Do biologic therapies reduce aortic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis patients?

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the present study, we evaluated the inflammatory activity of the ascending aorta in RA patients who received biological treatment. METHODS: We assessed the aortic wall inflammation of RA patients using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography before and after 6 months of biologic therapies. We also compared the inflammatory activity at the aortic wall in RA patients with remission or low disease activity (RLDA) and those with moderate or high disease activity (MHDA). The aortic uptake was measured by the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the target-to-background ratio (TBR). RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in the analysis (mean age, 58.4 ± 13.8 years old; female, 77%). The Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) had significantly decreased after 6 months: from 5.0 ± 1.2 to 3.3 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). The FDG uptake in the ascending aorta changed from baseline to 6 months, showing a maximum SUV (SUVmax) of 1.83 ± 0.34 to 1.90 ± 0.34 (p = 0.059) and TBR of 1.71 ± 0.23 to 1.75 ± 0.24 (p = 0.222). The SUVmax and TBR after 6 months were significantly higher in the RLDA group than in the MHDA group (2.05 ± 0.32 vs. 1.79 ± 0.33 (p = 0.002) and 1.89 ± 0.33 vs. 1.65 ± 0.20 (p = 0.001), respectively). The percentage of monocytes also significantly increased from baseline to 6 months: from 5.9 ± 1.6 to 6.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The inflammation activity at the ascending aorta in RA patients did not change significantly after 6 months of biological treatment. RA patients with a low disease activity or in clinical remission after 6 months of biological treatment still had an increased inflammatory activity at the aortic wall.

Predictive factors associated with the progression of large-joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after biologic therapy: A post-hoc analysis using FDG-PET/CT and the ARASHI (assessment of rheumatoid arthritis by scoring of large-joint destruction and healing in radiographic imaging) scoring method.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between large-joint damage and findings on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) using the "assessment of rheumatoid arthritis by scoring of large-joint destruction and healing in radiographic imaging (ARASHI)" scoring system. METHODS: A total of 270 large joints (shoulders, elbows, hips, knees, and ankles) in 27 rheumatoid arthritis patients were assessed. FDG-PET/CT was performed at the initiation of biologics. Radiographs at baseline and at 3 years were evaluated using the ARASHI score. RESULTS: Radiographic progression of damage was detected in 35 by Larsen grade vs. 87 by the ARASHI score. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at baseline, Steinbrocker stage at baseline, concomitant prednisolone use, and disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at 6 months were significantly higher in the radiographic progression group. An SUVmax higher than 1.65 at baseline was a significant predictive factor for progressive damage at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The ARASHI score may allow more detailed evaluation of large joints than the Larsen method. Joint destruction is likely to have progressed at 3 years in large joints, which had a higher SUVmax at the initiation of biologics.