Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 172(2): 437-43, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25278165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a common skin disorder causing depigmented macules that can impair a patient's quality of life. Currently, there are no standardized outcome measures to assess the degree of depigmentation. Moreover, there is limited knowledge on the measurement properties of outcome measures in vitiligo. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability and responsiveness of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) and the Vitiligo European Task Force assessment (VETFa), two well-described clinician-reported outcomes. METHODS: We included three vitiligo patient groups. In one group of 31 patients, the interobserver reliability was assessed by three observers. In 27 patients the intraobserver reliability was assessed by two repeated measures by one of the observers. To assess the responsiveness the repigmentation was calculated after 6 months of phototherapy in 33 patients and tested against hypotheses. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability was high for VASI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0·93] and VETFa depigmentation (ICC 0·88). The intraobserver reliability was high for VASI (ICC 0·93) and VETFa depigmentation (ICC 0·97). The smallest detectable changes (SDCs) were 7·1% and 10·4% for interobserver reliability and 4·7% and 2·9% for intraobserver reliability in VASI and VETFa depigmentation, respectively. All four responsiveness hypotheses formulated a priori were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: VASI and VETFa are reliable and responsive instruments to assess the degree of depigmentation in vitiligo. VASI and VETFa for depigmentation are potential instruments for vitiligo research in the future. However, for use in individual patient care, caution is needed when interpreting score changes in individual patients because of the relatively large SDC.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vitíligo/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 168(1): 162-71, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23136900

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a common skin disease characterized by autoimmune melanocyte destruction. Recent genetic studies suggest a lower susceptibility to melanoma in patients with vitiligo; however, lifetime melanoma prevalence in patients with vitiligo has not previously been studied. Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) prevalence has been studied, but only in small studies and with contradictory results. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective, comparative cohort survey was designed to assess lifetime prevalences of melanoma and NMSC in patients with vitiligo compared with nonvitiligo controls. METHODS: Patients with nonsegmental vitiligo, who visited our clinic between January 1995 and September 2010, and were aged 50 years or older at the time of the study, were invited to participate in a postal survey. The questions regarded demographics, vitiligo characteristics, phototherapy history, skin cancer risk factors and the number of skin cancers experienced during the patient's lifetime. Patients were asked to have their partner fill in a control questionnaire. All skin cancers were validated by a pathology report. In total 2635 invitations were sent and 1307 eligible questionnaires were returned (50%). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to quantify adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between vitiligo and lifetime prevalences of melanoma and NMSC. RESULTS: Adjusted for confounders, patients with vitiligo had a threefold lower probability of developing melanoma (adjusted OR 0·32; 95% CI 0·12-0·88) and NMSC (adjusted OR 0·28; 95% CI 0·16-0·50). Subgroup analyses of patients treated with narrowband ultraviolet (UV) B, and psoralen and UVA did not show dose-related trends of increased age-adjusted lifetime prevalence of melanoma or NMSC. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients with vitiligo have a decreased risk of both melanoma and NMSC.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/complicaciones , Neoplasias Cutáneas/complicaciones , Vitíligo/complicaciones , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Fototerapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Quemadura Solar/complicaciones , Quemadura Solar/epidemiología , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Rayos Ultravioleta , Vitíligo/epidemiología
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 26(6): 690-5, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21711467

RESUMEN

Background Ultraviolet radiation following punch grafting may stimulate the migration of melanocytes from the grafts into the vitiliginous skin, thereby increasing the rate of repigmentation. We compared the effects of the 308-nm xenon chloride excimer laser (EL) vs. narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) after punch grafting in patients with vitiligo. Objectives The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) repigmentation (%); (ii) treatment satisfaction; and (iii) patient preferences for EL vs. NB-UVB therapy after punch grafting in vitiligo. Methods Fourteen patients were treated with the punch-grafting technique on two symmetrical vitiligo patches. Starting 1 week after the punch grafting, the vitiligo patches were treated twice a week during 3 months, with EL on one side and with NB-UVB on the other side. Repigmentation (%) was measured by a digital image analysis system. Patients' satisfaction and preference for treatment were also assessed. Results Whereas both treatment modalities induced repigmentation, no statistically significant difference was found in grade of repigmentation after 3 months. With EL, 71.4% lower cumulative dose was reached. Patients were significantly more satisfied with NB-UVB and preferred it over EL. Conclusions The choice between EL and NB-UVB cannot solely be based on repigmentation, but rather on other factors, such as patients' preferences. However, given the lower UV dose of EL, we recommend its use in vulnerable populations, such as in small children and patients with sun-damaged skin with a history of long-term UVB treatment.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser/métodos , Láseres de Excímeros , Fototerapia , Trasplante de Piel , Rayos Ultravioleta , Vitíligo/terapia , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Método Simple Ciego , Vitíligo/cirugía
4.
Br J Dermatol ; 165(5): 934-42, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21711337

RESUMEN

Hypertrophic scars are difficult to improve and remain a therapeutic challenge. Several lasers and light sources have been evaluated in the past decades and have been shown to improve hypertrophic scars. However, a systematic review is not available. To assess current evidence of efficacy of all laser and intense pulsed light therapies used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, we performed a systematic review searching electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. The quality of the controlled clinical trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Thirteen articles involving seven different lasers met the inclusion criteria. Most evidence was found for the pulsed dye laser (PDL) 585 nm (eight studies), followed by the PDL 595 nm (two studies), whereas limited evidence (one trial per laser) was available for the fractional nonablative laser 1540 nm, CO2 laser 10,600 nm, low-level laser therapy, Nd:YAG laser 532 nm and Erbium:YAG laser 2940 nm. Treatment recommendations should be formulated with caution as current evidence is insufficient for comparing the efficacy of different laser therapies. The PDL 585 nm showed a low efficacy for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. With moderate efficacy, the PDL 595 nm is promising, although more research is necessary. Little evidence was found for the efficacy of other lasers. Future research, with a low risk of bias, well-defined scar characteristics, validated outcome measures, standardized measurement methods, follow-up periods of at least 6 months and well-defined laser settings, is needed.


Asunto(s)
Cicatriz Hipertrófica/terapia , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Fototerapia/métodos , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sesgo de Publicación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA