Pace capture and adenosine triphosphate provocation are complementary rather than mutually exclusive methods to ensure durable pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked dormant conduction (DC) and pacing for unexcitability are used to identify conduction gaps along the ablation lines after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI). We aim to determine whether ATP provocation and pacing are interchangeable as endpoints for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 107 patients with PAF were randomly divided into two groups after completion of CPVI. In group I (A-P group, n = 53), ATP was administered first. If DC was uncovered, additional ablation was performed until ATP tests were negative. Bipolar pacing along the ablation line was performed subsequently. In group II (P-A group, n = 54), the same protocol was used, but the pacing and the ATP tests were performed in the opposite sequence. The 12-month ablation outcomes of all patients were compared with those of a historical control group of 107 patients with PAF in whom only ATP test was performed. Regardless of which test was performed first, the other modality still identified conduction gaps. In group I, pacing maneuvers identified gaps in 49% (n = 26) of patients who had negative ATP tests. In group II, ATP tests uncovered DC in 18.5% (n = 10) of patients in whom pacing identified no gaps. After 12 months, a higher proportion of patients (91.6%) were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with the historical control group (81.3%; P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Pacing along the ablation lines and ATP provocation are complementary tests for evaluating the durability of CPVI and can lead to better long-term outcomes when used in combination.

Additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation after pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the additional efficacy of CFAEs ablation after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Trials were identified in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, reviews, and reference lists of relevant papers. Controlled cohort studies comparing the long-term efficacy of combined CFAEs plus PVAI ablation with PVAI alone were included. The primary end point was the maintenance of sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Seven controlled trials (9 comparisons) with a total of 622 participants (332 patients underwent PVAI plus CFAE ablation and 330 patients underwent PVAI alone) were included in the meta-analysis. In an overall pooled estimate, compared with PVI alone, long-term rates of sinus rhythm maintenance (relative risk, 1.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.33, P=0.019) were increased by additional CFAE ablation. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that additional CFAEs ablation increased rates of sinus rhythm maintenance in nonparoxysmal AF (relative risk, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.75; P=0.022), whereas had no effect on patients with paroxysmal AF (relative risk, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.18; P=0.528). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant CFAE ablation in addition to standard PVAI increases the rate of long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in nonparoxysmal AF patients after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs but does not provide additional benefit to sinus rhythm maintenance in paroxysmal AF patients.