Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cell Rep ; 21(8): 2304-2312, 2017 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29166618

RESUMEN

In the process of drug development, in vitro studies do not always adequately predict human-specific drug responsiveness in clinical trials. Here, we applied the advantage of human iPSC-derived neurons, which offer human-specific drug responsiveness, to screen and evaluate therapeutic candidates for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Using AD patient neurons with nearly 100% purity from iPSCs, we established a robust and reproducible assay for amyloid ß peptide (Aß), a pathogenic molecule in AD, and screened a pharmaceutical compound library. We acquired 27 Aß-lowering screen hits, prioritized hits by chemical structure-based clustering, and selected 6 leading compounds. Next, to maximize the anti-Aß effect, we selected a synergistic combination of bromocriptine, cromolyn, and topiramate as an anti-Aß cocktail. Finally, using neurons from familial and sporadic AD patients, we found that the cocktail showed a significant and potent anti-Aß effect on patient cells. This human iPSC-based platform promises to be useful for AD drug development.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/inmunología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Neuronas/patología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/inmunología , Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/inmunología , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos
2.
Stem Cell Reports ; 4(4): 727-43, 2015 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772473

RESUMEN

As the quintessential reprogramming model, OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC re-wire somatic cells to achieve induced pluripotency. Yet, subtle differences in methodology confound comparative studies of reprogramming mechanisms. Employing transposons, we systematically assessed cellular and molecular hallmarks of mouse somatic cell reprogramming by various polycistronic cassettes. Reprogramming responses varied in the extent of initiation and stabilization of transgene-independent pluripotency. Notably, the cassettes employed one of two KLF4 variants, differing only by nine N-terminal amino acids, which generated dissimilar protein stoichiometry. Extending the shorter variant by nine N-terminal amino acids or augmenting stoichiometry by KLF4 supplementation rescued both protein levels and phenotypic disparities, implicating a threshold in determining reprogramming outcomes. Strikingly, global gene expression patterns elicited by published polycistronic cassettes diverged according to each KLF4 variant. Our data expose a Klf4 reference cDNA variation that alters polycistronic factor stoichiometry, predicts reprogramming hallmarks, and guides comparison of compatible public data sets.


Asunto(s)
Reprogramación Celular/genética , Factores de Transcripción de Tipo Kruppel/genética , Células Madre Pluripotentes/citología , Células Madre Pluripotentes/metabolismo , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas/genética , Empalme Alternativo , Animales , Diferenciación Celular , Elementos Transponibles de ADN , Expresión Génica , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Marcación de Gen , Factor 4 Similar a Kruppel , Factores de Transcripción de Tipo Kruppel/química , Ratones , Fenotipo , Isoformas de Proteínas
3.
Dev Growth Differ ; 56(1): 2-13, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24387662

RESUMEN

Genome editing with engineered endonucleases is rapidly becoming a staple method in developmental biology studies. Engineered nucleases permit random or designed genomic modification at precise loci through the stimulation of endogenous double-strand break repair. Homology-directed repair following targeted DNA damage is mediated by co-introduction of a custom repair template, allowing the derivation of knock-out and knock-in alleles in animal models previously refractory to classic gene targeting procedures. Currently there are three main types of customizable site-specific nucleases delineated by the source mechanism of DNA binding that guides nuclease activity to a genomic target: zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR). Among these genome engineering tools, characteristics such as the ease of design and construction, mechanism of inducing DNA damage, and DNA sequence specificity all differ, making their application complementary. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each method, one may make the best choice for their particular purpose.


Asunto(s)
Endodesoxirribonucleasas/metabolismo , Ingeniería Genética/métodos , Genoma/genética , Genómica/métodos , Animales , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Biología Evolutiva/métodos , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA