Bone Health and Bone-Targeted Therapies for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bone health is a significant concern in men with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of drug, supplement, and lifestyle interventions aimed at preventing fracture, improving bone mineral density (BMD), or preventing or delaying osteoporosis in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 19 January 2017), EMBASE (1980 to 18 January 2017), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (19 January 2017). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials and systematic reviews of trials that were published in English; involved men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer; and compared bone-targeted therapies with placebo, usual care, or other active treatments. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed study risk of bias for each outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two systematic reviews and 28 reports of 27 trials met inclusion criteria. All trials focused on men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were initiating or continuing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Bisphosphonates were effective in increasing BMD, but no trial was sufficiently powered to detect reduction in fractures. Denosumab improved BMD and reduced the incidence of new radiographic vertebral fractures in 1 high-quality trial. No trials compared calcium or vitamin D versus placebo. Three lifestyle intervention trials did not show a statistically significant difference in change in BMD between exercise and usual care. LIMITATIONS: Most trials were of moderate quality. Only 2 randomized controlled trials were designed to examine fracture outcomes. Potential harms of treatments were not evaluated. CONCLUSION: Both bisphosphonates and denosumab improve BMD in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who are receiving ADT. Denosumab also reduces risk for radiographic vertebral fractures, based on 1 trial. More trials studying fracture outcomes are needed in this population. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Program in Evidence-Based Care.

Systemic therapy in the curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence and make recommendations regarding use of systemically administered drugs in combination or in sequence with radiation (RT) and/or surgery for cure and/or organ preservation in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic (Stage III to IVB) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN). METHOD: Recognizing the Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) group reports have de facto guided practice since 2000, we searched for systematic reviews in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published from January 2000 to February 2015 in reference to 4 research questions. A search was also conducted for randomized trials (RCTs) up to February 2015 not included in the meta-analyses. RESULT: The MACH-NC reports, 5 additional meta-analyses, and 30 RCTs not included by MACH-NC were identified. For chemotherapy, MACH-NC findings showing improved overall survival with concomitant chemoRT did not require modification. High-dose cisplatin was most commonly studied. We confirmed this benefit with cisplatin monotherapy in patients treated with with postoperative concurrent chemoRT. Other than cetuximab, no targeted agents and radiosensitizers studied in RCTs were shown effective. TPF induction chemotherapy was superior to PF for tumor response and larynx preservation but not survival. Larynx preservation was reported with both CRT and induction chemotherapy approaches. CONCLUSION: ChemoRT with cisplatin at least 40 mg/m2 per week given as radical or postoperative adjuvant remains a standard treatment approach for LASCCHN that improves overall survival but increases toxicity. 5-FU plus platinum is supported by less data but may be a reasonable alternative for patients unsuitable for cisplatin. Of note, stratification of outcomes by HPV-status was not available but outcomes for oropharynx cancer appeared similar to other subsites in chemoRT RCTs. No RCTs have yet demonstrated superiority or non-inferiority of cetuximab-RT to CRT. In view of this, cetuximab-RT is suggested only for patients not candidates for CRT. Taxane-based triplet induction chemotherapy is superior to doublets for rapid tumour downsizing and for larynx preservation, but does not improve overall survival and should be used with primary G-CSF prophylaxis. Further investigation of induction approaches for larynx preservation may be warranted.

