Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Science ; 372(6546): 1041-1042, 2021 06 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083476
2.
EBioMedicine ; 55: 102768, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32344202

RESUMEN

The pandemic spread of a novel coronavirus - SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) as a cause of acute respiratory illness, named Covid-19, is placing the healthcare systems of many countries under unprecedented stress. Global economies are also spiraling towards a recession in fear of this new life-threatening disease. Vaccines that prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and therapeutics that reduces the risk of severe Covid-19 are thus urgently needed. A rapid method to derive antiviral treatment for Covid-19 is the use of convalescent plasma derived hyperimmune globulin. However, both hyperimmune globulin and vaccine development face a common hurdle - the risk of antibody-mediated disease enhancement. The goal of this review is to examine the body of evidence supporting the hypothesis of immune enhancement that could be pertinent to Covid-19. We also discuss how this risk could be mitigated so that both hyperimmune globulin and vaccines could be rapidly translated to overcome the current global health crisis.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Internalización del Virus , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Convalecencia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Células Dendríticas/virología , Salud Global , Interacciones Microbiota-Huesped/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Macrófagos/virología , Modelos Animales , Monocitos/virología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Plasma , Plasmaféresis , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Receptores Fc/inmunología , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(4): 504-511, 2018 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29029149

RESUMEN

Background: Pediatric diarrheal disease presents a major public health burden in low- to middle-income countries. The clinical benefits of empirical antimicrobial treatment for diarrhea are unclear in settings that lack reliable diagnostics and have high antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study of pediatric patients hospitalized with diarrhea containing blood and/or mucus in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Clinical parameters, including disease outcome and treatment, were measured. Shigella, nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS), and Campylobacter were isolated from fecal samples, and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined. Statistical analyses, comprising log-rank tests and accelerated failure time models, were performed to assess the effect of antimicrobials on disease outcome. Results: Among 3166 recruited participants (median age 10 months; interquartile range, 6.5-16.7 months), one-third (1096 of 3166) had bloody diarrhea, and 25% (793 of 3166) were culture positive for Shigella, NTS, or Campylobacter. More than 85% of patients (2697 of 3166) were treated with antimicrobials; fluoroquinolones were the most commonly administered antimicrobials. AMR was highly prevalent among the isolated bacteria, including resistance against fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins. Antimicrobial treatment and multidrug resistance status of the infecting pathogens were found to have no significant effect on outcome. Antimicrobial treatment was significantly associated with an increase in the duration of hospitalization with particular groups of diarrheal diseases. Conclusions: In a setting with high antimicrobial usage and high AMR, our results imply a lack of clinical benefit for treating diarrhea with antimicrobials; adequately powered randomized controlled trials are required to assess the role of antimicrobials for diarrhea.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Heces/microbiología , Adolescente , Campylobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Diarrea/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos , Shigella/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vietnam
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA