Direct Visualization of the His Bundle Pacing Lead Placement by 3-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping: Technique, Anatomy, and Practical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) remains technically challenging and is currently guided by electrograms and 2-dimensional fluoroscopy. Our objective was to describe a new technique for HBP directly guided by electroanatomic mapping (EAM). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were included. The atrioventricular septum was mapped via EAM, and His bundle (HB) electrograms, selective, and nonselective HB capture sites were tagged. Pacing leads were connected to EAM, navigated to tagged HB target sites and deployed. Intracardiac electrograms and pacing parameters were recorded. Lead location was tagged on the cloud of HB sites, which was divided into 3 arbitrary segments. In 5 patients, atrioventricular nodal ablation was performed with direct visualization of the HBP lead by EAM. RESULTS: Reproducible navigation of the pacing lead to predetermined HBP locations guided by EAM was achieved in all patients. The lead was successfully deployed in 25 patients. HB cloud area was 360 (212) mm2. There was no correlation between HBP threshold and lead location on the His cloud. The intracardiac electrograms atrial/ventricular ratio at the lead deployment site correlated with its EAM position on the His cloud ( P=0.045). Procedure, fluoroscopy, and mapping times were 116.0 (38.8), 8.6 (6.3), and 9.0 (11.4) minutes, respectively. HBP threshold at implant was 1.5 (2.3) V at 1.5 (1.0) ms. Distance between HB lead and ablation sites was 10.0 (1.3) mm in patients undergoing atrioventricular nodal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Direct guidance of HBP by EAM allows for direct visualization of the pacing lead on the HB cloud and reproducible navigation to predetermined HB capture sites. Intracardiac electrograms atrial/ventricular ratio at the lead deployment site correlates with His cloud location. EAM can be applied during standard HBP procedures or combined with atrioventricular nodal ablation.

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation with a synchronized external low energy shock post-pulmonary vein isolation predicts recurrent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) with burst pacing after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is associated with recurrent AF. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether an external 30 Joule (J) shock synchronized to the R wave, during the vulnerable period of atrial repolarization, is able to risk-stratify patients further for AF recurrence after PV isolation. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients underwent PV isolation for AF. Atrial burst pacing was performed after PV isolation. In patients without AF induced by burst pacing, a biphasic external 30 J shock synchronized to the R wave was delivered as a further test for inducible AF. Patients were followed for a mean of 16 months, and recurrent AF was defined as more than 10 sec of AF on ambulatory monitoring. RESULTS: AF was induced in 19 (16%) of patients with burst pacing. Eighty-one patients who were noninducible with burst pacing had a 30 J shock administered, which induced AF in 16 (20%). In follow-up, 21% of patients who were noninducible with burst pacing or low-energy shock vs 54% who were inducible with either test developed recurrent AF at one year (HR 3.18, P = 0.0004 on multivariate analysis). Among patients who were noninducible with burst pacing, 18% who were noninducible with a low-energy shock vs 60% who were inducible with shock developed recurrent AF at one year (HR = 4.63, P = 0.0006 on multivariate analysis). CONCLUSION: Inducibility of AF by a 30 J shock delivered during atrial repolarization after PV isolation may predict AF recurrence. Evaluation of inducibility of AF with burst pacing and a biphasic external synchronized shock after PV isolation may help guide postprocedure management.

Bi-directional electrical pulmonary vein isolation as an endpoint for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: Various approaches to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have shown variable efficacy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of routine isolation of all PVs using an endpoint of bi-directional electrical block. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 85 consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation for symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Complete isolation of all PVs was confirmed by demonstration of bi-directional block: (a) loss of all PV potentials, and (b) failure to capture the left atrium by pacing 10-14 bipolar pairs of electrodes on a circumferential catheter placed at the entrance of the PV at 10 mA with 2 ms pulse width. Induction of AF by burst pacing was attempted after PV isolation. RESULTS: Freedom from symptomatic or asymptomatic AF (detected by event recorder or Holter monitor) was present in 85% and 76% of patients at 6 and 12 months. Additional mitral isthmus or posterior left atrial lines were performed in seven patients with inducible atrial arrhythmias after PV isolation. Atrial tachycardia occurred in three of these patients during long-term follow-up and in two of the 78 patients without additional ablation. CONCLUSION: The use of bi-directional block circumferentially across all PV ostia as an electrophysiological endpoint may improve results of PV isolation for paroxysmal AF. Avoidance of routine additional left atrial ablation lines may decrease the risk of atrial tachycardia and esophageal fistula.