Predicting pathologic venous invasion before pancreatectomy with venous resection: When does radiology tell the truth?

BACKGROUND: Patients factors in addition to radiological characteristics could predict the presence of pathologic venous invasion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy with venous resection. METHODS: We tested the predictive value of 6 radiological classification methods for predicting pathologic venous invasion-the Nakao, Ishikawa, MD Anderson, Lu, Raptopoulos, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network methods-on a cohort of 198 pancreatectomies (160 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 38 total pancreatectomies) with venous resection for pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Radiological and clinical factors determining pathologic venous invasion were identified by multivariable logistic analysis. RESULTS: Pathologic venous invasion was detected in 124 patients (63.2%). The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified Lu classification (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval =1.34-2.35; P < .0001), elevated serum CA19-9 values (odds ratio = 1.97, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-3.90; P = .04), and preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.79; P = .009) as independent factors associated with pathologic venous invasion. Radiological tumor-vessel contact greater than 50% of the circumference or venous wall deformity was associated with a significantly higher rate of pathological venous invasion (80% vs 52%; P < .0001), deeper (media-intima) venous invasion (47% vs 25%; P < .0001), R1 resection (58% vs 41%; P = .03), higher transfusions (84% vs 66%; P = .005), and arterial resection rates (43% vs 27%; P < .0001). Tumor-vein circumference contact of >50% and/or venous wall deformity was still associated with significantly higher rates of pathologic venous invasion, regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used or not and CA19-9 normalized or not under preoperative treatment. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiological detection of tumor-vein circumference contact >50% and/or venous wall deformity is associated with up to 80% of cases of pathological venous invasion. The combination of radiologic features with biological (CA19-9) and clinical (presence of preoperative chemotherapy) factors could better refine preoperatively the need for venous resection.

[Percutaneous tumor ablation]. / Destruction tumorale percutanée.

Percutaneous tumor ablation has faced a major growth in recent years with progressive expansion of clinical indications and subsequent adoption by national and international guidelines. Such techniques have become popular due to their minimally invasive profile and precise image-guided targeting resulting into a significant decrease of the procedure-related morbidity. Traditionally, malignant, and to lesser extent benign tumors, have been treated with these new techniques in several different organs including liver, kidney, lung and bone. More recently, other anatomic districts/organs including thyroid, breast, uterus and soft tissues have also been treated. Nevertheless, in order to optimize clinical results, precise knowledge of physical principles underlying these new techniques is of paramount importance, since technical adjustments may be provided according to specific tissue features (e.g. vascularization, density, etc.) and clinical indications of the procedure. Therefore, the goal of this review article is to present all the available ablation techniques with particular regard to their underlying physical principles and most common clinical indications.