Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 7984, 2023 05 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198280

RESUMEN

The DOHaD theory suggests that adverse environmental factors in early life may lead to the development of metabolic diseases including diabetes and hypertension in adult offspring through epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation. Folic acid (FA) is an important methyl donor in vivo and participates in DNA replication and methylation. The preliminary experimental results of our group demonstrated that lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 50 µg/kg/d) exposure during pregnancy could lead to glucose metabolism disorders in male offspring, but not female offspring; however, the effect of folic acid supplementation on glucose metabolism disorders in male offspring induced by LPS exposure remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, pregnant mice were exposed to LPS on gestational day (GD) 15-17 and were given three doses of FA supplementation (2 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, or 40 mg/kg) from mating to lactation to explore its effect on glucose metabolism in male offspring and the potential mechanism. This study confirmed that FA supplementation of 5 mg/kg in pregnant mice improved glucose metabolism in LPS-exposed offspring during pregnancy by regulating gene expression.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Metabolismo de la Glucosa , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Masculino , Lipopolisacáridos/efectos adversos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Ácido Fólico/efectos adversos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Glucosa/metabolismo
2.
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) ; 69(1): 28-37, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858538

RESUMEN

Periconceptional folate supplementation is prevalent, raising concerns about possible side effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of folic acid supplementation, dietary folate, serum folate with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk. In this matched case-control study, 81 pregnant women with GDM (cases) and 81 pregnant women with non-GDM (controls) were identified through age difference (≤3 y) and parity (Both primipara or multipara women) matching, and serum folate levels were measured during the GDM screening (24-28 gestational wk). Folic acid supplementation and dietary folate intake from three months prepregnancy through midpregnancy were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire and food frequency questionnaire. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between folate and GDM. After adjusting for confounding factors, we observed that compared with folic acid supplementation dose ≤400 µg/d, pregnancies without folic acid supplementation and supplemental dose >800 µg/d were associated with GDM risk (adjusted odds ratio=7.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-39.36; adjusted odds ratio=4.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-17.22), while no significant association with a 400-800 µg/d dose of folic acid supplementation and GDM. Compared with folic acid supplementation dose ≤24 wk, pregnancies without folic acid supplementation were associated with GDM risk (adjusted odds ratio=6.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-36.77), while no significant association with folic acid supplementation dose >24 wk and GDM. No significant association of dietary folate and serum folate with GDM was found. No or a higher dose of folic acid supplementation would increase GDM risk and a dose of <800 µg/d is the safe dose.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ácido Fólico , Modelos Logísticos , Suplementos Dietéticos
3.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 38(7): 583-587, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between dietary n-6: n-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) ratio and the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 pregnant women were prospectively included for detailed information on dietary intake at 16-18 weeks evaluated using a three-day food record, and subsequent GDM diagnosis at 24-28 weeks. Participants were divided into two groups for analysis: GDM group (n = 22) and control group (n = 78) based on oral glucose tolerance test results performed between 24 and 28 weeks. RESULTS: The average dietary n-6: n-3 PUFA ratio in the control group was 5.63 ± 2.12 and that in the GDM group was 8.35 ± 3.45, within a significant difference (p < .05). A significant difference was associated with a higher dietary n-6: n-3 PUFA ratio and GDM (adjusted odds ratio = 4.29, 95%confidence interval:1.303, 14.124). CONCLUSIONS: Higher dietary n-6: n-3 PUFA ratio was associated with higher odds of GDM. Given the small sample, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3 , Dieta , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0267045, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35427393

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the characteristics of gut microbiome and the effect of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) on glycemic control in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Seventy-four pregnant women newly diagnosed with GDM received MNT for one-week. The effect of glycemic control was evaluated by fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose; and stool samples of pregnant women were collected to detect the gut microbiome before and after MNT. We used a nested case-control study design, with pregnant women with GDM who did not meet glycemic standards after MNT as the ineffective group and those with an age difference of ≤5 years, matched for pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) 1:1, and meeting glycemic control criteria as the effective group. Comparison of the gut microbiome characteristics before MNT showed that the ineffective group was enriched in Desulfovibrio, Aeromonadales, Leuconostocaceae, Weissella, Prevotella, Bacillales_Incertae Sedis XI, Gemella and Bacillales, while the effective group was enriched in Roseburia, Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacteriales, Bifidobacteriaceae, Holdemania and Proteus. After treatment, the effective group was enriched in Bifidobacterium and Actinomycete, while the ineffective group was enriched in Holdemania, Proteus, Carnobacteriaceae and Granulicatella. In conclusion, the decrease in the abundance of characteristic gut microbiome positively correlated with blood glucose may be a factor influencing the poor hypoglycemic effect of MNT in pregnant women with GDM. Abundance of more characteristic gut microbiome negatively correlated with blood glucose could help control blood glucose in pregnant women with GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Terapia Nutricional , Glucemia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Femenino , Control Glucémico , Humanos , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA