Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are candidates for a bioprosthesis across the entire spectrum of risk. However, TAVR carries a risk for thrombotic and bleeding events, underscoring the importance of defining the optimal adjuvant antithrombotic regimen. Antithrombotic considerations are convoluted by the fact that many patients undergoing TAVR are generally elderly and present with multiple comorbidities, including conditions that may require long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) (eg, atrial fibrillation) and antiplatelet therapy (eg, coronary artery disease). After TAVR among patients without baseline indications for OAC, recent data suggest dual-antiplatelet therapy to be associated with an increased risk for bleeding events, particularly early postprocedure, compared with single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Concerns surrounding the potential for thrombotic complications have raised the hypothesis of adjunctive use of OAC for patients with no baseline indications for anticoagulation. Although effective in modulating thrombus formation at the valve level, the bleeding hazard has shown to be unacceptably high, and the net benefit of combining antiplatelet and OAC therapy is unproven. For patients with indications for the use of long-term OAC, such as those with atrial fibrillation, the adjunctive use of antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding. Whether direct oral anticoagulant agents achieve better outcomes than vitamin K antagonists remains under investigation. Overall, single-antiplatelet therapy and OAC appear to be reasonable strategies in patients without and with indications for concurrent anticoagulation. The aim of the present review is to appraise the current published research and recommendations surrounding the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, with perspectives on evolving paradigms and ongoing trials.

Oral anticoagulants in coronary heart disease (Section IV). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis - Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease.

Until recently, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the only available oral anticoagulants evaluated for long-term treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), particularly after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite efficacy in this setting, VKAs are rarely used because they are cumbersome to administer. Instead, the more readily manageable antiplatelet agents are the mainstay of prevention in ACS patients. This situation has the potential to change with the introduction of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are easier to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. The NOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were evaluated in phase III trials for prevention of recurrent ischaemia in ACS patients, most of whom were also receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Although at the doses tested rivaroxaban was effective and apixaban was not, both agents increased major bleeding. The role for the NOACs in ACS management, although promising, is therefore complicated, because it is uncertain how they compare with newer antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel, ticagrelor or vorapaxar, and because their safety in combination with these other drugs is unknown. Ongoing studies are also now evaluating the use of NOACs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, where their role is established, with coexistent ACS or coronary stenting. Focusing on CHD, we review the results of clinical trials with the NOACs and provide a perspective on their future incorporation into clinical practice.

Risk of bleeding after prehospital administration of high dose tirofiban for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In most patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), antiplatelet drugs are already administrated in the ambulance, before hospital admission. We investigated the safety of prehospital initiation of a high dose of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban on top of aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin. METHODS: It concerns a sub-analysis of the On-TIME 2 trial. 1398 patients were enrolled and 1275 patients (91.2%) had clinical follow up. Non CABG-related bleeding was defined according to the TIMI criteria. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of 30-day bleeding. The independent association between bleeding and mortality (30-day and 1-year) was evaluated using Cox proportional Hazard models. RESULTS: Bleeding (major or minor) was observed in 47 patients (3.7%), with only 13 patients (1%) with major bleeding. The strongest independent determinants of bleeding were age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p=0.011), Killip class >1 at admission (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3, p=0.020) and intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) use (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-11.1, p=0.003). High dose tirofiban was not an independent predictor of bleeding (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.2, p=0.116). Bleeding was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (HR 5.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.8, p<0.001) and one-year mortality (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.2, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Prehospital use of high dose tirofiban is safe and associated with a low risk of bleeding. Age, Killip class >1, IABP use, but not high dose tirofiban are independent determinants of bleeding in STEMI patients. Bleeding is independently associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Higher efficacy of pre-hospital tirofiban with longer pre-treatment time to primary PCI: protection for the negative impact of time delay.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of longer duration of pre-hospital initiated antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy on outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this sub-analysis of the Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 trial, we studied, in 1,370 patients, the effect of pre-treatment time (time from administering study medication to time of angiography) on complete ST-segment resolution (STR), initial patency and 30-day mortality. Study medication consisted of high dose tirofiban (HDT) or control (placebo or no HDT) on top of high dose clopidogrel, aspirin and unfractionated heparin. Median pre-treatment time was 55 min (44-70). Longer pre-treatment was associated with longer transportation times, longer in-hospital delay, longer total ischaemic time (all p<0.001) and higher 30-day mortality (3.6% vs. 1.8%, p=0.046). Longer HDT pre-treatment time was independently associated with increased complete STR both before (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95%; confidence interval [CI] 0.98-2.32; p=0.06) and after PCI (OR 1.43, 95%; CI 1.02-2.02; p=0.039) and with a significantly improved initial TIMI 2 or 3 flow (51.4% vs. 43.4%, p=0.042) and reduced 30-day mortality (2.1% vs. 5.0%, p=0.047) as compared to longer control pre-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Longer time delay before primary PCI is associated with increased mortality. Pre-treatment with high dose tirofiban, however, may compensate for this negative effect by improving ST-segment resolution and initial patency and by reducing mortality. Further studies should be performed to confirm that this is an attractive therapy for patients with longer delays to reperfusion.

Facilitated reperfusion with prehospital glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: predictors of complete ST-segment resolution before primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the On-TIME 2 trial: correlates of reperfusion before primary PCI.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcome of complete ST-segment resolution (STR) during transportation after pretreatment with dual or triple antiplatelet therapy in the Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 trial. METHODS: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized in the ambulance to pretreatment with high-dose tirofiban (HDT) or to a control pretreatment (placebo or no HDT) on top of 600-mg clopidogrel, 500-mg aspirin, and 5000-IU unfractionated heparin. Complete STR was defined as ≥70% STR on the electrocardiogram obtained before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with the inclusion electrocardiogram. RESULTS: Complete STR before PCI occurred in 16.8% (n = 188/1121) and more frequently in the HDT group (19.0% vs 14.6%, P = .05). Independent predictors for complete STR before PCI were younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.96, P = .01 per 10 year increase), fast diagnosis (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-1.0, P = .004 per 15-minute increase time from symptom onset to diagnosis), longer pretreatment time (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16, P = .003 per 15-minute increase time start study medication to angiography), and randomization to HDT (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9, P = .05). Complete STR before PCI was associated with very low 30-day (0.5% vs 2.8%, P = .07) and 1-year (1.1% vs 5.0%, P = .019) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Dual or triple antiplatelet pretreatment in the ambulance results in complete STR before PCI in 17% of patients. Fast ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis, prehospital initiation of pretreatment early after symptom onset, and HDT independently predicted STR before PCI. Complete STR is associated with improved clinical outcome.

Pre-hospital administration of tirofiban in diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: a sub-analysis of the On-Time 2 trial.

AIMS: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocking agents seem to improve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to compare the effect of pre-hospital administration of tirofiban in STEMI patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with primary PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pre-specified sub-analysis of the randomised On-Time II trial (n=984) and it's open label run-in phase (n=414), which investigated pre-hospital administration of high dose tirofiban in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Two-hundred and twenty (16%) diabetic patients (known DM or Hba1C ≥6.2%) were included, 101 in the placebo group and 119 in the tirofiban group. In patients with DM, randomisation to tirofiban resulted in a lower residual ST deviation (5.1±8.5 mm vs. 6.2±5.6 mm, p=0.003), a reduced infarct size (CK 1694±1925 U/L vs. CK 2040±1829 U/L, p=0.02) and a trend towards lower one-year mortality (4.6% vs. 11.6%, p=0.07). The beneficial effects of tirofiban were more pronounced in diabetic patients compared to patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital administration of tirofiban in diabetic STEMI patients treated with primary PCI improves ST resolution and reduces myocardial infarct size. Tirofiban seems particularly beneficial in patients with diabetes.

Prehospital triple antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction leads to better platelet aggregation inhibition and clinical outcome than dual antiplatelet therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prehospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban in addition to high-dose clopidogrel results in more adequate inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and better clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Prespecified two-centre substudy of the prospective, international, multicentre, placebo controlled Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation trial 2 (On-TIME-2 trial). 648 of 964 (67%) patients in the On-TIME-2 trial with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI were studied. Pre-PCI IPA after early prehospital initiation of high-bolus dose (25 µg/kg) tirofiban was compared to placebo in addition to acetylsalicylic acid, unfractionated heparin and 600 mg clopidogrel. RESULTS: IPA was measured at a median of 60 min after study medication administration. In all four tests: Fe induced platelet aggregation, ADP induced platelet aggregation, platelet function analyser (PFA)-100 (collagen-epinephrine and collagen-ADP cartridge) IPA was higher in patients pretreated with high-dose tirofiban (p<0.001 for all tests), even after >74 min of pretreatment. Patients in the highest quartile of IPA had less residual ST segment deviation 1 h post-PCI (p value for trend: p=0.001, 0.004, 0.001, 0.002 respectively). There was a significant relationship between PFA-100 (both cartridges) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, p=0.028, p=0.035) and early thrombosis (p=0.009, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: 60 min of prehospital initiated antiplatelet treatment including high-dose tirofiban resulted in higher levels of IPA compared to pretreatment with acetylsalicylic acid and high-dose clopidogrel alone, even after longer pretreatment times. Levels of IPA were significantly related to ST resolution and MACE, including stent thrombosis. This substudy confirms the main findings of the On-TIME2 trial that clopidogrel alone is suboptimal, even at high dose and administered well in advance of primary PCI.

Effect of early, pre-hospital initiation of high bolus dose tirofiban in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on short- and long-term clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this trial was to study the effect of a high bolus dose (HBD) of tirofiban on clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: The On-TIME 2 (Ongoing Tirofiban In Myocardial infarction Evaluation 2) placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial showed that early administration of HBD tirofiban in the ambulance improves ST-segment resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The effect of early tirofiban treatment on clinical outcome is unclear. METHODS: The On-TIME 2 trial consisted of 2 phases: an open-label phase, followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. STEMI patients were randomized to either HBD tirofiban or no tirofiban (phase 1) or placebo (phase 2) in addition to aspirin, heparin, and high-dose clopidogrel. The protocol pre-specified a pooled analysis of the 2 study phases to assess the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at the 30-day follow-up and on total mortality at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: During a 3-year period, 1,398 patients were randomized, 414 in phase 1 and 984 in phase 2. Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days were significantly reduced (5.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.043). There was a strong trend toward a decrease in mortality (2.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.051) in patients who were randomized to tirofiban pre-treatment, which was maintained during the 1-year follow-up (3.7% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.08). No clinically relevant difference in bleeding was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Early, pre-hospital initiation of HBD tirofiban, in addition to high-dose clopidogrel, improves the clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI. (Ongoing 2b/3a inhibition In Myocardial infarction Evaluation; ISRCTN06195297).

Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

AIMS: To perform a thorough and updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials comparing tirofiban vs. placebo or vs. abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched for randomized trials comparing tirofiban vs. placebo or any active control. Odds ratios (OR) were computed from individual studies and pooled with random-effect methods. Thirty-one studies were identified involving 20,006 patients (12 874 comparing tirofiban vs. heparin plus placebo or bivalirudin alone, and 7132 vs. abciximab). When compared with placebo, tirofiban was associated at 30 days with a significant reduction in mortality [OR = 0.68 (0.54-0.86); P = 0.001] and death or myocardial infarction (MI) [OR = 0.69 (0.58-0.81); P < 0.001]. The treatment benefit persisted at follow-up but came at an increased risk of minor bleedings [OR = 1.42 (1.13, 1.79), P = 0.002] or thrombocytopenia. When compared with abciximab, mortality at 30 days did not differ [OR = 0.90 (0.53, 1.54); P = 0.70], but in the overall group tirofiban trended to increase the composite of death or MI [OR = 1.18 (0.96, 1.45); P = 0.11]. No such trend persisted at medium-term follow-up or when appraising studies testing tirofiban at 25 microg/kg bolus regimen. CONCLUSION: Tirofiban administration reduces mortality, the composite of death or MI and increases minor bleedings when compared with placebo. An early ischaemic hazard disfavouring tirofiban was noted when compared with abciximab in studies based on 10 but not 25 microg/kg tirofiban bolus regimen.

Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The most effective magnitude and timing of antiplatelet therapy is important in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We investigated whether the results of primary coronary angioplasty (PCI) can be improved by the early administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocker tirofiban at first medical contact in the ambulance or referral centre. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 24 centres in the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium. Between June 29, 2006, and Nov 13, 2007, 984 patients with STEMI who were candidates to undergo PCI were randomly assigned to either high-bolus dose tirofiban (n=491) or placebo (N=493) in addition to aspirin (500 mg), heparin (5000 IU), and clopidogrel (600 mg). Randomisation was by blinded sealed kits with study drug, in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was the extent of residual ST-segment deviation 1 h after PCI. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered, number ISRCTN06195297. FINDINGS: 936 (95%) patients were randomly assigned to treatment after a prehospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the ambulance. Median time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 76 min (IQR 35-150). Mean residual ST deviation before PCI (10.9 mm [SD 9.2] vs 12.1 mm [9.4], p=0.028) and 1 h after PCI (3.6 mm [4.6] vs 4.8 mm [6.3], p=0.003) was significantly lower in patients pretreated with high-bolus dose tirofiban than in those assigned to placebo. The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the two groups (19 [4%] vs 14 [3%]; p=0.36). INTERPRETATION: Our finding that routine prehospital initiation of high-bolus dose tirofiban improved ST-segment resolution and clinical outcome after PCI, emphasises that further platelet aggregation inhibition besides high-dose clopidogrel is mandated in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.