[Evaluation methods of clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine].

Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often restrict the generation of high-level evidence. Therefore, methodological research should be deepened and innovative practice should be carried out to study the application of scientific research methods in the evaluation of the advantages of TCM. After more than ten years of development, the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, on the basis of the initially classic placebo randomized controlled trials, has successively carried out a series of meaningful attempts and explorations in N-of-1 trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, real world studies, narrative medicine studies, systematic evaluation, and other aspects, laying the foundation for the transformation of TCM from "experience" to "evidence". This paper focused on the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, summarized the main connotation and development status of efficacy evaluation indicators, standards, and methods, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the problems of indicator selection, standard formulation, and methodology optimization in the research process. It is clear that scientific and objective evaluation of the efficacy of TCM is an urgent problem to be solved at present.

[Problems and thoughts in clinical safety evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine].

Amid the modernization and internationalization of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the safety of TCM has attracted much attention. At the moment, the government, scientific research teams, and pharmaceutical enterprises have made great efforts to explore methods and techniques for clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Although considerable achievements have been made, there are still many problems, such as the non-standard terms of adverse reactions of TCM, unclear evaluation indicators, unreasonable judgment methods, lack of evaluation models, out-of-date evaluation standards, and unsound reporting systems. Therefore, it is urgent to further deepen the research mode and method of clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Based on the current national requirements for the life-cycle management of drugs, this study focused on the problems in the five dimensions of clinical safety evaluation of TCM, including normative terms, evaluation modes, judgment methods, evaluation standards, and reporting systems, and proposed suggestions on the development of a life-cycle clinical safety evaluation method that conformed to the characteristics of TCM, hoping to provide a reference for future research.

Efficacy and safety of zhibitai in the treatment of hyperlipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zhibitai (ZBT) in the treatment of patients with hyperlipidemia (HLP). Methods: A search of 8 electronic databases was conducted to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZBT for the treatment of HLP. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials 2.0 (RoB 2.0). The primary outcomes were the levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The total effective rate served as the secondary outcome. The incidence of adverse events was considered the safety outcome. Review Manager 5.4 was used to conduct meta-analyses. Data were pooled by random-effects or fixed-effects model to obtain the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: There were 28 eligible RCTs with a total of 2,952 participants. Overall, we verified that ZBT plus conventional therapy (CT) was superior to CT for the treatment of HLP [TC: MD = -0.50, 95% CI (-0.80, -0.19); TG: MD = -0.38, 95% CI (-0.49, -0.27); LDL-C: MD = -0.50, 95% CI (-0.69, -0.31); HDL-C: MD = 0.17, 95% CI (0.11, 0.24); total effective rate: OR = 4.26, 95% CI (2.28, 7.95)]. There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes between ZBT alone vs. CT (p > 0.05). For safety, the ZBT group (with CT or alone) outperformed the CT group [ZBT alone: RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.32, 0.81); ZBT plus CT: RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.30, 0.89)]. For each outcome, the subgroups and the sensitivity analysis matched the overall results. Conclusion: ZBT may be safe and beneficial to HLP patients, especially for serum lipid management. ZBT can be used along with CT for the treatment of HLP. However, it is necessary to conduct more rigorous RCTs to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022316251].

[Clinical observation of chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis].

OBJECTIVE: To observe clinical efficacy of chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis (DS). METHODS: From June 2017 to September 2019, 120 patients with degenerative scoliosis were randomly divided into treatment group (60 cases) and control group(60 cases). The patients in treatment group were treated with chiropractic manipulation once every other day for 4 weeks. The patients in control group were treated with eperisone hydrochloride tablets combined with thoracolumbar orthopedic(TSLO)brace, oral eperisone hydrochloride tablets 50 mg three times a day, wearing TSLO brace for not less than 8 hours a day. The course of treatment was 4 weeks. After the patients were selected into the group, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded before treatment, 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks after treatment and 1 month after treatment. The full length X-ray of the spine was taken before and 4 weeks after treatment, and the scoliosis Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured and compared. The adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. RESULTS: There were significant differences in VAS and ODI between two groups at each time point after treatment (P<0.001), VAS and ODI at 2 weeks after treatment (PVAS=0.025, PODI=0.032) and 3 weeks after treatment(PVAS=0.040, PODI=0.044) in treatment group were significantly different from those in control group, but there was no significant difference in VAS and ODI at other time points between treatment group and control group (P>0.05). There was significant difference in Cobb angle between treatment group(P=0.010) and control group(P=0.017) after treatment, but there was no significant difference in LL and SVA between treatment group and control group. There was no significant difference in Cobb angle, LL and SVA between two groups before and after treatment. During the treatment, there were 4 mild adverse reactions in the control group and no adverse reactions in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic manipulation can effectively relieve pain and improve lumbar function in patients with degenerative scoliosis. The onset of action is faster than that oral eperisone hydrochloride tablets combined with TSLO brace, and it has better safety and can improve Cobb angle of patients with degenerative scoliosis.

Method Development and Validation of Seven Pyrethroid Insecticides in Tea and Vegetable by Modified QuEChERS and HPLC-MS/MS.

This study developed a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) procedure for determining seven pyrethroid pesticide residues in tea, cucumber, and tomato via high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The overall average recoveries of the seven pyrethroids were 72%-104% (relative standard deviation (RSD); 2.0%-16.1%, 89%-109% (RSD; 0.7%-17.3%), 82%-110% (RSD; 1.6%-17.1%) for tea, cucumber and tomato, respectively. The determination coefficient (R2), the limit of detection (LOD), and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were ≥ 0.99, 0.007-1.875 µg kg-1, and 0.025-6.250 µg kg-1, respectively. The method was successfully used to monitor the pyrethroid pesticide residues in market samples. HPLC-MS/MS rapidly, sensitively, and accurately determined the pyrethroid pesticide residues.