Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS.

Sensory deprivation can offset the balance of audio versus visual information in multimodal processing. Such a phenomenon could persist for children born deaf, even after they receive cochlear implants (CIs), and could potentially explain why one modality is given priority over the other. Here, we recorded cortical responses to a single speaker uttering two syllables, presented in audio-only (A), visual-only (V), and audio-visual (AV) modes. Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were successively recorded in seventy-five school-aged children. Twenty-five were children with normal hearing (NH) and fifty wore CIs, among whom 26 had relatively high language abilities (HL) comparable to those of NH children, while 24 others had low language abilities (LL). In EEG data, visual-evoked potentials were captured in occipital regions, in response to V and AV stimuli, and they were accentuated in the HL group compared to the LL group (the NH group being intermediate). Close to the vertex, auditory-evoked potentials were captured in response to A and AV stimuli and reflected a differential treatment of the two syllables but only in the NH group. None of the EEG metrics revealed any interaction between group and modality. In fNIRS data, each modality induced a corresponding activity in visual or auditory regions, but no group difference was observed in A, V, or AV stimulation. The present study did not reveal any sign of abnormal AV integration in children with CI. An efficient multimodal integrative network (at least for rudimentary speech materials) is clearly not a sufficient condition to exhibit good language and literacy.

Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: Although children with cochlear implants (CI) achieve remarkable success with their device, considerable variability remains in individual outcomes. Here, we explored whether auditory evoked potentials recorded during an oddball paradigm could provide useful markers of auditory processing in this pediatric population. METHODS: High-density electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded in 75 children listening to standard and odd noise stimuli: 25 had normal hearing (NH) and 50 wore a CI, divided between high language (HL) and low language (LL) abilities. Three metrics were extracted: the first negative and second positive components of the standard waveform (N1-P2 complex) close to the vertex, the mismatch negativity (MMN) around Fz and the late positive component (P3) around Pz of the difference waveform. RESULTS: While children with CIs generally exhibited a well-formed N1-P2 complex, those with language delays typically lacked reliable MMN and P3 components. But many children with CIs with age-appropriate skills showed MMN and P3 responses similar to those of NH children. Moreover, larger and earlier P3 (but not MMN) was linked to better literacy skills. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory evoked responses differentiated children with CIs based on their good or poor skills with language and literacy. SIGNIFICANCE: This short paradigm could eventually serve as a clinical tool for tracking the developmental outcomes of implanted children.

Measurement of the Electrically Evoked Stapedial Reflex Response with Wideband Acoustic Reflectance Measurement.

BACKGROUND: The electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (ESRT) has been shown to be a good predictor of upper stimulation level for cochlear implant recipients. Previous research has shown that the ESRT may be recorded at lower stimulation levels and with a higher incidence of success with the use of higher frequency probe tones (e.g., 678 and 1000 Hz) relative to the use of the conventional 226-Hz probe tone. Research has also shown that the acoustic reflex may be recorded at lower stimulus levels with the use of wideband reflectance when compared to the acoustic reflex threshold recorded with a conventional acoustic immittance measurement. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the ESRT recorded with acoustic immittance and wideband reflectance measurements. RESEARCH DESIGN: A repeated measures design was used to evaluate potential differences in ESRTs with stimulation at an apical, middle, and basal electrode contact with the use of two different techniques, acoustic immittance measurement and wideband reflectance. STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve users of Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implants were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants' ESRTs were evaluated in response to simulation at three different electrode contact sites (i.e., an apical, middle, and basal electrode contact) with the use of two different middle ear measurement techniques, acoustic immittance with the use of a 226-Hz probe tone and wideband reflectance with the use of a chirp stimulus. RESULTS: The mean ESRT recorded with wideband reflectance measurement was significantly lower when compared to the ESRT recorded with acoustic immittance. For one participant, the ESRT was not recorded with acoustic immittance before reaching the participant's loudness discomfort threshold, but it was successfully recorded with the use of wideband reflectance. CONCLUSIONS: The ESRT may potentially be recorded at lower presentation levels with the use of wideband reflectance measures relative to the use of acoustic immittance with a 226-Hz probe tone. This may allow for the ESRT to be obtained at levels that are more comfortable for the cochlear implant recipient, which may also allow for a higher incidence in the successful recording of the ESRT.

Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: A number of published studies have demonstrated the benefits of electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) over conventional electric stimulation for adults with functional low-frequency acoustic hearing and severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss. These benefits potentially include better speech recognition in quiet and in noise, better localization, improvements in sound quality, better music appreciation and aptitude, and better pitch recognition. There is, however, a paucity of published reports describing the potential benefits and limitations of EAS for children with functional low-frequency acoustic hearing and severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the potential benefits of EAS for children. RESEARCH DESIGN: A repeated measures design was used to evaluate performance differences obtained with EAS stimulation versus acoustic- and electric-only stimulation. STUDY SAMPLE: Seven users of Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid, Nucleus 24 Freedom, CI512, and CI422 implants were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Sentence recognition (assayed using the pediatric version of the AzBio sentence recognition test) was evaluated in quiet and at three fixed signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (0, +5, and +10 dB). Functional hearing performance was also evaluated with the use of questionnaires, including the comparative version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities, the Listening Inventory for Education Revised, and the Children's Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties. RESULTS: Speech recognition in noise was typically better with EAS compared to participants' performance with acoustic- and electric-only stimulation, particularly when evaluated at the less favorable SNR. Additionally, in real-world situations, children generally preferred to use EAS compared to electric-only stimulation. Also, the participants' classroom teachers observed better hearing performance in the classroom with the use of EAS. CONCLUSIONS: Use of EAS provided better speech recognition in quiet and in noise when compared to performance obtained with use of acoustic- and electric-only stimulation, and children responded favorably to the use of EAS implemented in an integrated sound processor for real-world use.

Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research shows that cochlear implant users experience significant difficulty with speech perception in noisy listening situations. There is a paucity of research evaluating the potential improvement in speech recognition in noise provided by a dual-microphone directional system in a commercial implant sound processor. The primary objective of this study was to compare speech recognition in quiet and in noise for the Nucleus Freedom and Nucleus 5 CP810 sound processors set to the manufacturer's default user programs for quiet and noisy environments. RESEARCH DESIGN: Crossover with repeated-measures design. SETTING: This multi-center study was conducted across four cochlear implant clinics in the United States. PATIENTS: Thirty-five adults with unilateral Nucleus Freedom cochlear implants. All subjects had used their cochlear implant for at least 6 months and had substantial open-set word recognition as evidenced by a score of at least 40% correct on the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word recognition test in quiet. INTERVENTION: All subjects (previous users of the Nucleus Freedom sound processor) were fitted with the Nucleus 5 sound processor. Performance was assessed while these subjects used each sound processor in the default user program the manufacturer recommends for quiet and noisy conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition was assessed with CNC monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise from the BKB-SIN (Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentences in Noise) test. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and performance with each processor in each listening condition was compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Word recognition in quiet was significantly better with the Nucleus 5 sound processor when compared to performance with the Nucleus Freedom processor. In noise, the Nucleus 5 sound processor also provided a significant improvement in speech recognition relative to the performance with the Nucleus Freedom. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that the Nucleus 5 sound processor provides significantly better speech recognition in quiet and in noise when compared with performance with the Nucleus Freedom processor.

Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) as a means to improve speech recognition for children with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss following a six-month acclimatization period. DESIGN: Within subject design with repeated measures across test conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen children, ages 5 to 13 years, with moderate to moderately-severe high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with Phonak Nios, micro-sized, BTE hearing aids and evaluated after two six-week intervals with and without NLFC and again after a six-month period of consecutive NLFC use. RESULTS: Using repeated measures analyses, the six-month results were compared to data that was collected following six-week trials with and without NLFC hearing aids (Wolfe et al, in press). Improvements seen with NLFC in the initial study (Wolfe et al, in press) were maintained or significantly increased in the present study. When compared to the six-week data, aided non-sense syllable speech recognition thresholds in quiet and speech recognition in noise were significantly better at the six-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that NLFC improves audibility for and recognition of high-frequency speech sounds for children with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss. In many cases, improvements found with NLFC increased with a longer period of acclimatization to the technology.

The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research shows that children using cochlear implants experience significant difficulty with speech perception in noisy listening situations. There are several types of input signal processing available for the cochlear implant sound processor; however, there is a paucity of research to support this technology for children. The primary objective of this study was to examine the potential benefits of 2 types of input signal processing, adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) as compared with autosensitivity (ASC) plus ADRO for children using Cochlear Corporation implants. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures design. SETTING: Outpatient nonprofit foundation providing audiology services and auditory-verbal therapy. PATIENTS: Eleven children, aged 4 years 4 months to 12 years, with unilateral or bilateral Cochlear Limited implants. All children used their cochlear implant(s) for at least 1 year, had no additional disabilities, were enrolled in preschool or elementary school, and had age-appropriate receptive and expressive language. INTERVENTION: All children used Cochlear Limited cochlear implants with either the Nucleus Freedom or Nucleus 5 cochlear implant sound processor. Performance was assessed while these children used ADRO-only input processing and ASC+ADRO input processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception of PBK-50 monosyllabic words in quiet and BKB-SIN sentences in noise was measured for each child. In the noise conditions, children were using the ADRO-only or ASC+ADRO input signal processing strategies. The data in quiet were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and the conditions in noise were compared using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All children demonstrated word recognition in quiet at or above 90% correct. In noise, sentence-perception performance in the ASC+ADRO condition was significantly better than that in the ADRO-alone condition. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest substantial benefit from combining 2 types of input signal processing, ASC and ADRO, for children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Specifically, signal processing to adjust the sensitivity of the sound processor microphone automatically has substantial positive effects on speech-perception thresholds in noise.

Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.

The primary aim of this study was to examine the effects of frequency-modulated (FM) settings on speech-recognition performance in noise of listeners using two different cochlear implant speech processors. Participants included eight users of ESPrit 3G speech processors and nine users of Auria speech processors. A modified adaptive-testing paradigm was used to assess speech recognition in noise with the cochlear implant and FM system at four receiver-gain settings: +6, +10, +14, or +20. In the no-FM condition, performance differences were not detected between the two processor groups. In the FM conditions, significantly better performance was found for participants with the Auria processor compared to those using the ESPrit 3G processor. Increases in receiver gain did not significantly improve speech recognition of participants using ESPrit 3G processors, but did significantly influence performance for those using Auria processors. For Auria users, the +6 setting resulted in significantly poorer performance than all other conditions, and optimal FM performance was found in the +14 and +20 gain settings. Clinical recommendations will be provided according to results of the study.