Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Tradicionales
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Int Med Res ; 46(10): 4032-4038, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30088790

RESUMEN

It is generally accepted that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the etiological agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. According to this claim, HIV was transferred to humans from contact with monkeys around 35-50 years ago. However, this claim has not been sufficiently confirmed epidemiologically. The spread and incubation period of the plague epidemic has led to the theory that the Black Death was caused by hemorrhagic viruses. Having examined detailed historical data, we have concluded that the bacterium Yersenia pestis was an infectious agent in the epidemic, together with another agent which we suggest was HIV. Our considerations were mainly based on the existence of the CCR5 delta 32 mutation, which protects against HIV infection and has been present in the Caucasian population for over 2000 years. The combination of two infectious agents led to the devastation of the Black Death, the removal of HIV carriers, and an increase in the number of CCR5Δ32 mutations in the Caucasian population. In sub-Saharan Africa, this epidemic and subsequent sanitation process did not occur, which explains the much higher level of HIV genetic information in this part of the world.


Asunto(s)
Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH , Receptores CCR5/genética , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/epidemiología , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/genética , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/historia , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Asia/epidemiología , Evolución Biológica , Población Negra/genética , Epidemias/historia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Evolución Molecular , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/genética , Infecciones por VIH/historia , Fiebres Hemorrágicas Virales/epidemiología , Fiebres Hemorrágicas Virales/genética , Fiebres Hemorrágicas Virales/historia , Heterocigoto , Historia del Siglo XV , Historia del Siglo XVI , Historia del Siglo XVII , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Historia Antigua , Historia Medieval , Humanos , Peste/epidemiología , Peste/genética , Peste/historia , Viruela/epidemiología , Viruela/genética , Viruela/historia , Población Blanca/genética
2.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 16(2): 188-195, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27151581

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Availability without prescription restriction, low cost, and simple oral administration allow cancer patients to use probiotics without knowledge of potential risks. We present a survey of probiotic use and the association with patient tumor characteristics in cancer patients treated at the outpatient department of the National Cancer Institute in Slovakia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March and December 2014, 499 patients were asked to evaluate their overall experience with probiotics by questionnaire form, including the length and method of use relative to anticancer therapy, expectations, side-effect experiences, understanding of the possible risks, dietary supplement use, and others. The relevant data were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 323 women (64.7%) and 176 men (35.3%); 91.6% were undergoing chemotherapy (2.6% together with radiotherapy) and 8.4% had no anticancer therapy. The prevalence of probiotic use was 28.5% and only 12 patients using probiotics (8.5%) described negative side effects. Most patients declared consideration of probiotic use based on recommendation from a physician (37.3%) or a pharmacist (14.8%). Nevertheless, up to 86.6% of patients declared no knowledge of possible risks. Statistically significant correlation was found between probiotic use and age of patients (P < .008), gender (P < .023), and taking other dietary supplements (P < .000002). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, we present for the first time the prevalence, side-effect experience, and aspects that most likely influence probiotic use in cancer patients. Minimal knowledge of risks underlines the importance of an active approach by oncologists to inform patients about probiotic safety.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Probióticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Eslovaquia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Complement Ther Med ; 23(3): 356-62, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26051570

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Diarrhea is one of the dose limiting toxicity of irinotecan. SN-38 is main irinotecan metabolite responsible for diarrhea development, which is excreted in glucuronidated form into the intestine. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the probiotics in the prevention of irinotecan induced diarrhea due to reduction of intestinal beta-d-glucuronidase activity. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2013, 46 patients with colorectal cancer starting a new line of irinotecan based therapy were included. Patients were randomized 1:1 to probiotics (PRO) or placebo (PLA). Probiotic formula Colon Dophilus™, was administered at a dose of 10×10(9)CFU of bacteria tid, orally for 12 weeks of chemotherapy. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual, when 46 of 220 planned patients were accrued. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were randomized to PRO and 23 patients to PLA. Administration of probiotics compared to placebo led to a reduction in the incidence of severe diarrhea of grade 3 or 4 (0% for PRO vs. 17.4% for PLA, p=0.11), as well as reduction of the overall incidence of diarrhea (39.1% for PRO vs. 60.9% for PLA, p=0.24) and incidence of enterocolitis (0% for PRO vs. 8.7% for PLA). Patients on PRO used less antidiarrheal drugs compared to PLA. There was no infection caused by probiotic strains recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of probiotics in patients with colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy is safe and could lead to a reduction in the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/prevención & control , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto
4.
Complement Ther Med ; 21(6): 712-23, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24280481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are live microorganisms, which as drugs or food supplements help to maintain health beneficial microbial balance in the digestive tract of a human or other host. Probiotics by their properties may help strengthen homeostasis and thus reduce side effects associated with cancer treatment. Experimental evidence suggests that probiotics might have beneficial effect on the toxicity of anticancer therapy. METHODS: A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed (keywords: "probiotic" and "lactic acid bacteria" in association with the search terms "cancer" or "oncology" or "chemotherapy" or "radiation"); data reported at international meetings were included. RESULTS: Probiotics might have beneficial effects on some aspects of toxicity related to anticancer treatment especially radiation therapy. However, reported trials vary in utilized probiotic strains, dose of probiotics and vast majority of them are small trials with substantial risk of bias. Despite limited data, it seems that probiotic bacteria as live microorganisms could be safely administered even in the setting of neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supporting probiotic use as adjunctive therapy to anticancer treatment is limited, especially in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Well designed clinical trials are needed to find true role of probiotics in oncology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Quimioradioterapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA