Identifying priorities for balance interventions through a participatory co-design approach with end-users.

BACKGROUND: Most individuals living with spinal cord injuries/diseases (SCI/D) or stroke experience at least one fall each year; hence, the development of interventions and technologies that target balance control is needed. The purpose of this study was to identify and explore the priorities for balance-focused interventions and technologies from the perspectives of end-users to assist with the design of an intervention that combines functional electrical stimulation (FES) with visual feedback training for standing balance. METHODS: Two individuals with SCI/D, one individual with stroke, two physical therapists (PT) and one hospital administrator were recruited. Participants attended three focus group meetings that followed a participatory co-design approach. A semi-structured interview guide, developed from the FAME (Feasibility, Appropriateness, Meaningfulness, Effectiveness, Economic Evidence) framework, was used to lead the discussion, querying participants' experiences with balance deficits and interventions, and FES. Meetings were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An iterative and reflexive inductive thematic analysis was applied to the transcripts by three researchers. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) Balance is meaningful for daily life and rehabilitation. Participants acknowledged various factors influencing balance control and how balance deficits interfered with participation in activities. End-users stressed the importance of continuing to work on one's balance after discharge from hospital-based rehabilitation. (2) Desired characteristics of balance interventions. Participants explained that balance interventions should be tailored to an individual's unique needs and goals, relevant to their lives, balance their safety and risk, and be engaging. (3) Prior experiences with FES to inform future therapeutic use. Participants with stroke or SCI/D described initial apprehension with FES, but experienced numerous benefits that motivated them to continue with FES. Challenges with FES were mentioned, including wires, cost, and time of set up. (4) Potential role of FES in balance interventions. Participants felt that FES would complement balance interventions; however, they had not experienced this combination of therapies previously. CONCLUSIONS: End-users described how their experiences with balance deficits, rehabilitation, and FES informed their priorities for balance interventions. The findings inform the design and implementation of future balance interventions for individuals with SCI/D or stroke, including an intervention involving FES and visual feedback training.

Addressing the elephant in the room: integrating sexual health practice in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Sexual health, a basic human right, maybe disrupted after a spinal cord injury (SCI) and is often not addressed in rehabilitation. This quality improvement initiative embedded sexual health education and support for patients with SCI into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2017-2018 a team of clinicians, researchers and persons with SCI developed and implemented a new sexual health practice in SCI rehabilitation. A systematic process was undertaken which included implementation science principles; the PLISSIT model and Sexual Rehabilitation Framework were foundational to the new practice. RESULTS: Adult inpatients with SCI began receiving the sexual health practice in June 2018. After 6 months, patient and health care provider surveys were conducted. Patients reported increased awareness of sexual health resources and increased satisfaction with sexual health concerns being addressed. Clinicians reported increased comfort in addressing patients' sexual health concerns and increased awareness of sexual health resources. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding the new sexual health practice facilitates the reintegration of sexual health into the daily lives of SCI patients and supports a more comprehensive and holistic rehabilitation. It normalizes sexual health concerns and questions in an SCI rehabilitation facility.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSexual health is noted to be a top priority among persons with spinal cord injury, however, this area of care is often overlooked by healthcare providers across the rehabilitation continuum.A team of clinicians, researchers, and persons with SCI used a systematic process to address this gap by developing and implementing a new sexual health practice in the SCI rehabilitation program.This quality improvement initiative resulted in increased clinician knowledge and confidence in this domain of practice and greater patient satisfaction in having their sexual health needs to be addressed during rehabilitation.

Rehabilitation Interventions to modify endocrine-metabolic disease risk in Individuals with chronic Spinal cord injury living in the Community (RIISC): A systematic review and scoping perspective.

CONTEXT: Endocrine-metabolic disease (EMD) risk following spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with significant multi-morbidity (i.e. fracture, diabetes, heart disease), mortality, and economic burden. It is unclear to what extent rehabilitation interventions can modify EMD risk and improve health status in community-dwelling adults with chronic SCI. OBJECTIVES: To characterize rehabilitation interventions and summarize evidence on their efficacy/effectiveness to modify precursors to EMD risk in community-dwelling adults with chronic SCI. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE PubMed, EMBASE Ovid, CINAHL, CDSR, and PsychInfo were completed. All randomized, quasi-experimental, and prospective controlled trials comparing rehabilitation/therapeutic interventions with control/placebo interventions in adults with chronic SCI were eligible. Two authors independently selected studies and abstracted data. Mean differences of change from baseline were reported for EMD risk outcomes. The GRADE approach was used to rate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Of 489 articles identified, 16 articles (11 studies; n=396) were eligible for inclusion. No studies assessed the effects of rehabilitation interventions on incident fragility fractures, heart disease, and/or diabetes. Individual studies reported that exercise and/or nutrition interventions could improve anthropometric indices, body composition/adiposity, and biomarkers. However, there were also reports of non-statistically significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: There was very low-quality evidence that rehabilitation interventions can improve precursors to EMD risk in community-dwelling adults with chronic SCI. The small number of studies, imprecise estimates, and inconsistency across studies limited our ability to make conclusions. A high-quality longitudinal intervention trial is needed to inform community-based rehabilitation strategies for EMD risk after chronic SCI.

Neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury part 2: systematic review of dorsal root entry zone procedure.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy may not sufficiently reduce neuropathic pain in many individuals post spinal cord injury (SCI). The use of alternative therapies such as surgery may be effective in reducing neuropathic pain in these individuals. However, because of the invasive nature of surgery, it is important to examine the evidence for use of this treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of published literature on the surgical treatment of neuropathic pain after SCI. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for articles in which surgical treatment of pain after SCI was examined. Articles were restricted to the English language. Article selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers with the following inclusion criteria: the subjects participated in a surgical intervention for neuropathic pain; at least 50% of the subjects had an SCI; at least 3 subjects had an SCI; and a definable intervention involving the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) procedure was used to reduce pain. Data extracted included study design, study type, subject demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, outcome measures, and study results. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed for quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) assessment scale. Levels of evidence were assigned to each intervention using a modified Sackett scale. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. One study provided level 2 evidence, and the rest provided level 4 evidence. The DREZ procedure was shown to be more effective for segmental pain than for diffuse pain after SCI. Further, individuals with conus medullaris level injury were found to have a higher level of neuropathic pain relief than those with cervical, thoracic, or cauda equina injury. CONCLUSIONS: The studies demonstrated that the DREZ procedure may be effective in reducing segmental pain. Hence, DREZ may be important in treatment of neuropathic pain in individuals resistant to less invasive treatments. Because the studies lacked control conditions and examination of long-term effects, there is a need for larger trials with more stringent conditions.

A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers in those with a spinal cord injury (SCI). DATA SOURCES: For this evidence-based review, the following data sources were used: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. STUDY SELECTION: To be selected for inclusion in the current review, there had to have been an intervention, studies had to have 3 or more subjects, and 50% or more of the participating group had to have an SCI. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted included study design, subject demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study type, sample size, outcome measures used, and study results. DATA SYNTHESIS: Articles selected for this review were organized into 1 of 2 categories: prevention or treatment. Within each broad category, several smaller ones were created, and articles were grouped according to the prevention (direct or indirect) or treatment intervention discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 26 articles selected for inclusion in the systematic review, 7 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that dealt with treatment for pressure ulcers, and there was 1 RCT on prevention. Despite the cost-effectiveness of prevention, little research exists on preventative interventions, and what does exist is mostly level 4 evidence. More research is needed for both prevention and treatment, but especially the former.