Pretreatment Serum Folate Levels and Toxicity/Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy is associated with severe and unpredictable toxicity in a significant proportion of patients. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate bind to thymidylate synthase and together inhibit its function, resulting in cytotoxicity. We hypothesized that susceptibility to 5-FU toxicity might be related to individual differences in the serum components of folate metabolism affecting intracellular 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of chemotherapy-naive colorectal cancer patients scheduled to receive intravenous 5-FU and folinic acid for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in both adjuvant and palliative settings was studied. Pretreatment clinical and laboratory data were collected. Biochemical data associated with folate metabolism were also collected. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity and/or toxicity mandating dose delay or reduction. RESULTS: For the 78 eligible patients studied, multivariable analyses identified only a greater pretreatment serum folate level as an independent predictor of grade ≥ 3 toxicity and/or mandating schedule modification (P = .016). Comparing the patient cohorts among the folate quartile groups revealed increasing toxicity trends in the highest quartile with an odds ratio of 2.58 (P = .19) compared with the combined lower quartiles, and superior relapse-free and overall survival for patients treated in the adjuvant setting. Log-rank analysis showed a significant association between higher folate levels and relapse-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The pretreatment serum folate level did not conclusively influence 5-FU toxicity and antitumor efficacy. However, high folate levels showed a trend toward a greater incidence of severe toxicities but also lower rates of disease recurrence and mortality. These results provide promising hypothesis-generating data warranting further investigation. The predictive value of pretreatment folate status should be a priority for study in cancer patients receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy and should be considered a potentially confounding factor in clinical trials and a modifiable parameter in treatment.

A phase II study of sorafenib in combination with bicalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naive castration resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the clinical effects of sorafenib, a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, in combination with androgen receptor blockade in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a multicenter, two-stage, phase 2 trial. Eligible patients had rising PSA, minimal symptoms and were chemotherapy-naïve. Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was administered with bicalutamide 50 mg once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was PSA response (≥ 50% decline) or stable disease ≥ 6 months. RESULTS: 39 patients were enrolled including eight without clinical evidence of metastases. Eighteen (47%) patients have had either a PSA response or stable disease ≥ 6 months. PSA declines of ≥ 50% occurred in 12 (32%) of 38 assessable patients, including seven of 27 patients (26%) with prior anti-androgen use. Median time to treatment failure was 5.5 months (95%CI = 4.8.1-8.3). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included fatigue, skin rash, and hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: PSA declines and stable disease were observed with a combination of sorafenib and bicalutamide including in patients previously progressing on bicalutamide. Strategies to combine multi-targeted kinase inhibitors with hormonal therapies warrant further study in patients with CRPC.

A phase II trial of sorafenib in first-line metastatic urothelial cancer: a study of the PMH Phase II Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks cell proliferation via the ERK pathway and angiogenesis via the VEGF pathway. This phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib for the treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) who had not had prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen chemo-naïve UC patients with adequate performance status and organ function were treated with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily on a continuous basis until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response rate as measured by RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints included rate of prolonged stable disease (>3 months), time to progression, median and 1 yr survival and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: There were no objective responses. Only one patient had stable disease by RECIST criteria and remained on treatment more than 3 months. Three patients had stable disease by RECIST criteria but were on treatment less than 3 months due to progressive disease (PD) or adverse events (AE). Eight patients had PD by RECIST criteria as their best overall response. Two patients had symptomatic PD prior to cycle 2 evaluation, and three patients were inevaluable (1 death, 1 AE, 1 withdrew consent).The time to progression was 1.9 months (range 0.7-8.7 months) and median survival was 5.9 months. The most common grade 3+ toxicities were abdominal pain, back pain, hand-foot reaction and bladder infection. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib does not show sufficient activity as a single agent in first-line metastatic urothelial cancer to warrant further investigation.

Nutritional support for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is associated with weight loss before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy (RT). This systematic review addressed the question "Which interventions aimed at optimizing nutrition are of benefit to HNSCC patients receiving RT?" METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying interventions directed at nutritional support of adult patients with HNSCC receiving RT with or without chemotherapy were eligible. RCTs studying prophylaxis of acute mucositis, perioperative nutrition, or palliative and non-HNSCC populations were excluded. A comprehensive literature search was done and meta-analyses planned. RESULTS: Ten unique RCTs were identified (n = 585). All randomized less than 50 patients per trial arm. Five trials studied dietary counseling and/or nutritional supplements, four studied drug interventions, and one studied prophylactic enteral tube feeding. Nutritional status appeared to be maintained or improved with dietary counseling, megestrol acetate, and prophylactic enteral tube feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Data from RCTs supporting the use of interventions to optimize nutrition in HNSCC patients receiving RT are limited in both quantity and quality. Potentially effective interventions have not been tested comparatively or in combination, and few patients receiving chemoradiotherapy were studied. Further research in this area is a priority.

Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT).

CONTEXT: Secondary analyses of 2 randomized controlled trials and supportive epidemiologic and preclinical data indicated the potential of selenium and vitamin E for preventing prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether selenium, vitamin E, or both could prevent prostate cancer and other diseases with little or no toxicity in relatively healthy men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial [SELECT]) of 35,533 men from 427 participating sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico randomly assigned to 4 groups (selenium, vitamin E, selenium + vitamin E, and placebo) in a double-blind fashion between August 22, 2001, and June 24, 2004. Baseline eligibility included age 50 years or older (African American men) or 55 years or older (all other men), a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 4 ng/mL or less, and a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Oral selenium (200 microg/d from L-selenomethionine) and matched vitamin E placebo, vitamin E (400 IU/d of all rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate) and matched selenium placebo, selenium + vitamin E, or placebo + placebo for a planned follow-up of minimum of 7 years and a maximum of 12 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prostate cancer and prespecified secondary outcomes, including lung, colorectal, and overall primary cancer. RESULTS: As of October 23, 2008, median overall follow-up was 5.46 years (range, 4.17-7.33 years). Hazard ratios (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) for prostate cancer were 1.13 (99% CI, 0.95-1.35; n = 473) for vitamin E, 1.04 (99% CI, 0.87-1.24; n = 432) for selenium, and 1.05 (99% CI, 0.88-1.25; n = 437) for selenium + vitamin E vs 1.00 (n = 416) for placebo. There were no significant differences (all P>.15) in any other prespecified cancer end points. There were statistically nonsignificant increased risks of prostate cancer in the vitamin E group (P = .06) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the selenium group (relative risk, 1.07; 99% CI, 0.94-1.22; P = .16) but not in the selenium + vitamin E group. CONCLUSION: Selenium or vitamin E, alone or in combination at the doses and formulations used, did not prevent prostate cancer in this population of relatively healthy men. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00006392.

Phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase II trial, oral continuous sorafenib was administered in 28-day cycles. Patients had

Interleukin-2 in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic renal cell cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of interleukin-2 (IL-2) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We searched the literature to identify RCTs or meta-analyses of RCTs comparing treatment regimens with IL-2 to those without. Outcomes of interest included overall or progression-free survival, response rate, toxicity and quality of life. RESULTS: We identified 36 RCTs, and 6 met the eligibility criteria (1098 patients). We studied IL-2 alone and in combination with other agents, including interferon-alpha (IFN-a), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 13-cis-retinoic acid or tamoxifen. No trials comparing high-dose IL-2 to non-IL-2 regimens were identified. A meta-analysis of 1-year mortality data from the 6 trials did not show a difference between IL-2-based regimens and non-IL-2 controls. Two of the 6 trials detected statistically significant longer survival with IL-2 combined with IFN-a and 5-FU. Of the 4 trials that assessed progression-free survival, 3 reported significantly longer progression-free intervals with IL-2-based regimens. Five trials reported response rates; pooling the rates from these trials gave an overall weighted response rate of 13.3% (range 9%-39%) and 5.3% (range 0%-20%) for IL-2-containing regimens and non-IL-2 regimens, respectively. IL-2-based regimens were more toxic than were non-IL-2 controls; the most frequently reported grade 3-4 toxicities were hypotension (range 6%-68%), fever (2%-56%), nausea or vomiting or both (6%-34%), diarrhea (1%-28%) and cardiac toxicity (11%-25%). None of the trials reported health-related quality-of-life data. CONCLUSION: Non-high-dose IL-2 containing regimens do not provide superior treatment efficacy over non-IL-2-based regimens, with added toxicity, and therefore should not be used as standard treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC. High-dose IL-2 should only be used by experienced physicians in the context of a clinical trial or investigative setting.