Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS: A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.

Management of colorectal peritoneal metastases: Expert opinion.

When peritoneal metastases are diagnosed (strong agreement of experts): (i) seek advice from a multidisciplinary coordination meeting (MCM) with large experience in peritoneal disease (e.g. BIG RENAPE network); (ii) transfer (or not) the patient to a referral center with experience in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), according to the advice of the MCM. With regard to systemic chemotherapy (strong agreement of experts): (i) it should be performed both before and after surgery, (ii) for no longer than 6 months; (iii) without postoperative anti-angiogenetic drugs. With regard to cytoreductive surgery (strong agreement of experts): (i) Radical surgery requires a xiphopubic midline incision; (ii) no cytoreductive surgery via laparoscopy. With regard to HIPEC: HIPEC can be proposed for trials outside an HIPEC referral center (weak agreement between experts): (i) if surgery is radical; (ii) if the expected morbidity is "reasonable"; (iii) if the indication for HIPEC was suggested by a MCM, and; (iv) mitomycin is preferred to oxaliplatin (which cannot be recommended) for this indication.

Postoperative irinotecan in resected stage II-III rectal cancer: final analysis of the French R98 Intergroup trial†.

BACKGROUD: The R98 trial explores the addition of irinotecan to a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) adjuvant regimen in optimally resected stages II-III rectal cancers. We report the updated long-term results. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point. PATIENST AND METHODS: Between March 1999 and December 2005, 357 patients were randomized: 178 in 5-FU/LV and 179 in LV5-FU2 + irinotecan arm. The trial was stratified by control arm: Mayo Clinic regimen or LV5-FU2 regimen. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven randomized patients were evaluable for efficacy. With a follow-up of 156 months, the DFS was in favour of experimental arm but did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80, P = 0.154]. The same was observed for overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.87, P = 0.433). The 5-year DFS was 58% in the control arm and 63% in the experimental arm. The 5-year OS was 74% in the control arm and 75% in the experimental arm. Patients allocated to the experimental arm had more grade 3-4 neutropenia when compared with the LV5-FU2 arm (33% versus 6%, P = 0.03), but not when compared with the Mayo Clinic arm (33% versus 36%, P = 0.84). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea tended to be higher in the experimental arm, but analyses stratified by control arm or by radiotherapy failed to show significant differences across strata (test for interaction P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Even though a benefit of irinotecan in subgroups of patients cannot be excluded, due to early termination and lack of power, the study does not support the addition of irinotecan to 5-FU/LV in routine in patients with resected stage II-III rectal cancer.

Sorafenib and irinotecan (NEXIRI) as second- or later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS-mutated tumours: a multicentre Phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of combined sorafenib and irinotecan (NEXIRI) as second- or later-line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), who had progressed after irinotecan-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In Phase I, in a 3+3 dose escalation schedule, patients received irinotecan (125, 150 or 180 mg m(-2) every 2 weeks), in combination with 400 mg sorafenib b.d. The primary end point was the maximum-tolerated dose of irinotecan. In Phase II, the primary end point was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: Phase I included 10 patients (median age 63 (49-73)); no dose-limiting toxicity was seen. In Phase II, 54 patients (median age 60 (43-80) years) received irinotecan 180 mg m(-)(2) every 2 weeks with sorafenib 400 mg b.d. Nine patients (17%) remained on full-dose sorafenib. The DCR was 64.9% (95% CI, 51-77). Median PFS and OS were 3.7 (95% CI, 3.2-4.7) and 8.0 (95% CI, 4.8-9.7) months, respectively. Toxicities included Grade 3 diarrhoea (37%), neutropenia (18%), hand-foot syndrome (13%) and Grade 4 neutropenia (17%). CONCLUSION: The NEXIRI regimen showed promising activity as second- or later-line treatment in this heavily pretreated mCRC population (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00989469).

