Influence of IL-6, IL-33, and TNF-α on human mast cell activation: Lessons from single cell analysis by flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms that govern priming and degranulation of human mast cells (MCs) remain elusive. Besides, most of our knowledge is based on experiments from which data only reflect an average of all stimulated cells. This study aims at investigating the effects of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-33, and TNF-α on IgE-dependent and IgE-independent activation of individual MCs. METHODS: MCs were derived from CD34+ progenitors isolated from 50 mL whole blood from 4 healthy controls and 5 birch pollen allergic patients. Passively sensitized MCs were preincubated with IL-6, IL-33, or TNF-α and stimulated with anti-IgE/birch pollen allergen or substance P, the latter being a ligand for the G-protein-coupled MRGPRX2-receptor. Activation-i.e., upregulation of CD203c-and anaphylactic degranulation-i.e., appearance of CD63-were measured using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Preincubation with IL-33 demonstrated upregulated CD203c density without degranulation. Subsequent IgE-dependent stimulation (anti-IgE/birch pollen allergen) resulted in higher appearance of CD63 as compared to cells without preincubation, indicating IL-33 to exert a priming effect (P = 0.04). IL-6 only increased allergen-specific responses but to a lesser extent than IL-33. Combination of IL-33/IL-6 had a synergistic effect, demonstrating more degranulation in response to allergen. TNF-α had no effect on IgE-mediated activation, nor synergistic effects with IL-33. Stimulation with substance P resulted in degranulation that could not be enhanced by preincubation. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, IL-33, and in a lesser extent IL-6, prime individual MCs for subsequent IgE-mediated activation. Moreover, this priming effect is synergistic. In contrast, none of the cytokines had a priming effect on MRGPRX2-mediated activation of MCs. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

State of the art and perspectives in food allergy (part II): therapy.

Currently management of food allergy is mainly based on absolute avoidance of the offending food(s) and the use of rescue medication. However, the risk of severe or life-threatening reactions due to inadvertent exposure, nutritional imbalance and social isolation raises the demand of disease-modifying treatments. The aim of the different treatments is to allow patients to safely ingest the offending food(s). However this unresponsiveness can be transient and requires continued treatment (desensitization) and has to be permanent and sustained also after stopping the treatment (tolerance). This review focuses on non-allergen specific (anti-IgE, Chinese herbal formula, etc..) and allergen specific treatments for food allergy. The anti-IgE treatment is at the moment the only non-allergen-specific therapy, for which some data on a temporarily clinical efficacy have been provided. Regarding allergen-specific treatments, different protocols (oral, sublingual, subcutaneous and epicutaneous) with natural, heat treated or recombinant food allergens have been investigated. Although promising, results of the different clinical trials are heterogeneous. In particular data on long-term effects are lacking. At the moment food specific immunotherapy can be considered an experimental interventional strategy, limited to research, and not yet ready for routine use.

Simultaneous flow cytometric detection of basophil activation marker CD63 and intracellular phosphorylated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in birch pollen allergy.

BACKGROUND: Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK is a crucial step in IgE-receptor signaling in basophils. The relation of p38 MAPK to the well-validated diagnostic cell surface marker CD63 has not been evaluated in a clinical allergy model. METHODS: Expression of CD63 and phosphorylation of p38 MAPK were analyzed flow cytometrically in anti-IgE-gated basophils from 18 birch pollen allergic patients, five grass pollen allergic patients, and five healthy individuals, after 3 and 20 min of stimulation with recombinant major birch pollen allergen (rBet v 1). Additional time points and the influence of p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 were studied in birch pollen allergic patients. RESULTS: Phospho-p38 MAPK and CD63 were expressed dose-dependently in birch pollen allergic patient basophils within 1 minute of rBet v 1 stimulation. P38 MAPK phosphorylation was fastest and subsided gradually while CD63 expression remained elevated for at least 20 min. Inhibition of p38 MAPK significantly inhibited CD63 upregulation. With optimal stimulation of the cells (1 µg/mL), sensitivity and specificity for the discrimination between patients and a group of control individuals (grass pollen allergic patients and healthy controls) were 94% and 100% for CD63 at 3 and 20 min and for phospho-p38 MAPK at 3 min. CONCLUSION: Antigen-induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation in human basophils essentially contributes to CD63 upregulation. It is a sensitive and specific intracellular marker for allergy diagnosis and offers new insight into the mechanisms of basophil activation.

Flow cytometric analysis of in vitro activated basophils, specific IgE and skin tests in the diagnosis of pollen-associated food allergy.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and commercially available skin prick tests have been demonstrated to be unreliable methods to diagnose pollen-associated food allergy. To evaluate the predictive value of the basophil activation test (BAT) in pollen-associated food allergy, the apple-mediated oral allergy syndrome (OAS) in patients with birch pollinosis was chosen as a representative model. METHODS: Patients with birch pollen allergy and a history of apple-mediated OAS (OAS(+), n = 29), patients with birch allergic without OAS (OAS(-), n = 22), and healthy controls (HC, n = 10) without birch pollen allergy and OAS were included. Apple IgE was quantified by the CAP FEIA method. Skin prick tests were performed with a Jonagold apple extract. Flow cytometric analysis of basophils activated with the same Jonagold extract was based on double staining with anti-IgE/anti-CD63 monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Comparison between OAS(+) subjects and HC showed sensitivities and specificities of 96% and 100% for apple IgE and 88% and 100% for the apple skin prick test, respectively. For the BAT, sensitivity and specificity were 100%. In contrast, when nonresponders on the BAT were considered, sensitivity decreased to 90%. In a separate analysis between OAS(+) and OAS(-) subjects, specificities decreased to 30% for apple IgE and to 80% for the apple skin test, respectively. The BAT reached a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 75%. CONCLUSION: Flow cytometry-assisted quantification of in vitro basophil activation seems to be a reliable instrument in the diagnosis of this model of pollen-associated food allergy. In addition, this study reemphasizes that the specificity of diagnostic allergy tests decreases considerably when, apart from HC, control individuals with cross-reactive antibodies are included.