An In Vitro Perspective on What Individual Antimicrobials Add to Mycobacterium avium Complex Therapies.

For Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), current treatment regimens yield low cure rates. To obtain an evidence-based combination therapy, we assessed the in vitro activity of six drugs, namely, clarithromycin (CLR), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), amikacin (AMK), clofazimine (CLO), and minocycline (MIN), alone and in combination, against Mycobacterium avium and studied the contributions of individual antibiotics to efficacy. The MICs of all antibiotics against M. avium ATCC 700898 were determined by broth microdilution. We performed kinetic time-kill assays of all single drugs and clinically relevant two-, three-, four-, and five-drug combinations against M. avium. Pharmacodynamic interactions of these combinations were assessed using area under the time-kill curve-derived effect size and Bliss independence. Adding a second drug yielded an average increase of the effect size (E) of 18.7% ± 32.9%, although antagonism was seen in some combinations. Adding a third drug showed a smaller increase in effect size (+12.2% ± 11.5%). The RIF-CLO-CLR (E of 102 log10 CFU/ml · day), RIF-AMK-CLR (E of 101 log10 CFU/ml · day), and AMK-MIN-EMB (E of 97.8 log10 CFU/ml · day) regimens proved more active than the recommended RIF-EMB-CLR regimen (E of 89.1 log10 CFU/ml · day). The addition of a fourth drug had little impact on effect size (+4.54% ± 3.08%). In vitro, several two- and three-drug regimens are as effective as the currently recommended regimen for MAC-PD. Adding a fourth drug to any regimen had little additional effect. In vitro, the most promising regimen would be RIF-AMK-macrolide or RIF-CLO-macrolide.

Is there a role for tedizolid in the treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are hard to treat and have low cure rates despite intensive multidrug therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of tedizolid, a new oxazolidinone, for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus. METHODS: We determined MICs of tedizolid for 113 isolates of NTM. Synergy with key antimycobacterial drugs was assessed using the chequerboard method and calculation of the FIC index (FICI). We performed time-kill kinetics assays of tedizolid alone and combined with amikacin for M. abscessus and with ethambutol for M. avium. Human macrophages were infected with M. abscessus and M. avium and subsequently treated with tedizolid; intracellular and extracellular cfu were quantified over time. RESULTS: NTM isolates generally had a lower MIC of tedizolid than of linezolid. FICIs were lowest between tedizolid and amikacin for M. abscessus (FICI = 0.75) and between tedizolid and ethambutol for M. avium (FICI = 0.72). Clarithromycin and tedizolid showed initial synergy, which was abrogated by erm(41)-induced macrolide resistance (FICI = 0.53). Tedizolid had a weak bacteriostatic effect on M. abscessus and combination with amikacin slightly prolonged its effect. Tedizolid had concentration-dependent activity against M. avium and its efficacy was enhanced by ethambutol. Both combinations had a concentration-dependent synergistic effect. Tedizolid could inhibit the intracellular bacterial population of both M. avium and M. abscessus. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid should be further investigated in pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials for M. avium complex pulmonary disease. It is less active against M. abscessus, but still promising.

A Dutch Case Report of Successful Treatment of Chronic Relapsing Urinary Tract Infection with Bacteriophages in a Renal Transplant Patient.

We report a case of a 58-year-old renal transplant patient who developed a recurrent urinary tract infection with an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in the first month posttransplant. Even though it tested susceptible to carbapenems and despite repeated meropenem treatment, his infection recurred. The infection eventually evolved into epididymitis that was successfully treated with meropenem and bacteriophages. This case demonstrates the difficulty of treating relapsing ESBL-positive Gram-negative infections in renal transplant patients.

Clofazimine inhalation suspension for the aerosol treatment of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are recognized as a concern for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients due to increasing disease prevalence and the potential for detrimental effects on pulmonary function and mortality. Current standard of care involves prolonged systemic antibiotics, which often leads to severe side effects and poor treatment outcomes. In this study, we investigated the tolerability and efficacy of a novel inhaled therapeutic in various mouse models of NTM disease. METHODS: We developed clofazimine inhalation suspension (CIS), a novel formulation of clofazimine developed for inhaled administration. To determine the efficacy, minimum inhibitory concentrations were evaluated in vitro, and tolerability of CIS was determined in naïve mouse models over various durations. After establishing tolerability, CIS efficacy was tested in in vivo infection models of both Mycobacterium avium and M. abscessus. Lung and plasma clofazimine levels after chronic treatments were evaluated. RESULTS: Clofazimine inhalation suspension demonstrated antimycobacterial activity in vitro, with MIC values between 0.125 and 2 µg/ml for M. avium complex and M. abscessus. Administration into naïve mice showed that CIS was well tolerated at doses up to 28 mg/kg over 28 consecutive treatments. In vivo, CIS was shown to significantly improve bacterial elimination from the lungs of both acute and chronic NTM-infected mouse models compared to negative controls and oral clofazimine administration. Clofazimine concentrations in lung tissue were approximately four times higher than the concentrations achieved by oral dosing. CONCLUSION: Clofazimine inhalation suspension is a well tolerated and effective novel therapeutic candidate for the treatment of NTM infections in mouse models.

Minocycline treatment for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and Bayesian framework mathematical models.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of minocycline in the hollow-fibre system (HFS) model of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and to identify the optimal clinical dose. METHODS: Minocycline MICs for 55 MAC clinical isolates from the Netherlands were determined. We also co-incubated primary isolated macrophages infected with MAC with minocycline. Next, we performed a 28 day HFS-MAC model dose-response study in which we mimicked pulmonary concentration-time profiles achieved in patients. The HFS-MAC model was sampled at intervals to determine the minocycline pharmacokinetics and MAC burden. We identified the AUC0-24/MIC ratios associated with 1.0 log10 cfu/mL kill below day 0 (stasis), defined as a bactericidal effect. We then performed 10000 Monte Carlo experiments to identify the optimal dose for a bactericidal effect in patients. RESULTS: The MIC for 50% and 90% of cumulative clinical isolates was 8 and 64 mg/L, respectively. Minocycline decreased MAC bacterial burden below stasis in primary isolated macrophages. In the HFS-MAC model, minocycline achieved a microbial kill of 3.6 log10 cfu/mL below stasis. The AUC0-24/MIC exposure associated with a bactericidal effect was 59. Monte Carlo experiments identified a minocycline susceptibility MIC breakpoint of 16 mg/L. At this proposed breakpoint, the clinical dose of 200 mg/day achieved the bactericidal effect exposure target in ∼50% of patients, while 400 mg/day achieved this in 73.6% of patients, in Monte Carlo experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline at a dose of 400 mg/day is expected to be bactericidal. We propose a clinical trial for validation.

M ycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease (MAB-PD), caused by M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense or M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, is challenging.We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis based on studies reporting treatment outcomes for MAB-PD to clarify treatment outcomes for MAB-PD and the impact of each drug on treatment outcomes. Treatment success was defined as culture conversion for ≥12 months while on treatment or sustained culture conversion without relapse until the end of treatment.Among 14 eligible studies, datasets from eight studies were provided and a total of 303 patients with MAB-PD were included in the analysis. The treatment success rate across all patients with MAB-PD was 45.6%. The specific treatment success rates were 33.0% for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and 56.7% for M. abscessus subsp. massiliense For MAB-PD overall, the use of imipenem was associated with treatment success (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.65, 95% CI 1.36-5.10). For patients with M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, the use of azithromycin (aOR 3.29, 95% CI 1.26-8.62), parenteral amikacin (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.99) or imipenem (aOR 7.96, 95% CI 1.52-41.6) was related to treatment success. For patients with M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, the choice among these drugs was not associated with treatment outcomes.Treatment outcomes for MAB-PD are unsatisfactory. The use of azithromycin, amikacin or imipenem was associated with better outcomes for patients with M. abscessus subsp. abscessus.

A bedaquiline/clofazimine combination regimen might add activity to the treatment of clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are hard to treat. New antimicrobial drugs and smarter combination regimens are needed. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the in vitro activity of bedaquiline against NTM and assess its synergy with established antimycobacterials. METHODS: We determined MICs of bedaquiline for clinically relevant NTM species and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by broth microdilution for 30 isolates. Synergy testing was performed using the chequerboard method for 22 reference strains and clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Time-kill kinetics (TK) assays with resistance monitoring of bedaquiline alone and combined with clofazimine were performed for MAB CIP 104536 and M. avium ATCC 700898; bedaquiline/clarithromycin combinations were evaluated against M. avium ATCC 700898. Interactions were assessed for TK experiments based on Bliss independence. RESULTS: Bedaquiline had modest activity against tested NTM, with MICs between <0.007 and 1 mg/L. Bedaquiline showed no interaction with tested drugs against MAB or MAC. Lowest mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values were 0.79 with clofazimine for MAB and 0.97 with clofazimine and 0.82 with clarithromycin for MAC. In TK assays, bedaquiline showed a bacteriostatic effect. Clofazimine extended the bacteriostatic activity of bedaquiline against MAB and yielded a slight bactericidal effect against M. avium. The bedaquiline/clofazimine combination slowed emergence of bedaquiline resistance for M. avium but promoted it for MAB. Relative to Bliss independence, bedaquiline/clofazimine showed synergistic interaction over time for MAB and no interaction for M. avium and bedaquiline/clarithromycin showed antagonistic interaction for M. avium. CONCLUSIONS: Following these in vitro data, a bedaquiline/clofazimine combination might add activity to MAB and MAC treatment. The bedaquiline/clarithromycin combination might have lower activity compared with bedaquiline alone for MAC treatment.

Minocycline Has No Clear Role in the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Disease.

Mycobacterium abscessus causes a difficult-to-treat pulmonary disease (MAb-PD). After initial intravenous treatment, minocycline is recommended in the oral continuation phase of treatment. We determined the MICs, synergy, and time-kill kinetics of minocycline against M. abscessus With MICs of 8 to 512 mg/liter, rapid emergence of tolerance in time-kill assays, and no synergy with other drugs used to treat MAb-PD, minocycline appears ineffective against M. abscessus These in vitro data question its role as a MAb-PD treatment modality.

Failure of the Amikacin, Cefoxitin, and Clarithromycin Combination Regimen for Treating Pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus Infection.

In a hollow-fiber model, we mimicked the drug exposures achieved in the lungs of humans treated with standard amikacin, clarithromycin, and cefoxitin combination therapy for Mycobacterium abscessus infection. At optimal dosing, a kill rate of -0.09 (95% confidence interval, -0.04 to 0.03) log10 CFU per ml/day was achieved over the first 14 days, after which there was regrowth due to acquired drug resistance. Thus, the standard regimen quickly failed. A new regimen is needed.

In vitro synergy between clofazimine and amikacin in treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease.

Disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing in frequency. The outcome of treatment for NTM lung disease is poor, particularly lung disease caused by Mycobacterium simiae and M. abscessus. Exploring synergy between active available drugs is a sensible way forward given the lack of new active drugs. We tested for synergy between amikacin and clofazimine, using standardized methods, in 564 consecutive clinical isolates identified as 21 species of rapidly growing mycobacteria, 16 clinical M. avium complex isolates, and 10 M. simiae isolates. Clofazimine and amikacin are each active in vitro against NTM; 97% (n = 548) of the rapid growers revealed MICs of clofazimine of ≤1 µg/ml, and 93% (n = 524) proved susceptible to amikacin. The combination showed significant synergistic activity in 56 of 68 (82%) eligible M. abscessus isolates, 4 of 5 M. chelonae isolates, and 1 M. fortuitum and 1 M. cosmeticum isolate, with 4- to 8-fold decreases in MICs to both drugs. Significant synergy could also be demonstrated against all M. avium complex and M. simiae isolates, with fractional inhibitory concentrations of <0.5. Clofazimine and amikacin show significant synergistic activity against both rapidly and slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria. The safety and tolerability of adding clofazimine to amikacin-containing regimens should be tested in clinical trials, and the results of susceptibility tests for these two compounds and their combination merit clinical validation. Synergy between clofazimine and other antibiotics with intracellular targets should be explored.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease treatment.

RATIONALE: Currently recommended multidrug treatment regimens for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease yield limited cure rates. This results, in part, from incomplete understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs. OBJECTIVES: To study pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug interactions of multidrug treatment regimens in a large cohort of patients with MAC lung disease. METHODS: We retrospectively collected pharmacokinetic data of all patients treated for MAC lung disease in the Adult Care Unit at National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, in the January 2006 to January 2010 period; we retrospectively calculated areas under the time-concentration curve (AUC). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of their MAC isolates were retrieved for pharmacodynamic calculations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 531 pharmacokinetic analyses, performed for 481 patients (84% females; mean age, 63 yr; mean body mass index, 21.6). Peak serum concentrations (C(max)) below target range were frequent for ethambutol (48% of patients); clarithromycin (56%); and azithromycin (35%). Concurrent administration of rifampicin led to 68%, 23%, and 10% decreases in C(max) of clarithromycin, azithromycin, and moxifloxacin. C(max)/MIC or AUC/MIC ratios associated with bactericidal activity were seldom met; 57% of patients achieved target ratios for ethambutol, versus 42% for clarithromycin, 19% for amikacin, 18% for rifampicin, and 11% for moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Currently recommended regimens for MAC lung disease yield important pharmacologic interactions and low concentrations of key drugs including macrolides. Pharmacodynamic indices for rifampicin, clarithromycin, amikacin, and moxifloxacin are seldom met. This may partly explain the poor outcomes of currently recommended treatment regimens. Trials of new drugs and new dosing strategies are needed.

Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasingly recognized as causative agents of opportunistic infections in humans. For most NTM infections the therapy of choice is drug treatment, but treatment regimens differ by species, in particular between slow (e.g. Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium kansasii) and rapid growers (e.g. Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium fortuitum). In general, drug treatment is long, costly, and often associated with drug-related toxicities; outcome of drug treatment is poor and is likely related to the high levels of natural antibiotic resistance in NTM. The role of drug susceptibility testing (DST) in the choice of agents for antimicrobial treatment of NTM disease, mainly that by slow growers, remains subject of debate. There are important discrepancies between drug susceptibility measured in vitro and the activity of the drug observed in vivo. In part, these discrepancies derive from laboratory technical issues. There is still no consensus on a standardized method. With the increasing clinical importance of NTM disease, DST of NTM is again in the spotlight. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of drug resistance in NTM, phenotypic methods for testing susceptibility in past and current use for DST of NTM, as well as molecular approaches to assess drug resistance.

Drug susceptibility testing and pharmacokinetics question current treatment regimens in Mycobacterium simiae complex disease.

The Mycobacterium simiae complex bacteria can cause opportunistic infections in humans. In the case of definite disease, there are no evidence-based treatment regimens and outcomes are very disappointing. To increase the evidence base underpinning treatment regimens for M. simiae complex disease, drug susceptibility patterns and rifampicin/ethambutol synergy were assessed retrospectively in 69 clinical M. simiae complex isolates from 60 patients (22 patients with M. simiae, 24 with Mycobacterium lentiflavum, 8 with Mycobacterium triplex, 5 with Mycobacterium parascrofulaceum and 1 with Mycobacterium stomatepiae) submitted to the mycobacteriology laboratory at National Jewish Health (Denver, CO). Quantitative drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed using the radiometric BacTec 460 macrodilution method. Results were related to pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements, where available. All M. simiae complex species proved susceptible to clarithromycin and, to a lesser extent, rifabutin, clofazimine, streptomycin and moxifloxacin. Synergy or additive action between rifampicin and ethambutol was observed for all species except M. simiae. Mycobacterium simiae is poorly susceptible in vitro to rifampicin and ethambutol alone as well as in combination; PK measurements support the limited efficacy of these drugs against M. simiae. The triple-drug regimen of a rifamycin, ethambutol and a macrolide may be advised to treat disease caused by M. lentiflavum, M. triplex, M. parascrofulaceum and M. stomatepiae; for M. simiae, this regimen appears less active. These findings may partly explain the limited treatment results in M. simiae disease. A treatment regimen including a macrolide, moxifloxacin and one or two additional drugs based on DST results may be advisable; clofazimine and amikacin or streptomycin are potential candidates.

The broad-spectrum antimycobacterial activities of phenothiazines, InVitro: somewhere in all of this there may be patentable potentials.

The phenothiazines are neuroleptic drugs that have long been known to have antimycobacterial activity, in vitro. Of the various commercially available phenothiazines, thioridazine, chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine are most active against mycobacteria, in vitro. Their MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis are in the 8-16 µg/ml range and MICs for Mycobacterium avium in the 10-32 µg/ml range, depending on methods and media. These concentrations cannot be safely attained in humans, where maximum serum concentrations are 0.5 µg/ml (thioridazine) to 1 µg/ml (chlorpromazine) or 4 µg/ml (trifluoperazine). Phenothiazines still have potential as antimycobacterial drugs because they accumulate in macrophages; concentrations inside macrophages are at least 10 fold higher than in serum. When applied to mycobacteria inside macrophages, concentrations as low as 0.1 µg/ml (thioridazine) or 0.1-3.6 µg/ml (chlorpromazine) kill phagocytized M. tuberculosis and M. avium in 3-7 days. Owing to their multiple and novel drug targets, phenothiazine resistance has not been observed. The drug targets and less toxic phenothiazine derivatives (patents include WO2005105145A and WO2010122012A) provide excellent patentable potentials. Thioridazine itself may be patented as "new use". New drugs for treatment of mycobacterial disease, most notable multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, are urgently needed; phenothiazines and their targets should be exploited for this use.