Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fertil Steril ; 87(6): 1277-86, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17296195

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the lifetime utilization and perceived benefit of medical treatments and surgical procedures for endometriosis-related symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of self-reported survey data. SETTING: Academic research setting. PATIENT(S): Self-reported surgically diagnosed endometriosis by 1,160 women responding to the 1998 Endometriosis Association survey. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Use, perceived helpfulness, and outcomes of medical treatments and surgical procedures. RESULT(S): Ninety-five percent of respondents reported pelvic pain, had endured symptoms on average of 16 years, and were young (mean: 36 years), white, and educated. Many women (46%) had tried three or more medical treatments, and almost 20% took them for 10+ years. Many reported medical treatments as helpful for symptoms (range, 36.4%-61.9%), but some reported stopping because of ineffectiveness (range, 15.6%-26.1%) or side effects (range, 10.0%-43.5%). Danazol or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was most commonly stopped because of side effects (range, 40.7%-43.5%). Surgical procedures were performed at least three times on 42%. Nearly 20% had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy; these procedures were reported as most successful in improving symptoms (45.9% and 37.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Despite reporting various treatments as helpful, women used many different types and endured symptoms for an average of almost two decades, indicating the profound effect of endometriosis on women's health.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Endometriosis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Endometriosis/fisiopatología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
JAMA ; 288(19): 2432-40, 2002 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12435256

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and antioxidant vitamins are widely used for secondary prevention in postmenopausal women with coronary disease, but no clinical trials have demonstrated benefit to support their use. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether HRT or antioxidant vitamin supplements, alone or in combination, influence the progression of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women, as measured by serial quantitative coronary angiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Women's Angiographic Vitamin and Estrogen (WAVE) Trial, a randomized, double-blind trial of 423 postmenopausal women with at least one 15% to 75% coronary stenosis at baseline coronary angiography. The trial was conducted from July 1997 to January 2002 in 7 clinical centers in the United States and Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive either 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen (plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate for women who had not had a hysterectomy), or matching placebo, and 400 IU of vitamin E twice daily plus 500 mg of vitamin C twice daily, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Annualized mean (SD) change in minimum lumen diameter (MLD) from baseline to concluding angiogram of all qualifying coronary lesions averaged for each patient. Patients with intercurrent death or myocardial infarction (MI) were imputed the worst rank of angiographic outcome. RESULTS: The mean (SD) interval between angiograms was 2.8 (0.9) years. Coronary progression, measured in mean (SD) change, worsened with HRT by 0.047 (0.15) mm/y and by 0.024 (0.15) mm/y with HRT placebo (P =.17); and for antioxidant vitamins by 0.044 (0.15) mm/y and with vitamin placebo by 0.028 (0.15) mm/y (P =.32). When patients with intercurrent death or MI were included, the primary outcome showed an increased risk for women in the active HRT group (P =.045), and suggested an increased risk in the active vitamin group (P =.09). Fourteen patients died in the HRT group and 8 in the HRT placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-4.3), and 16 in the vitamin group and 6 in the vitamin placebo group (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.2). Death, nonfatal MI, or stroke occurred in 26 HRT patients vs 15 HRT controls (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.97-3.6) and in 26 vitamin patients and 18 vitamin controls (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.80-2.9). There was no interaction between the 2 treatment interventions. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with coronary disease, neither HRT nor antioxidant vitamin supplements provide cardiovascular benefit. Instead, a potential for harm was suggested with each treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Vitamina E/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Ácido Ascórbico/sangre , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Estrógenos Conjugados (USP)/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Lipoproteínas/sangre , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Vitamina E/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA