Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cell Death Dis ; 14(6): 347, 2023 06 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268653

RESUMEN

Studies have indicated dietary restriction of methionine/cystine provided a therapeutic benefit in diseases such as cancer. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie the interaction between methionine/cystine restriction (MCR) and effects on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have remained elusive. Here, we discovered the dietary restriction of methionine/cystine has a large effect on cellular methionine metabolism as assayed in a ECA109 derived xenograft model. RNA-seq and enrichment analysis suggested the blocked tumor progression was affected by ferroptosis, together with the NFκB signaling pathway activation in ESCC. Consistently, GSH content and GPX4 expression were downregulated by MCR both in vivo and in vitro. The contents of Fe2+ and MDA were negatively correlated with supplementary methionine in a dose-dependent way. Mechanistically, MCR and silent of SLC43A2, a methionine transporter, diminished phosphorylation of IKKα/ß and p65. Blocked NFκB signaling pathway further decreased the expression of SLC43A2 and GPX4 in both mRNA and protein level, which in turn downregulated the methionine intake and stimulated ferroptosis, respectively. ESCC progression was inhibited by enhanced ferroptosis and apoptosis and impaired cell proliferation. In this study, we proposed a novel feedback regulation mechanism underlie the correlation between dietary restriction of methionine/cystine and ESCC progression. MCR blocked cancer progression via stimulating ferroptosis through the positive feedback loop between SLC43A2 and NFκB signaling pathways. Our results provided the theoretical basis and new targets for ferroptosis-based clinical antitumor treatments for ESCC patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Ferroptosis , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Cistina/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Metionina/metabolismo , Retroalimentación , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Proliferación Celular , Racemetionina/metabolismo , Racemetionina/farmacología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(19): 4232-4239, 2022 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35929990

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin C plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab versus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, histologically confirmed patients with mCRC (n = 442) with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase status and no prior treatment for metastatic disease were randomized (1:1) into a control (FOLFOX ± bevacizumab) and an experimental [high-dose vitamin C (1.5 g/kg/d, intravenously for 3 hours from D1 to D3) plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab] group. Randomization was based on the primary tumor location and bevacizumab prescription. RESULTS: The progression-free survival (PFS) of the experimental group was not superior to the control group [median PFS, 8.6 vs. 8.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.05; P = 0.1]. The objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of the experimental and control groups were similar (ORR, 44.3% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.9; median OS, 20.7 vs. 19.7 months; P = 0.7). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% and 30.3% of patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively. In prespecified subgroup analyses, patients with RAS mutation had significantly longer PFS (median PFS, 9.2 vs. 7.8 months; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = 0.01) with vitamin C added to chemotherapy than with chemotherapy only. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose vitamin C plus chemotherapy failed to show superior PFS compared with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC as first-line treatment but may be beneficial in patients with mCRC harboring RAS mutation.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ácido Ascórbico/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Fluorouracilo , Glucosafosfato Deshidrogenasa/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA