RESUMEN
Unilateral adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA), but it lacks an option for patients with APA who refuse or are not suitable for surgery. In this study, we studied whether catheter-based adrenal ablation for APA is comparable to adrenalectomy. A total of 2185 hypertensive patients were screened, and 112 patients with APA were recruited and counselled on the treatment options. Fifty-two patients opted for catheter-based adrenal ablation, and 60 opted for adrenalectomy. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were assessed at 6 months after treatment. Factors associated with hypertension remission and the advantages and limitations of this approach were evaluated. According to the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome (PASO) criteria, complete and partial clinical success was achieved in 21 (40.4%) and 23 (44.2%) patients in the ablation group vs. 33 (55.0%) and 23 (38.3%) patients in the adrenalectomy group, respectively. Complete and partial biochemical success was achieved in 30 (57.7%) and 17 (32.7%) patients in the ablation group vs. 51 (85.0%) and 5 (8.3%) patients in the adrenalectomy group, respectively. The complete clinical success rate was not (P > 0.05), but the complete biochemical success rate was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.01). Factors associated with adrenal ablation-mediated hypertension remission were hypertension duration and serum potassium level at baseline. Compared with surgery, adrenal ablation requires a shorter operating time and time to resume physical activity. Catheter-based adrenal ablation may be an alternative and feasible option for APA patients unwilling to receive surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Hiperaldosteronismo , Hipertensión , Humanos , Aldosterona , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adrenalectomía , Hipertensión/cirugía , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Adenoma/complicaciones , CatéteresRESUMEN
High salt intake is a major risk factor for hypertension and is associated with cardiovascular events. Most countries exhibit a traditionally high salt intake; thus, identification of an optimal strategy for salt reduction at the population level may have a major impact on public health. In this multicenter, random-order, double-blind observational and interventional study, subjects with a high spice preference had a lower salt intake and blood pressure than subjects who disliked spicy food. The enjoyment of spicy flavor enhanced salt sensitivity and reduced salt preference. Salt intake and salt preference were related to the regional metabolic activity in the insula and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) of participants. Administration of capsaicin-the major spicy component of chili pepper-enhanced the insula and OFC metabolic activity in response to high-salt stimuli, which reversed the salt intensity-dependent differences in the metabolism of the insula and OFC. In animal study, OFC activity was closely associated with salt preference, and salty-taste information processed in the OFC was affected in the presence of capsaicin. Thus, interventions related to this region may alter the salt preference in mice through fiber fluorometry and optogenetic techniques. In conclusion, enjoyment of spicy foods may significantly reduce individual salt preference, daily salt intake, and blood pressure by modifying the neural processing of salty taste in the brain. Application of spicy flavor may be a promising behavioral intervention for reducing high salt intake and blood pressure.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Capsaicina/administración & dosificación , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Fitoterapia/métodos , Cloruro de Sodio Dietético/administración & dosificación , Especias , Percepción del Gusto/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , RatonesRESUMEN
Taurine, the most abundant, semiessential, sulfur-containing amino acid, is well known to lower blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive animal models. However, no rigorous clinical trial has validated whether this beneficial effect of taurine occurs in human hypertension or prehypertension, a key stage in the development of hypertension. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we assessed the effects of taurine intervention on BP and vascular function in prehypertension. We randomly assigned 120 eligible prehypertensive individuals to receive either taurine supplementation (1.6 g per day) or a placebo for 12 weeks. Taurine supplementation significantly decreased the clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BPs, especially in those with high-normal BP. Mean clinic systolic BP reduction for taurine/placebo was 7.2/2.6 mm Hg, and diastolic BP was 4.7/1.3 mm Hg. Mean ambulatory systolic BP reduction for taurine/placebo was 3.8/0.3 mm Hg, and diastolic BP was 3.5/0.6 mm Hg. In addition, taurine supplementation significantly improved endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation and increased plasma H2S and taurine concentrations. Furthermore, changes in BP were negatively correlated with both the plasma H2S and taurine levels in taurine-treated prehypertensive individuals. To further elucidate the hypotensive mechanism, experimental studies were performed both in vivo and in vitro. The results showed that taurine treatment upregulated the expression of hydrogen sulfide-synthesizing enzymes and reduced agonist-induced vascular reactivity through the inhibition of transient receptor potential channel subtype 3-mediated calcium influx in human and mouse mesenteric arteries. In conclusion, the antihypertensive effect of chronic taurine supplementation shows promise in the treatment of prehypertension through improvement of vascular function.