Effectiveness of a vitamin D regimen in deficient multiple myeloma patients and its effect on peripheral neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is common in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. More insight has been gained concerning the role of vitamin D in preventing PN. However, studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on PN are lacking. The aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of a vitamin D3 regimen on achieving adequate vitamin D levels in deficient MM patients and to (2) exploratively evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on PN. METHODS: Thirty-nine MM patients with inadequate (< 75 nmol/L [= 30 ng/mL]) 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were included in this multicenter, prospective, single-arm study, of whom 35 patients completed the study. They received oral vitamin D3 for 6 months according to a dose escalation regimen that consisted of one or two loading doses of 200,000 international units (IU), and maintenance doses of 800, 1600, or 3200 IU/day depending on the 25(OH)D level. A validated questionnaire was used to measure PN. RESULTS: Median 25(OH)D increased from 38 (IQR 32-52) nmol/L at baseline to 77 (IQR 72-87) nmol/L after 6 months (P < 0.001). Adequate 25(OH)D levels were achieved by 66% of the subjects, and 34% were within the range of 50-75 nmol/L. Furthermore, in 37% of the participants, PN severity decreased (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The use of substantially higher vitamin D3 doses than recommended in current guidelines resulted in a significant increase in vitamin D levels in MM patients. Furthermore, evaluation of PN showed a significant decrease in PN grading. However, this exploratory evaluation needs further confirmatory research.

Clinical view versus guideline adherence in ferritin monitoring and initiating iron chelation therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with >20 transfusions and ferritin levels >1000 µg/L, international guidelines recommend iron chelation therapy (ICT). The study's objective was to determine guideline adherence and the intensity of ferritin monitoring in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed an observational population-based study using the HemoBase Registry, which contains data of all MDS patients diagnosed since 2005 in Friesland, the Netherlands. Clinical information on transfusions, ferritin measurements, ICT, and clinical performance as defined by age ≤ 80 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index <2 and lower-risk MDS was collected from health records. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty seven of 292 patients (81.1%) received ≥1 transfusion, and 121 (41.4%) received >20 transfusions. In 57 of these 121 patients (47.1%), ferritin measurements were performed at least once. Clinical performance was significantly associated with monitoring ferritin around the 20th transfusion (RR: 2.49, p = .016). Clinical performance was also associated with initiating ICT (RR: 5.99, p < .001). ICT was offered to 22.3% (n = 25) of eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, ferritin levels were measured in <50% of MDS patients who received >20 transfusions, and clinical performance was significantly associated with measuring ferritin. Our study suggests that in heavily transfused MDS patients, ferritin monitoring is primarily based on patients' clinical performance rather than guideline recommendations.

Bone mineral density improves during 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

AIMS: To evaluate whether 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in combination with calcium/vitamin D supplements has an effect on lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients starting tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors or receiving conventional treatment. Secondly, to explore the development of radiographic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AS cohort receiving bisphosphonates based on clinical indication and available 2-year follow-up BMD measurements were included. BMD of lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip (total proximal femur) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Spinal radiographs (Th4-L4) were scored for vertebral fractures according to the Genant method. RESULTS: In the 20 included patients (median 52 years, 14 males), lumbar spine and hip BMD Z-scores increased significantly; median from -1.5 (interquartile range [IQR] -2.2 to 0.4) to 0.1 (IQR -1.5 to 1.0); P < .001 and median from -1.0 (IQR -1.6 to -0.7) to -0.8 (IQR -1.2 to 0.0); P = .006 over 2 years, respectively. In patients also treated with tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (n = 11), lumbar spine and hip BMD increased significantly (median 2-year change +8.6% [IQR 2.4 to 19.6; P = .009] and +3.6% [IQR 0.7-9.0; P = .007]). In patients on conventional treatment (n = 9), lumbar spine BMD increased significantly (median 2-year change +3.6%; IQR 0.7 to 9.0; P = .011) and no improvement was seen in hip BMD (median -0.6%; IQR -3.1 to 5.1; P = .61). Overall, younger AS males with limited spinal radiographic damage showed most improvement in lumbar spine BMD. Four mild radiographic vertebral fractures developed in 3 patients and 1 fracture increased from mild to moderate over 2 years in postmenopausal women and middle-aged men. CONCLUSION: This explorative observational cohort study in AS showed that 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in combination with calcium/vitamin D supplements significantly improves lumbar spine BMD. Mild radiographic vertebral fractures still occurred.

Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in nursing home residents ranges from 79% to 98%. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cross-sectional observational study in somatic and psychogeriatric nursing home residents was to determine the efficacy of a standardized oral vitamin D dosing regimen (VDDR) consisting of a loading dose (LD) of cholecalciferol 200,000 IU followed by a maintenance dose (MD) of 100,000 IU every 13 weeks in obtaining and maintaining an adequate and safe vitamin D trough level (VDTL), defined as 75-220 nmol/L (reference range). METHODS: Blood samples of nursing home residents who had received the LD followed by at least one MD were analyzed for VDTL, calcium, parathyroid hormone, and creatinine. Data on age, sex, race, body weight and height, co-morbidity, co-medication, number of MDs, calcium supplementation, smoking, and use of alcohol were obtained from patient charts. The primary outcome for the efficacy of the VDDR was the percentage of nursing home residents with a VDTL 75-220 nmol/L, with a target percentage of 85% for the dosing regimen to be considered efficacious. RESULTS: In 91 (58%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 50-66) of 156 included nursing home residents, a VDTL within the reference range was measured (mean [standard deviation] 81 [28] nmol/L, range 13-150 nmol/L). The only variable that was identified as a significant risk indicator for obtaining a VDTL ≥ 75 nmol/L was the number of MDs being four or more (≥ 4 vs. < 4; odds ratio 2.7; 95% CI 1.4-5.3). CONCLUSION: This standardized VDDR was not efficacious in obtaining and maintaining an adequate VDTL in this nursing home resident population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6029 (The Netherlands National Trial Register).

Vitamin D reduces eosinophilic airway inflammation in nonatopic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Low levels of vitamin D are associated with asthma severity, airway remodeling, and exacerbation rate increase, especially in nonatopic asthma. Reduced steroid responsiveness or impaired antimicrobial defense might be underlying mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation in patients with nonatopic asthma. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the effect of long-acting vitamin D3 (400,000 IU) on sputum neutrophils and eosinophils in 44 patients with nonatopic asthma with neutrophilic (≥53%) and/or eosinophilic (≥3%) airway inflammation. Sputum induction was performed at baseline and after 9 weeks. Other measurements included questionnaires, blood samples, and pulmonary function. RESULTS: Treatment with vitamin D did not significantly affect sputum neutrophils or eosinophils compared with treatment with placebo in the total group. Regarding sputum eosinophils, the effect of vitamin D appeared to be dependent on baseline sputum eosinophil levels (interaction P = .015). In patients with eosinophil levels of 26.2% or more (median in patients with sputum eosinophilia, >3%), eosinophils decreased from a median of 41.0% to 11.8% after vitamin D treatment as compared with an increase from 51.8% to 63.3% in patients receiving placebo (P = .034). Vitamin D treatment also resulted in slightly better Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation reduced eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with nonatopic asthma with severe eosinophilic airway inflammation, but did not affect sputum neutrophils. Also, a small effect on asthma control was observed. These findings suggest that vitamin D might have potential as an add-on treatment option in eosinophilic asthma.

An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-antirheumatic drugs according to rheumatologists and pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) must be recognized in a timely manner and managed appropriately to prevent adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failure. Because the evidence for most DDIs is based on case reports or poorly documented clinical information, there is a need for better assessment of their clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the interdisciplinary agreement between rheumatologists and clinical (hospital) pharmacists in assessing the clinical relevance of DDIs with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and non-DMARD medications. METHODS: Potential DDIs were identified from the medical literature using MEDLINE and EMBASE for the years 1968-2009. The following search terms were used for the key word, title, and abstract sections of the publications: interaction(s), DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s), antirheumatic, rheumatology, rheumatoid arthritis, and the names of the individual DMARDs of interest (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, auranofin, aurothioglucose, aurothiomalate, d-penicillamine, etanercept, gold, [hydroxy]-chloroquine, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL1-RA, infliximab, leflunomide, methotrexate, rituximab, and sulfasalazine/sulphasalazine). Reference lists of the retrieved publications were searched for further information on potential DDIs. All pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic DDIs between a DMARD and a non-DMARD identified were included in the study, with the exception of evidence regarding DMARD doses higher than used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and interactions with phytotherapeutic or homeopathic preparations. Using a standard information set for each DDI (eg, from product labeling, textbooks, and the medical literature), a group of rheumatologists and a group of clinical pharmacists independently assessed whether the individual drug-DMARD combinations interacted and whether they required immediate intervention. Both groups consisted of 3 members (2 men and 1 woman), aged 40 to 60 years, who had >5 years of clinical experience and were currently involved in clinical practice in large, nonacademic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Forty potential DDIs with DMARDs were retrieved and assessed by the 2 groups. For 30 (75%) of these, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists agreed about the requirement for immediate intervention. Specifically, 17 drug combinations (43%) were judged to interact and to require immediate intervention, and 13 combinations (33%) were judged either not to interact or to interact but not to require immediate intervention. For 10 combinations (25%), rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists were not in agreement. Overall, agreement between the groups was good (kappa = 0.80) for judging whether the drug combinations were interactions, and agreement was fair (kappa = 0.39) for judging whether immediate intervention was required. Prospective analysis of the data showed that rheumatologists tended to recommend immediate intervention more often when the adverse reaction to the DDI involved an increased risk of toxicity of the DMARD. In contrast, clinical pharmacists more often advocated immediate intervention when the adverse reaction involved decreased effectiveness of the DMARD. CONCLUSION: For a subset of DMARD-drug combinations, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists differed in their assessments of clinical relevance.