Trends in laboratory test volumes for Medicare Part B reimbursements, 2000-2010.

CONTEXT: Changes in reimbursements for clinical laboratory testing may help us assess the effect of various variables, such as testing recommendations, market forces, changes in testing technology, and changes in clinical or laboratory practices, and provide information that can influence health care and public health policy decisions. To date, however, there has been no report, to our knowledge, of longitudinal trends in national laboratory test use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Medicare Part B-reimbursed volumes of selected laboratory tests per 10,000 enrollees from 2000 through 2010. DESIGN: Laboratory test reimbursement volumes per 10,000 enrollees in Medicare Part B were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (Baltimore, Maryland). The ratio of the most recent (2010) reimbursed test volume per 10,000 Medicare enrollees, divided by the oldest data (usually 2000) during this decade, called the volume ratio, was used to measure trends in test reimbursement. Laboratory tests with a reimbursement claim frequency of at least 10 per 10,000 Medicare enrollees in 2010 were selected, provided there was more than a 50% change in test reimbursement volume during the 2000-2010 decade. We combined the reimbursed test volumes for the few tests that were listed under more than one code in the Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois). A 2-sided Poisson regression, adjusted for potential overdispersion, was used to determine P values for the trend; trends were considered significant at P < .05. RESULTS: Tests with the greatest decrease in reimbursement volumes were electrolytes, digoxin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lithium, with volume ratios ranging from 0.27 to 0.64 (P < .001). Tests with the greatest increase in reimbursement volumes were meprobamate, opiates, methadone, phencyclidine, amphetamines, cocaine, and vitamin D, with volume ratios ranging from 83 to 1510 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although reimbursement volumes increased for most of the selected tests, other tests exhibited statistically significant downward trends in annual reimbursement volumes. The observed changes in reimbursement volumes may be explained by disease prevalence and severity, patterns of drug use, clinical or laboratory practices, and testing recommendations and guidelines, among others. These data may be useful to policy makers, health systems researchers, laboratory directors, and industry scientists to understand, address, and anticipate trends in laboratory testing in the Medicare population.

Prospective study of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) variant C677T and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among 6000 US adults.

BACKGROUND: The association between blood homocysteine concentration and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains controversial, but few studies have examined the association between MTHFR C677T (a proxy for high homocysteine concentration) and death from CVD. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine associations of MTHFR C677T, a proxy for high homocysteine concentrations, with CVD mortality and with all-cause mortality in a national representative prospective cohort of the US adult population before the introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification of flour. DESIGN: We used Mendelian randomization to examine the association of MTHFR C677T with cause-specific mortality in 5925 participants by accessing the NHANES III (1991-1994) Linked Mortality File (through 2006). RESULTS: A comparison of homozygotes at baseline showed that individuals with a TT genotype had a 2.2-µmol/L higher homocysteine and a 1.4-ng/mL lower folate concentration, respectively, than did those with a CC genotype. The TT genotype frequency varied from 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7, 2.0) in non-Hispanic blacks and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.6, 14.0) in non-Hispanic whites to 19.4% (95% CI: 16.7, 22.3) in Mexican Americans. After adjustment for ethnic group and other CVD risk factors, the MTHFR C677T TT genotype was associated with significantly lower CVD mortality (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50, 0. 95) but had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.05). After stratification by period of follow-up, the inverse association of MTHFR with CVD mortality was significant only in the period after introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification. CONCLUSION: The inverse association of MTHFR with CVD mortality was unexpected and highlights the need for caution in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies, which, like other observational studies, can be influenced by chance, bias, or confounding.