A high-content image-based drug screen of clinical compounds against cell transmission of adenovirus.

Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) are fatal to immuno-suppressed individuals, but no effective anti-HAdV therapy is available. Here, we present a novel image-based high-throughput screening (HTS) platform, which scores the full viral replication cycle from virus entry to dissemination of progeny and second-round infections. We analysed 1,280 small molecular weight compounds of the Prestwick Chemical Library (PCL) for interference with HAdV-C2 infection in a quadruplicate, blinded format, and performed robust image analyses and hit filtering. We present the entire set of the screening data including all images, image analyses and data processing pipelines. The data are made available at the Image Data Resource (IDR, idr0081). Our screen identified Nelfinavir mesylate as an inhibitor of HAdV-C2 multi-round plaque formation, but not single round infection. Nelfinavir has been FDA-approved for anti-retroviral therapy in humans. Our results underscore the power of image-based full cycle infection assays in identifying viral inhibitors with clinical potential.

Magnetic resonance imaging and deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead displacement or program interference. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo studies were performed with the Itrel II implantable pulse generator (IPG) (Model 7424; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), Medtronic 3387 and 3389 leads, and a 1.5-T GE Horizon LX scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). In the in vivo study, two MRI volumetric data sets were compared for each of five patients undergoing staged, bilateral, DBS electrode placement in the thalamic or subthalamic nucleus. The data sets were acquired shortly after the initial implantation and during stereotactic planning for the second implantation (1-8 mo between acquisitions). An additional thalamotomy-treated patient was included as a control patient. Volumetric data were analyzed in a blinded manner, using AnalyzeAVW 3.0 software (Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), to determine lead movement. In the in vitro study, the IPG and leads were positioned in the magnetic field in various configurations and were systematically assessed for movement. RESULTS: In vivo, the majority of measured deviations (88%) were within the standard error of measurement (1.4 mm). The maximal measured deviation was 3 mm (2% occurrence). Excellent tremor control with stimulation was demonstrated, which did not change after MRI. In vitro, the DBS leads demonstrated no deflection when introduced into the magnetic field. Similarly, no changes in IPG battery strength, lead impedance, or program settings were observed. CONCLUSION: MRI was not associated with significant DBS electrode movement or changes in clinical responses. Other IPG models and components and MRI scanners should be evaluated, to develop specific guidelines for MRI among individuals with implanted DBS systems.