Clinical impact of intesified 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy using a prospective pharmacokinetically-guided dosing approach: comparative study in elderly and non-elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

We compared clinical outcome and pharmacokinetic (pK) parameters of a new pharmacokinetically-guided dosing strategy in two groups of patients (age < or >65 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We retrospectively analyzed all the patients with mCRC, receiving standard LV5FU2 regimen during cycle-1, intensified from cycle-2 onwards according to an adaptation schedule based on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value (mg.h/l.m(2)) of 5-FU measured during cycle-1. Among the 103 eligible patients, the 48 elderly (median age 70 range 65-80) did not differ significantly from the 55 non-elderly patients (median age 59 range 33-64) in pPK parameters (including AUC at cycle-1 and cycle-2), efficacy (objective response rate of 27% [16.1-40.9] in younger and 35% [22.2-50.5] in older patients, p = 0.4) and tolerability (33.3% of overall grade 3-4 toxicities in older patients and 34.5% in younger, p = 0.9). Our data indicated high dose-intensity values, not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients. it was feasible to increase the 5-fU continuous infusion dose in 43/55 (78%) younger and 40/48 (83%) older patients (p=0.509) and even to double it in half of the patients of both groups. Aging did not seem to limit intensified chemotherapy or to affect the pK behavior of the 5-FU.

A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA) in colorectal cancer patients with completely resectable liver-limited metastases (LMCRC) offers clinical benefit over surgery alone. This phase III trial compared FOLFIRI with simplified 5-FU/FA in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: LMCRC patients were randomized to receive every 14 days, FA, 400 mg/m2 infused over 2 h, followed by 5-FU as a 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, followed by continuous 5-FU infusion, 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h (LV5FUs) with or without irinotecan: 180 mg/m2 infusion (FOLFIRI). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: Treated patients (n = 306) were balanced for critical prognostic factors in each arm. Median DFS in patients receiving LV5FUs was 21.6 versus 24.7 months for FOLFIRI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, log-rank P = 0.44]. No significant differences were found in OS. A trend was observed for improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFIRI within 42 days of surgery (HR 0.75, P = 0.17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects were more common in patients treated with FOLFIRI versus LV5FUs (47% versus 30%) with neutropenia being most common (23% versus 7%). CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI in the adjuvant treatment of LMCRC showed no significant improvement in DFS compared with LV5FUs.

A phase III randomised trial of LV5FU2 + irinotecan versus LV5FU2 alone in adjuvant high-risk colon cancer (FNCLCC Accord02/FFCD9802).

BACKGROUND: This multicenter adjuvant phase III trial evaluated the addition of irinotecan to LV5FU2 in colon cancer patients at high risk of relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 400 patients with histologically proven primary colon cancer with postoperative N1 detected by occlusion/perforation or N2 were randomised to: A-LV5FU2 [leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 2-h infusion, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) bolus, 600 mg/m(2) 22-h continuous infusion, days 1 and 2] or B-LV5FU2 + IRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) 90-min infusion day 1 + LV5FU2) fortnightly for 12 cycles. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63 months. Significantly more T4 tumours and 15 or more positive lymph nodes were observed in arm B. 5-FU relative dose intensity (RDI) was >0.80 for 94% and 77% in arms A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). Irinotecan RDI was >0.80 for 70% patients. There were more grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in arm B (4% versus 28%, P < 0.001). The 3-year DFS was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53% to 66%] and 51% (95% CI 44% to 58) in arms A and B, respectively. No difference was observed [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, 95% CI 0.85-1.47, P = 0.42] even when adjusted for prognostic factors (adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.74-1.31, P = 0.92). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 67% (95% CI 59% to 73%) and 61% (95% CI 53% to 67%) in arms A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant LV5FU2 + IRI compared with LV5FU2 alone in patients at high risk of relapse showed no improvement in DFS and OS.

Cost consequences of adjuvant capecitabine, Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens for stage III colon cancer in the French setting.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the cost consequences of oral capecitabine and two different intravenous regimens of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (de Gramont and Mayo Clinic regimens) as adjuvant therapy in stage III colon cancer in France. METHODS: Clinical efficacy and safety data were taken from published clinical trials. Medical resource use was estimated from published data and expert opinion. Direct costs (drug acquisition, inpatient and home drug administration, laboratory tests, transportation, and management of adverse events) were considered over a time horizon of 46 months (3.8 years). The perspective taken was that of the French Sickness Funds. RESULTS: In patients treated with capecitabine, relapse-free survival was 1.3 months longer than with the Mayo Clinic regimen, which has been shown to be as effective as the de Gramont regimen. In the base case analysis, capecitabine was less costly (3,654 EUR/patient) than the Mayo Clinic (10,481 EUR/ patient) and de Gramont (7,204 EUR/patient) regimens. In the sensitivity analysis, capecitabine remained dominant except when the intravenous regimens were assumed to be administered at home in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In France, capecitabine is more effective and less costly than both the Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1991 to April 1994, 75 patients with unresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver were included in this multicenter study to receive intra-arterial hepatic pirarubicin and a systemic monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid. Sixty-four patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis and 61 in the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Tolerance of this regimen was rather good; however, functional catheter problems were observed in 29 patients (45%) resulting in failure of HAI in 21 cases (33%) after a median of three cycles; vomiting grade 3 was present in 12.5% of patients, neutropenia grade 4 in 23% and alopecia grade 3 in 19%. The overall response rate was 31.9% in intention-to-treat analysis, and 39.3% in per-protocol analysis. Extrahepatic progression was reported in only 21.7% of patients. Time to hepatic progression and extra-hepatic progression was 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, in intention-to-treat analysis, and 11 and 18 months, respectively, in per-protocol analysis. Median survival was 19 and 20 months in intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the combination of intra-arterial pirarubicin and intravenous chemotherapy demonstrated some efficacy and good tolerance in the treatment of isolated colorectal liver metastases. This treatment seems to prevent extra-hepatic spread and prolong survival time. The results of this study have to be confirmed by new trials using more active systemic chemotherapy.

Colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting: perspectives on treatment and the role of prognostic factors.

In patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) who have undergone potentially curative resection, adjuvant treatment with 6 months' of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) is generally accepted as standard treatment and leads to a 5% to 10% improvement in absolute survival when compared with a no-chemotherapy control. In stage II CRC, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be established. In metastatic CRC, randomized trials of irinotecan have consistently demonstrated that use of the drug, either alone or in combination with 5-FU/FA, prolongs survival. To investigate whether this benefit can be extended to patients with earlier disease, a series of multicenter trials are randomizing stage III colon cancer patients to adjuvant 5-FU/FA regimens with or without the addition of irinotecan. The role of adjuvant irinotecan is also being assessed in stage II colon cancer and in patients with rectal tumors. The risk/benefit ratio of adjuvant therapy in both stage III and stage II disease would be decreased if patients at the highest risk of relapse could be identified. Data from retrospective analyses suggest that DNA indexes, angiogenesis and some genetic/biological markers (loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 and the presence of microsatellite instability) identify prognostic differences in colon cancer patients. Their value as a guide to the intensity of adjuvant therapy required should be tested by randomized trial, as should the use of markers such as thymidilate synthase overexpression as a means of tailoring drug choice to tumor characteristics.

[A comparison of serum Cyfra 21-1 and SCC AG in the diagnosis of squamous cell esophageal carcinoma]. / Evaluation comparative du Cyfra 21-1 et du squamous cell carcinoma dans les carcinomes épidermoïdes de l'oesophage.

Cyfra 21-1 is a useful marker in lung cancer. The only tumor marker used at the present time in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is SCC (squamous cell carcinoma). In this study we evaluated the pre-treatment sensitivity and specificity of these two markers in this setting. Cyfra 21-1 and SCC were determined by radio-immunoassay on 76 patients having OSCC. Staging was done according to the UICC 1978 classification based on endoscopy, baryum enema and CT scan. The sensitivity of Cyfra 21-1 is better at the 1.5 ng/ml level (54%) than at the usual reported level of 3.6 ng/ml (26%). The best level for sensitivity of SCC is 1.5 ng/ml. At these levels, sensitivity of Cyfra 21-1 and SCC for advanced stages (T3 or M1) are respectively 72% and 50%. The specificity of Cyfra 21-1 and SCC for stages T1 or T2 are respectively 53% and 73%. The combination of these two markers increase sensitivity at 64% for all stages and at 89% for advanced stages (T3 or M1) and is a significant prognostic factor for survival. This study confirms the value of Cyfra 21-1 in OSCC at the normal level of 1.5 ng/ml. The combination with SC improves the results. We now need to evaluate the role of these two markers in the follow up of oesophageal carcinoma.

Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had metastatic CRC and a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. CPT-11 was administered over a 90-minute infusion every 2 weeks at a range of dose levels (100, 120, 150, 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m(2)). LV5FU2 was started 1 hour after the end of the biweekly CPT-11 infusion and was also administered on day 2. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were entered onto this trial; 549 cycles were administered. The MTD was not reached at 260 mg/m(2), and a dose level of 300 mg/m(2) was added. The MTD as defined in the protocol was not reached at this dose level either, but all patients had cycles delayed and/or required a dose reduction. This dose was deemed to be the MTD. To take into account both the toxicity of and compliance with the biweekly schedule, the recommended CPT-11 dose was established at 180 to 200 mg/m(2). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels, with an objective response rate of 22%. Median time to progression was 6.3 months and overall survival was 15 months. CONCLUSION: The biweekly CPT-11/LV5FU2 combination is feasible and safe, without overlapping toxicity. CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies.

Plasma and salivary pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-FU bolus plus continuous infusion with high-dose folinic acid.

The comparative saliva/plasma pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were investigated in 21 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving high-dose folinic acid (LV (leucovorin) 200 mg/m2) followed by 5-FU bolus (400 mg/m2) and continuous infusion (600, 750, 900 or 1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2. Quantitation of unchanged drug was assessed by a highly specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Large patient-to-patient variations in plasma and saliva 5-FU concentrations were observed. Saliva pharmacokinetics could be described using a bi-exponential pattern. The half-life of the rapid phase averaged 8.0 min, and was of the same order of magnitude as the 5-FU elimination half-life determined from plasma data. The half-life of the terminal part of the curve averaged 8 h; such decrease in salivary concentrations could be due to changes in salivary gland function caused by 5-FU, which results in reduced salivary flow rate. Between individual 5-FU concentrations in parotid saliva and plasma a statistically significant straight line could be fitted with a coefficient of correlation of 0.675. Moreover, the risk of developing 5-FU-related mucositis was significantly linked to 5-FU salivary exposure. Diarrhoea was the most frequent toxicity encountered during the trial.

A prospective randomized study comparing high- and low-dose leucovorin combined with same-dose 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer.

Although the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin is well established for advanced colorectal cancer, the question of the most effective regimen and optimal dose of leucovorin remains unanswered. This prospective randomized trial compares low-dose (group 1) and high-dose (group 2) leucovorin, combined with the same dose of 5-FU to determine whether high-dose leucovorin was more beneficial than low-dose on overall survival. Inclusion criteria were: unresectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma, with or without evaluable tumor response; a performance status of less than grade 3 (World Health Organization classification); and no previous chemotherapy for metastases. Forty-two patients were randomized in group 1 (leucovorin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1 through 5) and 41 patients in group 2 (leucovorin, 200 mg/m2/day, days 1-5). All the patients in the two groups received a 1-hour infusion of 400 mg/m2/day 5-FU every 4 weeks. The two groups were matched with no statistically significant differences in gender ratio, site of primary tumor, performance status, and tumor extent. Toxicity in the two regimens was low and not significantly different between the two groups. Overall median survival was 346 days in group 1 and 323 days in group 2 and was not significantly different between the two groups. At 1 year, the test of equivalence was significant (p < 0.01), demonstrating an absence of more than 20% benefit in 1-year survival for the high-dose regimen. The use of high-dose leucovorin combined with 5-FU in the 5-day regimen does not significantly improve overall survival for patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase-I/II radio-immunotherapy study with Iodine-131-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody F6 F(ab')2 in patients with non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Experimental studies in nude mice with human colon-carcinoma grafts demonstrated the therapeutic efficiency of F(ab')2 fragments to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) labeled with a high dose of 131Iodine. A phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 131I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments (131I-F(ab')2) from anti-CEA monoclonal antibody F6, its limiting organ toxicity and tumor uptake. Ten patients with non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (9 detected by CT scan and 1 by laparotomy) were treated with 131I-F(ab')2, doses ranging from 87 mCi to 300 mCi for the first 5 patients, with a constant 300-mCi dose for the last 5 patients. For all the patients, autologous bone marrow was harvested and stored before treatment. Circulating CEA ranged from 2 to 126 ng/ml. No severe adverse events were observed during or immediately following infusion of therapeutic doses. The 9 patients with radiologic evidence of liver metastases showed uptake of 131I-F(ab')2 in the metastases, as observed by single-photon-emission tomography. The only toxicity was hematologic, and no severe aplasia was observed when up to 250 mCi was infused. At the 300-mCi dose, 5 out of 6 patients presented grade-3 or -4 hematologic toxicity, with a nadir for neutrophils and thrombocytes ranging from 25 to 35 days after infusion. In these 5 cases, bone marrow was re-infused. No clinical complications were observed during aplasia. The tumor response could be evaluated in 9 out of 10 patients. One patient showed a partial response of one small liver metastasis (2 cm in diameter) and a stable evolution of the other metastases, 2 patients had stable disease, and 6 showed tumor progression at the time of evaluation (2 or 3 months after injection) by CT scan. This phase-I/II study demonstrated that a dose of 300 mCi of 131I-F(ab')2 from the anti-CEA Mab F6 is well tolerated with bone-marrow rescue, whereas a dose of 200 mCi can be infused without severe bone-marrow toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-FUra bolus plus continuous infusion with high dose folinic acid (LV5FU2).

The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) were investigated in 16 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving high-dose folinic acid (LV 200 mg/m2) followed by 5-FUra bolus (400 mg/m2) and continuous infusion (600 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2. Quantitation of unchanged drug was assessed by a highly specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method. The concentrations of 5-FUra at the end of the loading dose averaged 30.7 +/- 13.2 micrograms/ml (i.e., 236 microM). The steady-state plasma concentration averaged 0.31 +/- 0.11 microgram/ml (i.e., 2.4 microM). 5-FUra plasma levels declined rapidly after the end of infusion with an apparent elimination half-life of 7.08 +/- 3.21 minutes. Clearance ranged from 776 to 3023 ml/min/m2. Large patient-to-patient variations in plasma 5-FUra concentrations were observed. No toxicity greater than WHO grade 2 was seen. One patient experienced grade 1 stomatitis and two others experienced grade 1 and 2 myelosuppression. One patient developed diarrhoea and another suffered asthenia. Nausea and vomiting were observed in 5 patients.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma--a phase II trial with combined continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil and bolus cisplatinum.

Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinomas (LAGC) have a poor prognosis, particularly when tumours are bulky, located in the cardia or in the event of locoregional lymph node involvement. Patients bearing these tumours were entered in a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, combining continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (1000 mg/m2 for 5 days) and cisplatinum (CDDP) (100 mg/m2 on day 2) repeated every 4 weeks, for one to six cycles according to response and tolerance. 30 patients have been entered, 26 after clinical evaluation (CAT scan and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy) and 4 with unresectable tumours at prior laparotomy. Median age was 60 years, 15/30 patients had a tumour of the cardia, 15/30 had enlarged lymph nodes and 7/30 had linitis plastica (diffuse type). A mean number of three cycles was administered (range 1-6). 27 of the 30 patients were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response (CR) and 14 a partial response (56%; 95% confidence interval 38-74%). No patient had tumour progression, and only 1/6 with linitis plastica responded. 28 patients underwent surgery, and 23 had a macroscopically complete resection (77% of the 30 entered patients); RO resections were performed in 60% of the cases, mainly after an objective response (13/15 versus 4/12 in nonresponders). No pathological CR were seen. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in eight cycles (5 patients), with five septic complications and one death due to toxicity. Four postoperative complications were observed: 2 cases of severe pneumonia and 2 subphrenic abscesses. One postoperative death, due to intravascular disseminated coagulation, was observed at day 30. Median survival was 16 months and the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival was 67, 42 and 38%, respectively. Patients with linitis plastica had a significantly shorter survival (P < 0.002). We conclude that neodjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in LAGC, although randomised trials are warranted to demonstrate its efficacy on survival and resection rates.