Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Revista
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trials ; 17(1): 431, 2016 09 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often fail to recruit sufficient participants, despite altruism being cited as their motivation. Previous investigations of factors influencing participation decisions have been methodologically limited. This study evaluated how women weigh up different motivations after initially expressing altruism, and explored their understanding of a trial and its alternatives. The trial was the 'Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction' (QUEST) trial. METHODS: Thirty-nine women participated in qualitative interviews 1 month post-surgery. Twenty-seven women (10 trial decliners and 17 acceptors) who spontaneously mentioned 'altruism' were selected for thematic analysis. Verbatim transcripts were coded independently by two researchers. Participants' motivations to accept or decline randomisation were cross-referenced with their understanding of the QUEST trials and the process of randomisation. RESULTS: The seven emerging themes were: (1) altruism expressed by acceptors and decliners; (2) overriding personal needs in decliners; (3) pure altruism in acceptors; (4) 'hypothetical altruism' amongst acceptors; (5) weak altruism amongst acceptors; (6) conditional altruism amongst acceptors; and (7) sense of duty to participate. Poor understanding of the trial rationale and its implications was also evident. CONCLUSIONS: Altruism was a motivating factor for participation in the QUEST randomised controlled trials where the main outcomes comprised quality of life and allocated treatments comprised established surgical procedures. Women's decisions were influenced by their understanding of the trial. Both acceptors and decliners of the trial expressed 'altruism', but most acceptors lacked an obvious treatment preference, hoped for personal benefits regarding a treatment allocation, or did not articulate complete understanding of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: QUEST A, ISRCTN38846532 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010. QUEST B, ISRCTN92581226 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010.


Asunto(s)
Altruismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Consentimiento Informado , Mamoplastia , Mastectomía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Sujetos de Investigación/psicología , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Comprensión , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/psicología , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA