Predicting combinative drug pairs via multiple classifier system with positive samples only.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Due to the synergistic effects of drugs, drug combination is one of the effective approaches for treating complex diseases. However, the identification of drug combinations by dose-response methods is still costly. It is promising to develop supervised learning-based approaches to predict potential drug combinations on a large scale. Nevertheless, these approaches have the inadequate utilization of heterogeneous features, which causes the loss of information useful to classification. Moreover, they have an intrinsic bias, because they assume unknown drug pairs as non-combinations, of which some could be real drug combinations in practice. METHODS: To address above issues, this work first designs a two-layer multiple classifier system (TLMCS) to effectively integrate heterogeneous features involving anatomical therapeutic chemical codes of drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug-target interactions, gene ontology of drug targets, and side effects. To avoid the bias caused by labelling unknown samples as negative, it then utilizes the one-class support vector machines, (which requires no negative instance and only labels approved drug combinations as positive instances), as the member classifiers in TLMCS. Last, both a 10-fold cross validation (10-CV) and a novel prediction are performed to validate the performance of TLMCS. RESULTS: The comparison with three state-of-the-art approaches under 10-CV exhibits the superiority of TLMCS, which achieves the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.824 and the area under the precision-recall curve = 0.372. Moreover, the experiment under the novel prediction demonstrates its ability, where 9 out of the top-20 predicted combinative drug pairs are validated by checking the published literature. Furthermore, for each of the newly-validated drug combinations, this work analyses the combining mode of the member drugs and investigates their relationship in terms of drug targeting pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TLMCS provides an effective framework to integrate those heterogeneous features and is trained by only positive samples such that the bias of taking unknown drug pairs as negative samples can be avoided. Furthermore, its results in the novel prediction reveal five types of drug combinations and three types of drug relationships in terms of pathways.

Predicting combinative drug pairs towards realistic screening via integrating heterogeneous features.

BACKGROUND: Drug Combination is one of the effective approaches for treating complex diseases. However, determining combinative drug pairs in clinical trials is still costly. Thus, computational approaches are used to identify potential drug pairs in advance. Existing computational approaches have the following shortcomings: (i) the lack of an effective integration of heterogeneous features leads to a time-consuming training and even results in an over-fitted classifier; and (ii) the narrow consideration of predicting potential drug combinations only among known drugs having known combinations cannot meet the demand of realistic screenings, which pay more attention to potential combinative pairs among newly-coming drugs that have no approved combination with other drugs at all. RESULTS: In this paper, to tackle the above two problems, we propose a novel drug-driven approach for predicting potential combinative pairs on a large scale. We define four new features based on heterogeneous data and design an efficient fusion scheme to integrate these feature. Moreover importantly, we elaborate appropriate cross-validations towards realistic screening scenarios of drug combinations involving both known drugs and new drugs. In addition, we perform an extra investigation to show how each kind of heterogeneous features is related to combinative drug pairs. The investigation inspires the design of our approach. Experiments on real data demonstrate the effectiveness of our fusion scheme for integrating heterogeneous features and its predicting power in three scenarios of realistic screening. In terms of both AUC and AUPR, the prediction among known drugs achieves 0.954 and 0.821, that between known drugs and new drugs achieves 0.909 and 0.635, and that among new drugs achieves 0.809 and 0.592 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach provides not only an effective tool to integrate heterogeneous features but also the first tool to predict potential combinative pairs among new drugs.