Effect of an Herbal-Based Injection on 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: The EXIT-SEP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Previous research has suggested that Xuebijing injection (XBJ), an herbal-based intravenous preparation, may reduce mortality among patients with sepsis. Objective: To determine the effect of XBJ vs placebo on 28-day mortality among patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Efficacy of Xuebijing Injection in Patients With Sepsis (EXIT-SEP) trial was a multicenter, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in intensive care units at 45 sites and included 1817 randomized patients with sepsis (sepsis 3.0) present for less than 48 hours. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2 to 13 were enrolled. The study was conducted from October 2017 to June 2019. The final date of follow-up was July 26, 2019. Data analysis was performed from January 2020 to August 2022. Interventions: The patients were randomized to receive either intravenous infusion of XBJ (100 mL, n = 911) or volume-matched saline placebo (n = 906) every 12 hours for 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: Among the 1817 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [13.5] years; 1199 [66.0%] men), 1760 (96.9%) completed the trial. In these patients, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly different between the placebo group and the XBJ group (230 of 882 patients [26.1%] vs 165 of 878 patients [18.8%], respectively; P < .001). The absolute risk difference was 7.3 (95% CI, 3.4-11.2) percentage points. The incidence of adverse events was 222 of 878 patients (25.3%) in the placebo group and 200 of 872 patients (22.9%) in the XBJ group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with sepsis, the administration of XBJ reduced 28-day mortality compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03238742.

[Xuebijing injection improve pulmonary vascular barrier function in ARDS by up-regulating claudin-5 expression through PI3K/Akt/FOXO1 signaling pathway].

OBJECTIVE: To study the signaling pathway of the up-regulation of claudin-5 expression by Xuebijing injection. METHODS: Animal and cell models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). (1) In vivo study, 20 male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: control group, LPS group (LPS injection 10 mg/kg for 12 hours), Xuebijing control group (Xuebijing injection 1 mg/kg, twice a day, for 3 days), and Xuebijing intervention group (LPS injection after pretreatment of Xuebijing injection), according to random number method with 5 rats in each group. The lung tissues were taken to detect lung dry/wet weight ratio (W/D) and the morphological changes in each group. Claudin-5, phosphorylated forkhead box transcription factor O1 (p-FOXO1), total FOXO1 (t-FOXO1), phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) and total Akt (t-Akt) in lung tissues were detected by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and Western blotting. (2) In vitro study, human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) were divided into 6 groups (5 holes in each group): control group, Xubijing control group (incubated with 2 g/L Xubijing for 24 hours), phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) signaling pathway LY294002 control group (incubated with 10 µmol/L LY294002 for 1 hour), LPS group (incubated with 1 mg/L LPS for 12 hours), Xubijing intervention group (incubated with 2 g/L Xuebijing for 24 hours, then with 1 mg/L LPS for 12 hours) and LY294002 intervention group (incubated with 10 µmol/L LY294002 for 1 hour, then with 2 g/L and Xubijing for 24 hours, and then with 1 mg/L LPS for 12 hours). The expression levels of claudin-5, p-FOXO1, t-FOXO1, p-Akt and t-Akt of HPMECs in each group were assessed by Western blotting. RESULTS: In vivo study: (1) Compared with the control group, the lung W/D ratio increased significantly in LPS group (6.79±0.42 vs. 4.19±0.13), and decreased significantly after the intervention of Xuebijing (4.92±0.38 vs. 6.79±0.42, P < 0.01). (2) Morphological changes of lung tissue: compared with the control group, the injury of lung tissue in LPS group was more serious, which was significantly improved after Xuebijing intervention. (3) Expression levels of claudin-5, p-Akt/t-Akt and p-FOXO1/t-FOXO1: the expression levels of claudin-5, p-Akt/t-Akt and p-FOXO1/t-FOXO1 in LPS group were significantly decreased as compared with the control group (claudin-5/GAPDH: 0.33±0.03 vs. 1.03±0.07, p-Akt/t-Akt: 0.18±0.02 vs. 1.01±0.13, p-FOXO1/t-FOXO1: 0.16±0.06 vs. 1.00±0.19, all P < 0.01). After the intervention of Xuebijing, the expression levels were significantly increased as compared with the LPS group (claudin-5/GAPDH: 0.53±0.05 vs. 0.33±0.03, p-Akt/t-Akt: 0.56±0.12 vs. 0.18±0.02, p-FOXO1/t-FOXO1: 0.68±0.10 vs. 0.16±0.06, all P < 0.01). In vitro study: compared with the control group, the expression level of claudin-5 in the LPS group was significantly decreased (claudin-5/ß-actin: 0.45±0.03 vs. 1.01±0.15, P < 0.01), and the expression level of claudin-5 in Xuebijing intervention group was also significantly decreased (claudin-5/ß-actin: 0.80±0.08 vs. 1.01±0.15, P < 0.01). After the intervention of LY294002, the expression of claudin-5 was significantly decreased as compared with the Xubijing intervention group (claudin-5/ß-actin: 0.41±0.02 vs. 0.80±0.08, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Xuebijing injection improve pulmonary vascular barrier function in rats with ARDS by up-regulating claudin-5 expression through PI3K/Akt/FOXO1 signaling pathway.

A meta-analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients with traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic hypothermia management remains controversial in patients with traumatic brain injury. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the risks and benefits of therapeutic hypothermia management in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (Central) and Clinical Trials databases from inception to January 17, 2019. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that investigated therapeutic hypothermia management versus normothermia management in patients with traumatic brain injury. We collected the individual data of the patients from each included study. Meta-analyses were performed for 6-month mortality, unfavourable functional outcome and pneumonia morbidity. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials involving a total of 2796 patients were included. The randomised controlled trials with a high quality show significantly more mortality in the therapeutic hypothermia group [risk ratio (RR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.53, p = 0.02]. Lower mortality in the therapeutic hypothermia group occurred when therapeutic hypothermia was received within 24 h (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96, p = 0.01), when hypothermia was received for treatment (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.88, p = 0.006) or when hypothermia was combined with post-craniectomy measures (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.00, p = 0.05). The risk of unfavourable functional outcome following therapeutic hypothermia management appeared to be significantly reduced (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91, p = 0.001). The meta-analysis suggested that there was a significant increase in the risk of pneumonia with therapeutic hypothermia management (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.97, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce but might increase the mortality rate of patients with traumatic brain injury in some high-quality studies. However, traumatic brain injury patients with elevated intracranial hypertension could benefit from hypothermia in therapeutic management instead of prophylaxis when initiated within 24 h.

[Effect of Xuebijing injection treatment on acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter prospective randomized control clinical trial].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic effect of Xuebijing injection on adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized control study was conducted at 10 intensive care units in Jiangsu province. A total of 172 early ARDS patients were randomly divided into Xuebijing treatment and control groups. All patients received routine therapy of ARDS while additional Xuebijing injection 100 ml was administered in the treatment group intravenously for 7 days. Lung injury score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) and PaO2/FiO2 of the patients was recorded before and after treatment. Mortality at 28 days and the duration of mechanical ventilation were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were assigned to receive Xuebijing injection and 81 patients as control; Mortality at Days 28 and 90, the duration of mechanical ventilation and ventilation free days showed no difference between two groups (P > 0.05). PaO2/FiO2 improved after randomization versus pre-treatment in all patients. There was no significant difference between two groups. Murray scores were not significantly different between two groups. In a subgroup analysis of patients with pulmonary infection, pulmonary contusion and extra-pulmonary cause, two groups had no difference in mortality at Day 28, mortality at Day 90, the duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilation free days and days of ICU stay (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The treatment of Xuebijing injection early in course of ARDS does not improve the mortality of ARDS patients. But it may improve lung function and oxygenation. Further studies are warranted.

[A prospective randomized control clinical study of the effect of Xuebijing injection on prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of Xuebijing injection on prognosis, immune function, adrenal function and inflammatory reaction during the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: From January 2008 through December 2008, a clinical study was conducted on consecutive adult patients with ARDS in intensive care unit (ICU). The patients were divided into Xuebijing group (31 patients) and control group (30 patients). Both groups were treated with the routine therapy of ARDS, and in addition, Xuebijing injection was used in a dose of 100 ml twice a day for 7 days in Xuebijing group. Duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and ICU length of stay, 28-day mortality, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), Murray and Marshall scores were recorded in both groups. Every patient was given one injection of corticotrophin 250 microg intravenously before and after treatment, and plasma cortisol level was detected by radio-immunoassay before the injection (T0) and 30 minutes (T30) and 60 minutes (T60) after the injection. The ratio of adrenal insufficiency was evaluated according to diagnostic criteria of relative adrenal insufficiency, which was defined as the difference between T0 and the highest value of T30 or T60 (Delta Tmax)< or =248.4 nmol/L. Human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR), subpopulations of T lymphocyte (CD4(+)/CD8(+)), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10 in peripheral blood was also determined. RESULTS: Murray (1.5+/-1.5) and Marshall score (2.9+/-2.7) and the level of IL-6 [(3.4+/-1.9) micromol/L], IL-10 [(1.5+/-0.8) micromol/L] in the Xuebijing group were decreased significantly after the use of Xuebijing compared with control group [4.3+/-3.1, 6.3+/-4.1, (8.9+/-10.2) micromol/L, (4.2+/-4.8) micromol/L, respectively, all P<0.01], while the values of HLA-DR (41.1+/-10.1), CD4(+) (58.0+/-10.7), CD4(+)/CD8(+) (1.9+/-0.3) were increased compared with control group [30.6+/-15.0, 50.5+/-16.2, 1.4+/-0.7, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01]. The ratio of adrenal insufficiency in Xuebijing group (45.2%) was lower than that of control group (83.3%), while that of Delta Tmax [(328.4+/-278.3) micromol/L] was higher than that of control group [(172.8+/-110.8) micromol/L, both P<0.01]. MV duration [(4.0+/-3.3) days] and ICU length of stay [(8.4+/-4.2) days] were less than those of control group [(5.9+/-3.8) days, (12.0+/-7.6) days, both P<0.05], and 28-day mortality in Xuebijing group was 35.5%, which was 11.2% less than that of control group (46.7%), but there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Xuebijing injection improves organ function, decreases MV duration and ICU length of stay in ARDS patients. The underlying mechanism may involve modulation of the immune function, decrease in the degree of adrenal insufficiency, and modulation of regulating inflammatory reaction.