Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Immunol ; 236: 108935, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) with acupoint injection (AI) on the maternal-fetal expression of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), interleukin-10 (IL-10), analgesia effect, and labor outcomes. METHODS: A total of 360 healthy primiparas were randomized into the CSEA+AI group, the CSEA group, the AI group, and the control group (n = 90, each group) according to the labor analgesia methods. RESULTS: Compared to the CSEA group, the CSEA+AI group had significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores, adverse events, dose of ropivacaine/sufentanil, and shorter labor durations. The IL-1ß/IL-10 ratio in maternal peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood was reduced in the CSEA+AI group compared with the CSEA group. CONCLUSION: The combination of CSEA and AI can reduce the ratio of IL-1ß/ IL-10 in maternal peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood, which can effectively relieve labor pain.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Anestesia Epidural , Puntos de Acupuntura , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Femenino , Sangre Fetal , Humanos , Interleucina-10 , Interleucina-1beta , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Chin J Integr Med ; 28(3): 257-262, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731434

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore if acupoint injection can improve analgesic effects or delivery outcomes in parturients who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor analgesia. METHODS: A total of 307 participants were prospectively collected from July 2017 to December 2019. The participants were randomized into the combined acupoint injection with CSEA plus PCEA group (AICP group, n=168) and CSEA plus PCEA group (CP group, n=139) for labor analgesia using a random number table. Both groups received CSEA plus PCEA at cervical dilation 3 cm during labor process, and parturients of the AICP group were implemented acupoint injection for which bilateral acupoint of Zusanli (ST 36) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) were selected in addition. The primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and the secondary outcomes were obstetric outcomes and requirement of anesthetics doses. Safety evaluations were performed after intervention. RESULTS: The VAS scores were significantly lower in the AICP group than in the CP group at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after labor analgesia (all P<0.05). The latent phase of the AICP group was shorter than that of the CP group (P<0.05). There were less additional anesthetics consumption, lower incidences of uterine atony, fever, pruritus and urinary retention in the AICP group than those in the CP group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupoint injection combined CSEA plus PCEA for labor analgesia can decrease the anesthetic consumption, improve analgesic quality, and reduce adverse reactions in the parturients. (Registration No. ChiMCTR-2000003120).


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Obstétrica , Anestésicos , Trabajo de Parto , Puntos de Acupuntura , Analgesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/efectos adversos , Anestésicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA