Glycosides from the leaves of Fraxinus Hubeiensis.

Fraxinus hubeiensis is a plant endemic to China and widely used as folk medicine to treat various diseases. However, its chemical constituents have never been reported sufficiently. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the phytochemical constituents and biological activities of F. hubeiensis leaves. Hence, combined column chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques were used to identify and characterize the secondary metabolites such as a pair of 3-keto-glycoside epimers (1) and (2), along with five known compounds (3 ~ 7). The results of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity exhibited that 1 and 2 had moderate activity with IC50 values of 359.50 and 468.43 µM, respectively, compared to a positive control acarbose with the IC50 value of 164.08 µM. However, Compounds 1-6 were shown to be inactive against the tested microbes.

Chemical Constituents from Fraxinus hupehensis and Their Antifungal and Herbicidal Activities.

The phytochemical investigation of Fraxinus hupehensis led to the isolation and characterization of ten compounds which were identified as fraxin (1), fraxetin (2), esculetin (3), cichoriin (4), euphorbetin (5), kaempferol-3-O-ß-rutinoside (6), oleuropein (7), linoleic acid (8), methyl linoleate (9), and ß-sitosterol (10). Structures of the isolated constituents were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS. All the compounds, except compounds 3 and 4, were isolated for the first time from this plant. Further, this was the first report for the occurrence of compound 5 in the Fraxinus species. Antifungal activity evaluation showed that compound 2 exhibited significant inhibitory effects against Bipolaris maydis, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Alternaria solani with EC50 values of 0.31 ± 0.01 mmol/L, 10.50 ± 0.02 mmol/L, and 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol/L respectively, compared to the positive control, Carbendazim, with its EC50 values of 0.74 ± 0.01 mmol/L, 1.78 ± 0.01 mmol/L and 1.41 ± 0.00 mmol/L. Herbicidal activity tests showed that compounds 8-10 had strong inhibitory effects against the roots of Echinochloa crus-galli with EC50 values of 1.16 ± 0.23 mmol/L, 1.28 ± 0.58 mmol/L and 1.33 ± 0.35 mmol/L respectively, more potently active than that of the positive control, Cyanazine, with its EC50 values of 1.56 ± 0.44 mmol/L. However, none of the compounds proved to be active against the tested bacteria (Erwinia carotovora, Pseudomonas syringae, and Ralstonia solanacearum).