Pycnogenol may alleviate adverse effects in oncologic treatment.

AIM: A large variety of adverse reactions are well known to frequently occur during chemotherapy and radiotherapy in oncology. Specific medications exist to target individual side effects. The aim of this study was to explore in a pilot trial whether supplementation with French maritime pine bark extract Pycnogenol could alleviate side effects and improve patient's quality of life. METHODS: Cancer patients who previously underwent surgery and who were in view of their pathology in relatively good condition, both physically and psychologically, were recruited for this study and divided into two groups. These patients received their first cycle of radiotherapy or chemotherapy, which lasted from 10 days up to 1 month. Then one group of patients received 150 mg Pycnogenol, the control group comparable placebo in a single-blinded fashion. The authors studied the occurrence of side effects and made attempts to judge their severity on a semi-quantitative visual analogue scale over a 2 months period starting after patients completed their first cycle of chemo- or radiotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty five radiotherapy patients receiving Pycnogenol showed a decreased frequency of essentially all investigated side-effects as compared to 21 patients receiving placebo, though in many categories the difference was limited. The most apparent improvements of acute side effects related to decreased soreness and ulceration in the mouth and throat as well as less dryness of the mouth and the eyes. A decreased incidence of nausea /vomiting, diarrhoea, edema and weakness was noticed, which was reflected by semi-quantitative evaluation suggesting that severity was only half or even less pronounced than in the control group. Only one case of deep vein thrombosis occurred in the Pycnogenol group whereas 2 cases of superficial vein thromboses and one case of deep vein thrombosis occurred in the control group (2.9% vs 10%). Thirty four chemotherapy patients were supplemented with Pycnogenol and another 30 patients were in the control group. For all patients this was the first chemotherapy treatment period. The Pycnogenol group presented with a lowered incidence of all investigated side effects as compared to the control group, though in many cases to a limited extent. The most prominent improvements were found for nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and weight loss. Semi-quantitative evaluation showed that here again symptom severity was half or less pronounced than in the control group. Various further symptoms improved such as cognitive impairment and also cardiotoxicity and neutropenia. Effects on anemia could not be investigated as several patients received erythrocyte transfusion. In the Pycnogenol group one case of superficial vein thrombosis was indentified while 3 cases of superficial vein thromboses and one deep vein thrombosis were detected in the control group (4% vs 19%). In both chemotherapy and radiotherapy patients Pycnogenol lowered the requirement for medication to address side effects. This was reflected by less days of hospitalisation the patients required. The authors did not investigate a possible interference with the anti-neoplastic efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapy. This possibility requires attention in future studies with Pycnogenol. From their previous clinical experience the authors suggest that alleviation of side effects described in this study results from Pycnogenol activities related to endothelial protection, and anti-inflammatory anti-edema activities. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot trial warrant further prospective studies with larger number of patients to validate benefits more specifically with regard to type of malignancy and treatment regimen.

A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Improving the response to preoperative therapy may increase the likelihood of successful resection of locally advanced rectal cancers. Historically, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate has been < approximately 10% with preoperative radiation therapy alone and < approximately 20% with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled on a prospective Phase I/II protocol conducted jointly at Washington University, St. Louis and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome evaluating a three-dimensionally (3D) planned boost as part of the preoperative treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent rectal cancer. Preoperative treatment consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the pelvis, with a 3D planned 90 cGy per fraction boost delivered once or twice a week concurrently (no time delay) with the pelvic radiation. Thus, on days when the boost was treated, the tumor received a dose of 270 cGy in one fraction while the remainder of the pelvis received 180 cGy. When indicated, nonaxial beams were used for the boost. The boost treatment was twice a week (total boost dose 900 cGy) if small bowel could be excluded from the boost volume, otherwise the boost was delivered once a week (total boost dose 450 cGy). Patients also received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1500 mg/m(2)-week) concurrently with the radiation as well as postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin. RESULTS: All 37 patients completed preoperative radiotherapy as planned within 32--39 elapsed days. Twenty-seven underwent proctectomy; reasons for unresectability included persistent locally advanced disease (6 cases) and progressive distant metastatic disease with stable or smaller local disease (4 cases). Actuarial 3-year survival was 82% for the group as a whole. Among resected cases the 3-year local control and freedom from disease relapse were 86% and 69%, respectively.Twenty-four of the lesions (65%) achieved an objective clinical response by size criteria, including 9 (24%) with pCR at the primary site (documented T0 at surgery). The most important factor for pCR was tumor volume: small lesions with planning target volume (PTV) < 200 cc showed a 50% pCR rate (p = 0.02). There were no treatment associated fatalities. Nine of the 37 patients (24%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (usually proctitis) during preoperative treatment. There were an additional 7 perioperative and 2 late toxicities. The most important factors for small bowel toxicity (acute or late) were small bowel volume (> or = 150 cc at doses exceeding 4000 cGy) and large tumor (PTV > or = 800 cc). For rectal toxicity the threshold is PTV > or = 500 cc. CONCLUSION: 3D planned boost therapy is feasible. In addition to permitting the use of nonaxial beams for improved dose distributions, 3D planning provides tumor and normal tissue dose-volume information that is important in interpreting outcome. Every effort should be made to limit the treated small bowel to less than 150 cc. Tumor size is the most important predictor of response, with small lesions of PTV < 200 cc most likely to develop complete responses.

Five fractions of preoperative radiotherapy for selected cases of rectal carcinoma: long-term tumor control and tolerance to treatment.

BACKGROUND: Randomized Swedish studies demonstrate the efficacy of a 5-fraction course of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma. The present study evaluates the results in a single U.S. institution over a 20-year period with a similar regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS: During the period of 1975-1995, 83 patients received pelvic radiotherapy of 20 Gy/5 fractions, followed by immediate surgery for rectal cancer. These patients represented 21% of cases receiving preoperative treatment; the remainder received 45-50 Gy preoperatively. The 5-fraction course was used for lesions deemed readily resectable but too bulky for conservative endocavitary treatment. Since 1990, it has been our policy to administer postoperative chemotherapy to medically fit patients who prove to have pathologic Stage II or III disease. Patient characteristics including age (mean 65 years, range 23-90), gender (45% male), and location within the rectum were comparable to our previously reported cases that received 45 Gy/25 fractions preoperatively. However, the group selected for 5 fractions preoperatively had relatively fewer lesions that were tethered (20% vs. 61%), circumferential (11% vs. 20%), or near obstructing (1% vs. 16%). RESULTS: With a post treatment follow-up of 1-15 years (mean 4.7), there have been 3 local failures and 12 distant failures, with an actuarial local control of 95%, and disease-specific survival of 77% at 5 and 10 years. Grade > or = 3 perioperative or late toxicity occurred in 11 cases (13%), including 3 (3.5%) late bowel obstructions. Stage II or III disease was found in 56% of the cases, 74% of which were free of disease at last follow-up. However, patients with Stage II or III lesions that were significantly tethered or fixed had a 40% greater likelihood of recurring than similar stage lesions that were, at most, slightly tethered. Sphincter-preserving surgery was possible in 60% of the patients. In recent years, postoperative chemotherapy has been administered to 16 patients with Stage II or III disease; this has been well tolerated, with only 1 late toxicity (cystitis managed medically). When compared with a matched group of cases receiving conventionally fractionated preoperative radiation, there were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity and nonradiotherapeutic cost generating factors (length of hospital stay, duration of postoperative antibiotics, blood loss at surgery). CONCLUSION: Patients with resectable rectal cancer who received 20 Gy/5 fractions preoperative radiotherapy to the pelvis had excellent local and distant control of disease. These patients were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. It would be of interest to conduct a randomized trial comparing short course with longer course (45 or 50 Gy) preoperative radiotherapy for resectable T3 lesions. The results of this study suggest that, in general, differences in toxicity, local control, and disease-free survival would probably be < 10%. However, since the results of this study suggest that patients with significantly tethered lesions may be better served with the higher dose and longer duration course of radiation, clinical degree of fixation should be included as a stratification parameter, and stopping criteria should be included for tethered lesions.