Soft tissue sarcoma: why not treated?

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are uncommon malignancies and elderly STS patients have been reported to receive less definitive treatment compared to young STS patients. The present study was performed to investigate whether withholding treatment was based on disease specific aspects, patients' general health condition, comorbidity or a combination of these. METHODS: Patients with primary STS, registered by the Comprehensive Cancer Center North-Netherlands (CCCN) from 1989 to 1999, were analyzed retrospectively with regard to the inclusion-criteria: no primary anti-tumor treatment. RESULTS: From 1989 to 1999, 620 patients (including 56 Kaposi sarcoma) were registered with primary STS. Seventy-six patients (13%) were registered as untreated. Nineteen patients were excluded. Records of 57 patients, median age 71 years (range 23-92, 40 patients > or =65 years, 17 patients < 65 years) were examined. The reasons for no treatment were irresectability of the sarcoma (65%), metastatic disease (11%), comorbidity (4%), poor general health (5%), death prior to therapy (7%) and refusal of therapy (3%) (motivation not documented in 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen percent of all STS patients within the CCCN region were not treated, 70% of these patients were elderly. Withholding treatment was mostly disease-related (76%), e.g. irresectable retroperitoneal STS or metastatic disease; for 19% of the patients, it was related to their poor general health. The decision to refrain from cancer treatment was justifiable in all these STS patients.

A new in vitro assay for quantitation of chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

Patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) are at risk of severe mucositis. Most prevention studies evaluate the degree of mucositis on clinical, and therefore subjective, measurements. The aim of this study was to develop an objective in vitro assay of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Twelve patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma received HD-CT followed by peripheral stem cell reinfusion. Before and twice weekly after HD-CT, the mucosa was evaluated by an oral washing, a buccal smear and the World Health Organization (WHO) toxicity grading; furthermore, blood leucocyte levels were determined. For the oral washings, the percentage of viable epithelial cells was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion and leucocytes were counted by fluorescence microscopy after incubation with acridine orange. Maturity of buccal cells was assessed by staining buccal smears for morphology according to Papanicolaou (Whitacker D and Williams V, 1994). Eight healthy volunteers served as controls. The mean percentage (+/- s.e.m.) of viable oral epithelial cells was stable in controls (44 +/- 2%). In patients, they increased after HD-CT, which was significant after day 7 compared with pretreatment (P < or = 0.05). In addition, a shift from mature to immature epithelial cells in buccal smears was observed. Oral leucocyte levels were closely correlated with the blood leucocyte counts. The WHO score followed the results of these other evaluations with some delay. The viability of buccal cells obtained by oral washings increases after HD-CT. This is possibly because of desquamation of the upper oral mucosa layer, with a shift from mature to more immature cells. These data can be quantitated, and this assay may therefore be useful in studies aimed at prevention of mucositis.