Sorafenib (Nexavar) induces molecular remission and regression of extramedullary disease in a patient with FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia.

The fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) can be found in about one quarter of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [Small D. FLT3 mutations: biology and treatment. Hematology Am Soc Hematology. Educ. Program 2006;178-84 [Review]]. Patients who carry this mutation have a high risk of relapse even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [Sheikhha MH, Awan A, Tobal K, Liu Yin JA. Prognostic significance of FLT3 ITD and D835 mutations in AML patients. Hematol J 2003;4:41-6; Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ, Sanders JE, Smith FO, Woods WB, Radich JP, et al. Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in FLT3/ITD-positive AML. Blood 2006;108(1):400-1]. Recent reports show that Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor has significant activity against FLT3-ITD(+) blasts in vitro [Auclair D, Miller D, Yatsula V, Pickett W, Carter C, Chang Y, et al. Antitumor activity of sorafenib in FLT3-driven leukemic cells. Leukemia 2007;21(3):439-45]. We here report the first clinical case of molecular remission induced by Sorafenib in a patient with FLT3-ITD(+) AML and extramedullary disease after allogenic stem cell transplantation.

[Evaluation of the therapeutic benefit of 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma using the Modified Brunner-Score (MBS)]. / Bewertung des therapeutischen Gewinns von Patienten mit Pleuramesotheliom unter Therapie mit 41,8 degrees C Ganzkörperhyperthermie plus Ifosfamid, Carboplatin und Etoposid (ICE) anhand des Modifizierten Brunner-Score (MBS).

BACKGROUND: We performed a phase-II-study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i. e., ifosfamide (5 g/m (2) on day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m (2) on day 1) and etoposide (150 mg/m (2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, to assess the treatment benefit for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. To date this is mainly done by measurement of response rates and overall survival, as it can be widely found in the literature. In fewer cases there is also a quality of life assessment. Here we describe an instrument well-capable for a more comprehensive statement on the therapeutic benefit by linking several study end points including quality of life assessment, the Modified Brunner-Score (MBS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Modified Brunner Score (MBS) was used for this assessment. MBS integrates progression free survival, change of physical performance (WHO-index), a quality of life self-assessment by the patient and toxicity. A positive score means a therapy benefit and vice versa. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 22 were evaluable for assessment. Overall survival and progression free survival for all patients was 76 weeks (95 % CI 65.4 weeks - 87.8 weeks) and 29.6 weeks (95 % CI 24.4 weeks - 34.7 weeks) respectively. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and affection of the GI tract, like mucositis, nausea and vomiting. Mean Improvement of Performance Index (WHO) was 0.29 points. The MBS showed a score of 4.21 points (- 4.43 - 16.45 range) for the overall study group. 16 of 22 evaluable patients achieved a positive score. MBS is a suitable tool to evaluate the treatment benefit especially in non-standard therapy approaches. For WBH plus ICE, it showed a beneficial effect on overall quality of life in the majority of patients.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

We performed a phase II study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (150 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 25 patients were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 20% (five partial remissions; 95% CI 8.9-39.1%). Median survival time from the start of treatment for all patients was 76.6 weeks (95% CI 65.4-87.8 weeks). Progression free survival for all patients measured 29.6 weeks (95% CI 24.4-34.7 weeks). One year overall survival was 68% and 2 year overall survival was 20%. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 74 and 33% of treatment cycles, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis. These promising results are consistent with continued clinical investigation; a phase III clinical trial with whole body hyperthermia as the independent variable has been initiated.

[Chemotherapy in combination with whole-body hyperthermia in advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma]. / Chemotherapie in Kombination mit Ganzkörperhyperthermie bei fortgeschrittenem malignem Pleuramesotheliom.

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 57-year-old man presented with dyspnoea, cough, fatigue and weight loss. He had been exposed to asbestos 30 years ago. Physical examination was unremarkable apart from a suspected pleural effusion. INVESTIGATIONS: Computed tomography (CT) of the thorax showed multiple pleural masses with pleural effusion on the left side. CT of the abdomen and bronchoscopy were normal. The patient underwent explorative thoracoscopy; biopsies were taken, and diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma was demonstrated. TREATMENT AND COURSE: The patient was evaluated at the University Hospital Lübeck for Phase II experimental therapy with whole-body hyperthermia (WBH). The pretreatment evaluation revealed normal cardiorespiratory function and a normal contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. The patient's haematologic profile and electrolytes were normal. The WBH-radiant heat device (RHD) used for therapy was Aquatherm provided by the Cancer Research Institute (CRI, New York, USA). The patient received ifosfamide (5 g/m2, day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1), etoposide (150 mg/m2, days 2-3) combined with WBH at 41.8 degrees C (for 60 minutes). Two cycles were applied without complications and a partial remission of the disease was observed. CONCLUSION: Radiant heat whole body hyperthermia, in conjunction with a defined anticancer treatment and pharmacological approach to sedation, was a safe and effective palliative treatment in this patient.