28,000, -1.06±1.07; and prenatal and postpartum 28,000, -0.94±1.00 (P=0.23 for a global test of differences across groups). Other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity did not differ significantly across groups. Vitamin D supplementation had expected effects on maternal and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium concentrations, maternal urinary calcium excretion, and maternal parathyroid hormone concentrations. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of adverse events across groups, with the exception of a higher rate of possible hypercalciuria among the women receiving the highest dose. CONCLUSIONS: In a population with widespread prenatal vitamin D deficiency and fetal and infant growth restriction, maternal vitamin D supplementation from midpregnancy until birth or until 6 months post partum did not improve fetal or infant growth. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924013 .).


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Crecimiento/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Bangladesh , Estatura/efectos de los fármacos , Países en Desarrollo , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido/crecimiento & desarrollo , Lactancia , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/efectos adversos , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Vitaminas/efectos adversos
3.
BMJ Open ; 7(2): e014080, 2017 02 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28167747

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Among youth, the prevalence of mental health and addiction (MHA) disorders is roughly 20%, yet youth are challenged to access evidence-based services in a timely fashion. To address MHA system gaps, this study tests the benefits of an Integrated Collaborative Care Team (ICCT) model for youth with MHA challenges. A rapid, stepped-care approach geared to need in a youth-friendly environment is expected to result in better youth MHA outcomes. Moreover, the ICCT approach is expected to decrease service wait-times, be more youth-friendly and family-friendly, and be more cost-effective, providing substantial public health benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In partnership with four community agencies, four adolescent psychiatry hospital departments, youth and family members with lived experience of MHA service use, and other stakeholders, we have developed an innovative model of collaborative, community-based service provision involving rapid access to needs-based MHA services. A total of 500 youth presenting for hospital-based, outpatient psychiatric service will be randomised to ICCT services or hospital-based treatment as usual, following a pragmatic randomised controlled trial design. The primary outcome variable will be the youth's functioning, assessed at intake, 6 months and 12 months. Secondary outcomes will include clinical change, youth/family satisfaction and perception of care, empowerment, engagement and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Intent-to-treat analyses will be used on repeated-measures data, along with cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, to determine intervention effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research Ethics Board approval has been received from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, as well as institutional ethical approval from participating community sites. This study will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Participants will provide informed consent prior to study participation and data confidentiality will be ensured. A data safety monitoring panel will monitor the study. Results will be disseminated through community and peer-reviewed academic channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02836080.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Adolescente/organización & administración , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adolescente , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Trials ; 17(1): 261, 2016 05 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27220675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Up to 30 % of children with acute asthma are refractory to initial therapy, and 84 % of this subpopulation needs hospitalization. Finding safe, noninvasive, and effective strategies to treat this high-risk group would substantially decrease hospitalizations, healthcare costs, and the psycho-social burden of the disease. Whereas intravenous magnesium (Mg) is effective in severe refractory asthma, its use is sporadic due to safety concerns, with the main treatment goal being to prevent intensive care unit admission. In contrast, nebulized Mg is noninvasive, allows higher pulmonary drug concentrations, and has a much higher safety potential due to the lower rate of systemic delivery. Previous studies of inhaled Mg show disparate results due to the use of unknown/inefficient delivery methods and other methodological flaws. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a randomized double-blind controlled trial in seven Canadian pediatric Emergency Departments (two-center pilot 2011 to 2014, Canada-wide November 2014 to December 2017). The trial will include 816 otherwise healthy children who are 2 to 17 years old, having had at least one previous wheezing episode, have received systemic corticosteroids, and have a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) ≥ 5 points after three salbutamol and ipratropium treatments for a current acute asthma exacerbation. Eligible consenting children will receive three experimental treatments of nebulized salbutamol with either 600 mg of Mg sulfate or placebo 20 min apart, using an Aeroneb Go nebulizer, which has been shown to maximize pulmonary delivery while maintaining safety. The primary outcome is hospitalization within 24 h of the start of the experimental therapy for persistent respiratory distress or supplemental oxygen. Secondary outcomes include all-cause hospitalization within 24 h, PRAM, vital signs, number of bronchodilator treatments by 240 min, and the association between the difference in the primary outcome between the groups, age, gender, baseline PRAM, atopy, and "viral induced wheeze" phenotype (Fig. 1). DISCUSSION: If effective, inhaled Mg may represent an effective strategy to minimize morbidity in pediatric refractory acute asthma. Unlike previous works, this trial targets nonresponders to optimized initial therapy who are the most likely to benefit from inhaled Mg. Future dissemination of results will include knowledge translation, incorporation into a Cochrane Review, presentation at scientific meetings, and a peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCTO1429415 , registered 2 September 2011.


Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos Clínicos , Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Magnesio/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
5.
Trials ; 16: 300, 2015 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169781

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D regulates bone mineral metabolism and skeletal development. Some observational studies have suggested that prenatal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of adverse pregnancy and/or birth outcomes; however, there is scant evidence from controlled trials, leading the World Health Organization to advise against routine vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Importantly, little is known about the effect of maternal vitamin D status on infant linear growth in communities in South Asia where stunting is highly prevalent and maternal-infant vitamin D status is commonly suboptimal. METHODS/DESIGN: The Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The primary aims are to estimate (1) the effect of maternal prenatal oral vitamin D3 supplementation (4200 IU/wk, 16,800 IU/wk, or 28,000 IU/wk, administered as weekly doses) versus placebo on infant length at 1 year of age and (2) the effect of maternal postpartum oral vitamin D3 supplementation (28,000 IU/wk) versus placebo on length at 1 year of age among infants born to women who received vitamin D 28,000 IU/wk during pregnancy. Generally healthy pregnant women (n = 1300) in the second trimester (17-24 weeks of gestation) are randomized to one of five parallel arms: placebo 4200 IU/wk, 16,800 IU/wk, or 28,000 IU/wk in the prenatal period and placebo in the postpartum period or 28,000 IU/wk in the prenatal period and 28,000 IU/wk in the postpartum period. Household- and clinic-based follow-up of mother-infant pairs is conducted weekly by trained personnel until 26 weeks postpartum and every 3 months thereafter. The primary trial outcome measure is length for age z-score at 1 year of age. Anthropometric measurements, clinical information, and biological specimens collected at scheduled intervals will enable the assessment of a range of maternal, perinatal, and infant outcomes. DISCUSSION: The role of vitamin D in maternal and infant health remains unresolved. This trial is expected to contribute unique insights into the effects of improving maternal-infant vitamin D status in a low-income setting where stunting and adverse perinatal outcomes represent significant public health burdens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01924013. Registered on 13 August 2013.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos , Trastornos del Crecimiento/prevención & control , Lactancia , Fenómenos Fisiologicos Nutricionales Maternos , Estado Nutricional , Administración Oral , Factores de Edad , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Estatura , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Países en Desarrollo , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Crecimiento/fisiopatología , Humanos , Lactante , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMJ ; 337: a1021, 2008 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18755762

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a complex nursing and midwifery intervention in hospital labour assessment units would increase the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth and improve other maternal and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled trial with prognostic stratification by hospital. SETTING: 20 North American and UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 5002 nulliparous women experiencing contractions but not in active labour; 2501 were allocated to structured care and 2501 to usual care. INTERVENTIONS: Usual nursing or midwifery care or a minimum of one hour of care by a nurse or midwife trained in structured care, consisting of a formalised approach to assessment of and interventions for maternal emotional state, pain, and fetal position. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal birth. Other outcomes included intrapartum interventions, women's views of their care, and indicators of maternal and fetal health during hospital stay and 6-8 weeks after discharge. RESULTS: Outcome data were obtained for 4996 women. The rate of spontaneous vaginal birth was 64.0% (n=1597) in the structured care group and 61.3% (n=1533) in the usual care group (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.27). Fewer women allocated to structured care (n=403, 19.5%) rated staff helpfulness as less than very helpful than those allocated to usual care (n=544, 26.4%); odds ratio 0.67, 98.75% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.85. Fewer women allocated to structured care (n=233, 11.3%) were disappointed with the amount of attention received from staff than those allocated to usual care (n=407, 19.7%); odds ratio 0.51, 98.75% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.70. None of the other results met prespecified levels of statistical significance. CONCLUSION: A structured approach to care in hospital labour assessment units increased satisfaction with care and was suggestive of a modest increase in the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth. Further study to strengthen the intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16315180.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Partería/métodos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/enfermería , Enfermería Obstétrica/métodos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Escolaridad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Hospitalización , Maternidades/organización & administración , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Estado Civil , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA