Current status of radiant whole-body hyperthermia at temperatures >41.5 degrees C and practical guidelines for the treatment of adults. The German 'Interdisciplinary Working Group on Hyperthermia'.

The term 'extreme' whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) describes the procedure of raising a patients' body-core temperature to 41.5-42.0 degrees C for 60 min. WBH represents the only hyperthermia technique that enables systemic heat treatment in patients with disseminated malignancies and is, therefore, usually combined with systemic chemotherapy. Up to now, several WBH-approaches have proved to be safe and associated with acceptable toxicity rates when radiant heat devices are employed. Until the late 1990s, the use of radiant WBH was restricted to a few specialized treatment centres worldwide. During the last 5 years, a larger number of WBH-devices were put into operation particularly in Germany. As a result, a novel generation on phase II trials on chemotherapy and adjunctive WBH in patients with various malignancies has been completed. Based on the promising results observed herein, first multi-centric phase III-trials on chemotherapy +/- WBH have been initiated, with a considerable number of patients treated at German institutions. The authors are members of the 'Interdisciplinary Working Group for Hyperthermia' ('Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Hyperthermie'), a sub-group of the German Cancer Society. They formulated these guidelines in order to standardize the WBH treatment procedure and supportive measures, to provide some uniformity in the selection of patients to be treated and to define criteria of a successful WBH-treatment. These recommendations may be helpful to ensure the quality of WBH performed at different institutions.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

We performed a phase II study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (150 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 25 patients were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 20% (five partial remissions; 95% CI 8.9-39.1%). Median survival time from the start of treatment for all patients was 76.6 weeks (95% CI 65.4-87.8 weeks). Progression free survival for all patients measured 29.6 weeks (95% CI 24.4-34.7 weeks). One year overall survival was 68% and 2 year overall survival was 20%. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 74 and 33% of treatment cycles, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis. These promising results are consistent with continued clinical investigation; a phase III clinical trial with whole body hyperthermia as the independent variable has been initiated.

Exacerbation of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome after treatment of localized cancer: a report of two cases.

Patients with malignancy often present with a variety of coagulation abnormalities which may ultimately lead to recurrent arterial and venous thromboses. Recently the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in cancer patients has been proposed as one of the potential mechanisms promoting hypercoagulability. Here we report two consecutive patients with localized tumors, one suffering from breast cancer and another presenting with colorectal cancer, who experienced dramatic exacerbation of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) within 4 weeks after surgery. In the first patient who had also received one course of adjuvant chemotherapy, major ischemic stroke and recurrent venous thromboembolism were paralleled by the development of ulcerative livedoid vasculitis and pancytopenia, constituting the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary APAS. In the second patient, progressive thrombotic occlusion of the superior and inferior vena cava was associated with bilateral pulmonary embolism, acute renal failure, and disabling soft tissue edema. Although not fulfilling the classic criteria of "catastrophic" APAS, the clinical features were life threatening and appeared to be refractory to oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon. In addition, a diagnosis of Trousseau's syndrome was unlikely due to missing evidence of gross metastatic disease. Besides a suggested treatment strategy comprising high doses of low-molecular-weight heparin, potential pathogenic mechanisms are discussed in consideration of a recently proposed "thrombotic storm," which may cause multiple thromboses after an initial provocation in patients with known hypercoagulability.

Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Second- and third-line treatments remain a challenge in advanced colorectal cancer. Studies of bimonthly regimens of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous infusion combined with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) have shown encouraging response rates in patients not responding to a bimonthly LV/5-FU regimen. Hyperthermic enhancement of L-OHP efficiency by increased DNA adduct formation has been demonstrated in vitro. This study was designed to address feasibility, toxicity and efficacy issues of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) as an adjunct to L-OHP/LV/5-FU in pretreated patients after progression to first- and second-line treatments with LV/5-FU by continuous infusion and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had progressed during or within 3 months after completion of chemotherapy with LV/5-FU 24-h infusion (LV/5-FU(24h)) (eight patients) or irinotecan combined with or after LV/5-FU(24h )(36 patients), were treated with L-OHP 85 mg/m(2), 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed by LV 200 mg/m(2), 1-h i.v. infusion, and 5-FU 3 g/m(2), 48-h continuous infusion. Every second cycle of the biweekly regimen was combined with WBH, thus allowing a comparison of toxicity with and without WBH in the same patient. Whole-body hyperthermia was administered by a humidified radiant heat device. The target temperature of 41.8 degrees C was maintained for 60 min. L-OHP (2-h infusion) was started at a core body temperature of 39 degrees C. RESULTS: All patients could be evaluated for toxicity, and 41 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 273 L-OHP-containing regimens were administered, 130 with and 143 without WBH. Hyperthermic treatment combined with L-OHP/LV/5-FU showed no unexpected toxicities. WHO grade 3 toxicities were rare and evenly balanced between cycles given with or without WBH. One early death occurred due to sepsis and tumor lysis. The overall response rate was 20%, with two complete and six partial responses. Twenty-three patients (56%) had stable disease and nine patients (22%) progressive disease. With a median observation time of 70 weeks, the median time to progression was 21 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-25 weeks] and the median survival was 50 weeks (95% CI 39-61 weeks) from the start of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests some advantage of combining L-OHP/LV/5-FU with WBH. Results compare favorably with the activity of similar regimens without WBH in less extensively pretreated patients. These data support further evaluation and warrant phase III studies.

[Addition of hyperthermia. Heat potentiates cancer therapy]. / Additiver Einsatz der Hyperthermie. Wärme macht Krebstherapie wirksamer.

It has been unequivocally demonstrated that hyperthermia (40-44 degrees C) has an potentiating effect on radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Technical improvements have facilitated the application of both local and whole-body hyperthermia, and have thus made this form of treatment available to large numbers of patients. Randomized phase III studies performed in patients with breast cancer, malignant melanoma and cervical cancer have convincingly confirmed the increased efficacy of the combination of radiotherapy with local or regional hyperthermia in comparison with radiotherapy alone. The effectiveness of other procedures such as the combination of radio- and chemotherapy with regional hyperthermia, regional thermochemotherapy and whole-body hyperthermia has so far been investigated mainly in phase II studies focusing on head and neck cancer, cervical and ovarian cancer, sarcoma, malignant germ cell tumors, and rectal carcinoma. However, the actual place of hyperthermia as a permanent element in a multimodal therapeutic concept has yet to be shown in prospective phase III studies.

UFT/leucovorin plus weekly irinotecan in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

This is an open-label, nonrandomized phase I trial to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan with a fixed dose of UFT plus oral leucovorin in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary objective of the study is to determine the response rate in this patient population. Adult patients with histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma and no prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease, or those patients who have received adjuvant chemotherapy (> 6 months prior to the study entry) will be eligible to participate. All patients must have measurable or evaluable lesions. Symptoms will be evaluated at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Computed tomography scans will be performed at baseline and every three cycles of treatment to assess tumor response. A total of six cycles of treatment may be given, depending on patient tolerance. Patients will be followed for a maximum of 12 months for time to progression, following the last dose of the study drug. Tumor response will be defined using standard World Health Organization criteria.

[Tumor oxygenation in combined whole body hyperthermia and polychemotherapy. Studies exemplified by recurrent carcinoma of the mouth cavity]. / Tumoroxygenierung unter kombinierter Ganzkörperhyperthermie und Polychemotherapie. Untersuchungen am Beispiel eines Rezidivkarzinoms der Mundhöhle.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported synergistic effects of combined hyperthermia and chemotherapy and/or irradiation. The response to irradiation and chemotherapy of well-oxygenated and vascularized tumors generally is better than that of hypoxic tumors. Therefore, tumor oxygenation is recognized as an important predictive factor in the therapy of malignant tumors. In practice, the head and neck area remains outside of the hyperthermia chamber during whole-body hyperthermia. It was the aim of this study to evaluate if the head and neck region receives sufficient warmth and, if so, if tumor oxygenation increases accordingly. PATIENTS/METHODS: Whole-body hyperthermia, as heat radiation (Enthermics Medical Systems RHS-7500), was applied to the narcotised 60-year-old male patient with a local recurrence tumor pT3 pN2b M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Tumor oxygenation and temperature were measured by LICOX catheters via one-point measurement during the entire hyperthermia treatment (3.5 h). Parallelly, chemotherapy (ifosfamide/Carboplatin) was given in four cycles (one cycle/month). RESULTS: With a latency of 10 min the increase of intratumoral temperature was comparable to temperatures achieved in the esophagus. The maximum intratumoral temperature was 41.8 degrees C. The average increase in tumor oxygenation was more than 100%. The clinical outcome in the case presented was a partial tumor remission (PR). CONCLUSIONS: During combined whole-body hyperthermia and polychemotherapy, tumor oxygenation is also significantly improved in the head and neck area, despite the fact that the head and neck area remained outside the hyperthermia chamber. The intratumoral temperature was comparable to esophageal and rectal temperatures.