Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital selenium detector (Thoravision) with that of analog film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography in skeletal radiography for the detection of fissures and lesions in porcine bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred bones taken from domestic pigs (50 ribs and 50 femurs) were divided into two equal groups. Fissures and bone lesions were created in 50 bones and 50 served as controls. The bones were examined using film-screen systems, digital luminescence radiography, and digital selenium radiography at various doses. Digital selenium radiography exposure values were adapted to the image geometry differing from the reference methods with a detector focus distance of 2.15 m. Four radiologists independently evaluated image quality and detectability of fissures and lesions on a five-point scale of confidence. Statistical evaluation was based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Fissures and bone lesions were detected most reliably using the mammography film-screen system, but the difference in the results of the analog and digital reference images did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Compared with analog film-screen systems, the lower spatial resolution of the digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography systems does not affect detectability of fissures and bone lesions in porcine bone. Selenium is effective in skeletal radiography for detecting fissures and bone lesions. With digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography, the surface dose can be cut to half that required for 200-speed film-screen systems without losing any diagnostically relevant information.

[Comparison of digital selenium radiography with an analog screen-film system in the diagnostic process of pneumoconiosis according to ILO classification]. / Vergleich der digitalen Selenradiographie mit einem analogen Film-Folien-System in der Diagnostik von Staublungenerkrankungen anhand der ILO-Klassifikation.

UNLABELLED: Comparison of digital selenium radiography with an analog screen-film system in the diagnostic process of pneumoconiosis according to ILO classification. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic value of digital selenium radiography in patients with pneumoconiosis. For this purpose chest x-rays by digital selenium radiography and analog screen-film system were compared according to the ILO classification of pneumoconiosis. METHOD: After approval of the study by the local ethic commission and the Federal German Office for Radiation Protection 50 patients were subjected to x-rays by digital selenium radiography (Thoravision; Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany) and analog screen-film system of the same day within the scope of an industrial medicine preventive checkup. Four investigators rated the chest x-rays according to the ILO classification of pneumoconiosis. RESULTS: The findings demonstrated by chest x-rays according to ILO classification were rated similar by digital selenium radiography and analog screen film systems. Image quality of the digital pictures was rated significantly better. CONCLUSION: The use of digital selenium radiography in evaluating chest x-rays according to the ILO classification does not result in over- or underestimation of pulmonary pathologies. Hence, in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis, digital selenium radiography can replace the tested analog screen-film system.

[Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details]. / Digitale Selenradiographie: Vergleich der Bildqualität von Thoraxaufnahmen in normalem und verkleinertem Bildformat anhand anatomischer Detailstrukturen.

PURPOSE: Is there a loss of information when using selenium radiographic images displayed with reduced image format compared to full format? METHOD: Digital selenium radiographic chest images in two planes were obtained in 35 patients for medical reasons. The digital data sets of each patient were separately displayed in full format on two different films and were printed in reduced format on one film. The format was reduced to 61% of the full format using an acquisition matrix of 2166 x 2488 pixels, an image display matrix of 4000 x 5000 pixels and a film format of 43 x 49 cm. All images were anonymously evaluated by four independent readers using a questionnaire concerning anatomic structures. RESULTS: Format reduction did not result in a loss of information in diagnostically relevant anatomic details. CONCLUSIONS: Displaying digital selenium radiographic data sets of thoracic view in two planes on one film presumably does not lead to a loss of diagnostic information. This procedure may help to reduce film costs.

[Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?]. / Kann die digitale Selenradiographie in der Thoraxdiagnostik die analoge Röntgenaufnahmetechnik ersetzen?

PURPOSE: To find out the diagnostic value of digital selenium radiography, we compared the image quality of chest x-ray images from 50 patients who had been examined via conventional chest x-ray and digital selenium radiography of the chest. METHOD: 50 patients with a malignant melanoma underwent chest x-ray within 3 months in conventional technique and with digital selenium radiography (Thoravision: Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany). In this period none of the patients showed a difference in respect of clinical status or radiological diagnosis. Simultaneous examinations on the same day were not performed to avoid unnecessary exposure to x-rays. The digital and conventional images were compared by 4 radiologists with regard to image quality by the detection of defined anatomic structures. RESULTS: Image quality of digital selenium radiography was considered superior to that of conventional chest x-rays in the mediastinum, the retrocardiac and retrodiaphragmatic areas, the superior and inferior lobes of the lung especially near the parietal pleura, and the chest wall. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to analogous techniques there is no loss of image information when employing digital selenium radiography in chest x-rays. On the contrary, new assessment criteria may be gained. We conclude that digital selenium radiography offers diagnostic advantages in chest x-ray examination.

[Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. / Diagnostischer Stellenwert der digitalen Projektionsradiographie im Vergleich zur konventionellen Röntgentechnik.

Digital projection radiography provides digital data in x-ray examinations, which used to be carried out by examinations screen-film system combinations. The technological basis and clinical performances of digital luminescent radiography (DLR) and digital radiography are reviewed. Digital projection radiography does not allow to reduce selenium exposure significantly, compared to screen-film system combinations. Digital luminescent radiography can be used for the entire spectrum of analogous projection radiography the only exception being extremely subtile structural changes. The clinical experiences with digital selenium radiography achieved so far in chest x-rays are promising and the technique is expected to be increasing used in other anatomic regions as well.