Brucea javanica oil emulsion suppresses tumor growth in human cervical cancer cells through inhibition of the E6 oncogene and induction of apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: Brucea javanica oil emulsion (BJOE) is a traditional Chinese medicine with recognized antitumor effects in various cancers, but the effects and mechanisms of action of BJOE against cervical cancer need to be further studied. Herein, we investigated the effects of BJOE on the human papillomavirus (HPV)16-expressing human cervical cancer line SiHa and explored the possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Cell viability and apoptosis of SiHa cells treated with BJOE were assessed by the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] and annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (annexin V-FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) staining assays, respectively. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses were performed to assess the expression levels of the E6 oncogene and key signaling molecules involved in apoptosis. A subcutaneous xenograft nude mouse model bearing SiHa cells was established and treated with BJOE through intraperitoneal injection. Tumor growth was monitored, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed. RESULTS: BJOE exhibited substantial cytotoxic effects in SiHa cells and significantly suppressed tumor growth in SiHa cell xenografts. BJOE inhibited E6 expression and induced apoptosis in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. BJOE-induced apoptosis was characterized by activation of caspase-3 and cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Moreover, BJOE induced phosphorylation of extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) and inhibited the expression of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). CONCLUSIONS: BJOE exerts a strong tumor-suppressive effect in SiHa cells in vitro and in vivo, likely caused by E6 inhibition and apoptosis induction achieved through the ERK/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and NF-κB signaling pathways, supporting potential use of BJOE in cervical cancer treatment.

Serum folate concentrations at diagnosis are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma survival in the Guangdong Liver Cancer Cohort study.

Existing data on folate status and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis are scarce. We prospectively examined whether serum folate concentrations at diagnosis were associated with liver cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) among 982 patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated HCC, who were enrolled in the Guangdong Liver Cancer Cohort (GLCC) study between September 2013 and February 2017. Serum folate concentrations were measured using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI by sex-specific quartile of serum folate. Compared with patients in the third quartile of serum folate, patients in the lowest quartile had significantly inferior LCSS (HR = 1·48; 95 % CI 1·05, 2·09) and OS (HR = 1·43; 95 % CI 1·03, 1·99) after adjustment for non-clinical and clinical prognostic factors. The associations were not significantly modified by sex, age at diagnosis, alcohol drinking status and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage. However, there were statistically significant interactions on both multiplicative and additive scale between serum folate and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels or smoking status and the associations of lower serum folate with worse LCSS and OS were only evident among patients with CRP > 3·0 mg/l or current smokers. An inverse association with LCSS were also observed among patients with liver damage score ≥3. These results suggest that lower serum folate concentrations at diagnosis are independently associated with worse HCC survival, most prominently among patients with systemic inflammation and current smokers. A future trial of folate supplementation seems to be promising in HCC patients with lower folate status.

Vessels That Encapsulate Tumor Clusters (VETC) Pattern Is a Predictor of Sorafenib Benefit in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Sorafenib is the most recommended first-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet there is no clinically applied biomarker for predicting sorafenib response. We have demonstrated that a vascular pattern, named VETC (Vessels that Encapsulate Tumor Clusters), facilitates the release of whole tumor clusters into the bloodstream; VETC-mediated metastasis relies on vascular pattern, but not on migration and invasion of cancer cells. In this study, we aimed to explore whether vascular pattern could predict sorafenib benefit. Two cohorts of patients were recruited from four academic hospitals. The survival benefit of sorafenib treatment for patients with or without the VETC pattern (VETC+ /VETC- ) was investigated. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that sorafenib treatment significantly reduced death risk and prolonged overall survival (OS; in cohort 1/2, P = 0.004/0.005; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.567/0.408) and postrecurrence survival (PRS; in cohort 1/2, P = 0.001/0.002; HR = 0.506/0.384) in VETC+ patients. However, sorafenib therapy was not beneficial for VETC- patients (OS in cohort 1/2, P = 0.204/0.549; HR = 0.761/1.221; PRS in cohort 1/2, P = 0.121/0.644; HR = 0.728/1.161). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that sorafenib treatment significantly improved OS/PRS in VETC+ , but not VETC- , patients. Further mechanistic investigations showed that VETC+ and VETC- HCCs displayed similar levels of light chain 3 (LC3) and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in tumor tissues (pERK) or endothelial cells (EC-pERK), and greater sorafenib benefit was consistently observed in VETC+ HCC patients than VETC- irrespective of levels of pERK/EC-pERK/LC3, suggesting that the different sorafenib benefit between VETC+ and VETC- HCCs may not result from activation of Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/ERK and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)A/VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2)/ERK signaling or induction of autophagy. Conclusion: Sorafenib is effective in prolonging the survival of VETC+ , but not VETC- , patients. VETC pattern may act as a predictor of sorafenib benefit for HCC.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combined with Concurrent Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is recommended for the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with HCC and major portal vein tumor thrombosis treated with sorafenib monotherapy is no more than 3 months. A prospective single-arm phase II study was conducted to determine whether adding hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin to sorafenib could improve on these results. METHODS: Thirty five patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 HAI on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 HAI on days 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, repeated every 21 days. The primary end point was the 3-month PFS rate. RESULTS: The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 82.9, 51.4, and 22.9%, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival was 6.7 and 13.2 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 40%, and the disease control rate was 77.1% by RECIST criteria. Five (14.3%) patients achieved conversion to complete resection after the study treatment, and one of them experienced a pathological complete response. Treatment-related deaths did not occur. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of increases in aspartate aminotransferase (31.4%), hand-foot syndrome (17.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.3%), and neutropenia (8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment met the pre-specified end point of a 3-month progression free survival rate exceeding 65% and was clinical tolerable. The merits of this approach need to be established with a phase III trial. Clinical trial number http://ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02981498).

[Prognostic analysis of 443 cases of stage II colorectal cancer and the value of adjuvant chemotherapy].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer varies. Whether or not to perform adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with stage II colorectal cancer is controversial. This study was to explore the prognostic factors for the patients with stage II colorectal cancer and evaluate the effect and the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Between January 2000 and January 2005, 443 patients with stage II colorectal cancer receiving radical surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival rate and survival curve were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses were performed by the Cox regression model. Patients with or without chemotherapy (Xelox/Folfox regimen) with high-risk factors were analyzed respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 59 months, and the 3-and 5-year survival rates were 88.4% and 82.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that intestinal obstruction or perforation, diabetes mellitus, inadequate surgical margin, and the number of sampled nodes < 9 were poor prognostic factors. Patients with intestinal obstruction or perforation, the number of sampled nodes < 9 achieved higher 5-year survival (80% and 86%) undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy than those receiving surgery alone (67% and 64%). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with intestinal obstruction or perforation, diabetes mellitus, inadequate surgical margin, and the number of sampled nodes < 9 are relatively poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to patients with intestinal obstruction, perforation or sampled nodes < 9.