Introduction of cell salvage to a large obstetric unit: the first six months.

BACKGROUND: We introduced red-cell salvage to our obstetric unit following a two-month period of training and education. We report a service evaluation of the first six months of activity from May to October 2007. METHODS: The indications for using cell salvage were: placenta praevia, suspected placental abruption, multiple pregnancy, multiple repeat caesarean, previous history of post partum haemorrhage, refusal of blood transfusion, caesarean section at full dilatation, low preoperative haemoglobin and at the discretion of the theatre team. RESULTS: The cell saver was used for 46 patients with a blood loss (median; range) of 800 (200-2000) mL and a heterologous transfusion rate of 22% (10 cases). Blood was processed and returned in 19 cases of which nine were emergency and 10 elective. The median volume (range) of blood returned was 390 (200-800) mL. For the unit as a whole the percentage of all theatre cases who received a heterologous transfusion fell from 10.2% for the equivalent time period in the preceding year to 7.9% during the six month period that cell salvage was in use (P=0.126, chi(2)). There were no adverse reactions following the administration of processed blood. CONCLUSION: We have successfully introduced cell salvage to our unit in a relatively short period of time and have used it for the largest series of patients reported in the UK.

Dose response to intrathecal diamorphine for elective caesarean section and compliance with a national audit standard.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind randomised controlled trial investigated the most appropriate dose of intrathecal diamorphine to use with high-dose diclofenac as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for caesarean section under subarachnoid block. We also wished to establish whether it was possible to satisfy the Royal College of Anaesthetists postoperative pain audit recommendation for this patient group. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting for elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block were recruited and divided into four groups. Treatment was standard except that patients were given either placebo or one of three different doses of intrathecal diamorphine (100 microg, 200 microg or 300 microg). All patients were given regular paracetamol, high-dose diclofenac and an hourly subcutaneous diamorphine regimen for breakthrough pain. RESULTS: There was a dose-dependent improvement in analgesia with intrathecal diamorphine. Only 37.9% of patients given 300 microg of intrathecal diamorphine had a visual analogue pain score of 3/10 or less throughout the study. There was a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of itching with intrathecal diamorphine although the incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that for elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block with high dose diclofenac, analgesia was optimal with 300 microg of intrathecal diamorphine. Even the highest dose of intrathecal diamorphine did not achieve the Royal College of Anaesthetists postoperative audit target that 90% of patients should have a pain score of no more than 3/10. We believe that this target is too arduous.

Evaluation of a local anaesthesia regimen following mastectomy.

Breast surgery can be emotionally distressing and physically painful. Acute pain following surgery is often related mainly to the axillary surgery and is aggravated by arm and shoulder movement. We conducted a prospective double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to determine the influence of local anaesthetic irrigation of axillary wound drains on postoperative pain during the first 24 h following a modified Patey mastectomy (mastectomy with complete axillary node clearance). The treatment group received bupivacaine irrigation through the axillary wound drain 4-hourly for 24 h postoperatively. Controls received irrigation with normal saline. Morphine via a patient controlled analgesia pump was used for postoperative analgesia. Morphine consumption, visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores were recorded. There were no statistical differences in morphine requirements or pain scores between the two groups, nor were there differences in anti-emetic or supplemental analgesic consumption. Bupivacaine irrigation used in this manner does not appear to offer an effective contribution to postoperative analgesia.