Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Disabil Rehabil ; 44(8): 1305-1312, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779544

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate acute and subacute hemodynamic responses and perception of effort in individuals with CCC submitted to different IMT protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized cross-over trial conducted on CCC subjects with systolic left ventricular dysfunction (<45% left ventricular ejection fraction) without or with heart failure (stages B2 and C, respectively). Twenty-one participants performed two IMT protocols, one targeting 60% maximal inspiratory pressure with 3 × 10 repetitions (MIP60) and the other targeting 30% maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP30) with 3 × 20 repetitions with a 2 min recovery between sets for both. MIP60 and MIP30 were performed on the same day with a 2 h washout period. Measurements were taken at baseline, during and 60 min after IMT. RESULTS: No differences in hemodynamic variables were observed across protocols. The perception of effort increased in both protocols, with higher scores for the MIP30 protocol (ß = +1.6, p = 0.01; ß = +1.1, p = 0.02; ß = +0.9, p = 0.08 for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd sets, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in hemodynamic responses comparing MIP60 and MIP30 protocols in subjects with CCC. Despite the higher perception of effort during endurance protocol, both protocols can be considered a safe therapeutic strategy.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONDespite inspiratory muscle training may result in functional capacity improvements, no previous study evaluated the hemodynamic acute and subacute responses to inspiratory muscle training in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.The two inspiratory muscle training protocols (30% and 60% of maximal inspiratory pressure) did not cause significant hemodynamic repercussions in subjects with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.Inspiratory muscle training seems to be an effective strategy to improve functional capacity and can be implemented in the rehabilitation programs for patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy.Since no significant adverse responses were observed in any of the hemodynamic parameters during the inspiratory muscle training sessions, these two protocols of inspiratory muscle training (30% and 60% of maximal inspiratory pressure) seems to be safe in subjects with Chagas cardiomyopathy.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Chagásica , Músculos Respiratorios , Ejercicios Respiratorios/métodos , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/terapia , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Percepción , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda
2.
Trials ; 19(1): 507, 2018 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30231899

RESUMEN

Several studies evaluating clinical forms of chronic Chagas disease show that about one-third of patients present cardiac involvement. Heart failure, sudden death and cardioembolic stroke are the main mechanisms of death in Chagas heart disease. The impact of specific etiologic treatment on the prognosis of patients with chronic Chagas heart disease is very limited regardless of the presence or absence of heart failure. Patients with symptomatic Chagas heart disease present serum selenium (Se) levels lower than patients without Chagas heart disease. Moreover, Se supplementation in animal models showed promising results. The aim of this trial is to estimate the effect of Se treatment on prevention of heart disease progression in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. However, we had to introduce some protocol modifications in order to keep trial feasibility, as follows: the primary outcome was restricted to left ventricular ejection fraction as a continuous variable, excluding disease progression; the follow-up period was decreased from 5 years to 1 year, an adjustment that might increase the participation rate of our study; the superior age limit was increased from 65 to 75 years; and diabetes mellitus was no longer considered an exclusion criterion. All of these protocol modifications were extensively debated by the research team enrolled in the design, recruitment and conduction of the clinical trial to guarantee a high scientific quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00875173 . Registered on 20 October 2008.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Selenito de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/parasitología , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Selenito de Sodio/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA