RESUMEN
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Health and Human Services Victoria (DHHS), the Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium (MPCCC) and Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) pooled their combined infrastructure to establish the Victorian COVID-19 Cancer Network (VCCN) backed by a Taskforce of expert members. In a few short months, this state-wide clinical network implemented a number of new models of care including clinics to manage acutely presenting cancer patients away from emergency departments, chemotherapy in the home, telehealth models and addressing sustainability of clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comunicación , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Pandemias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Victoria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multicenter, randomized trial compared overall response rate between pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Secondary objectives included overall and progression-free survival, duration of response, toxicities, and biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ALIRI patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) with vitamin supplementation on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. FOLFIRI patients received irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, 29; on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29, 30, patients received leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) as 22-hour infusion. RESULTS: Of 132 patients randomly assigned, 130 patients (64 = ALIRI, 66 = FOLFIRI) received > or =1 dose of treatment. Response rates (ALIRI = 20.0%, FOLFIRI = 33.3%) were not significantly different between arms (p = 0.095). Progression-free survival was 5.7 months for ALIRI and 7.7 months for FOLFIRI (p < 0.001). Neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the major toxicities. There were 5 drug-related deaths (ALIRI = 4, FOLFIRI = 1). Biomarker analysis failed to reveal that any of the 18 preselected genes were clearly associated with tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: Neither efficacy nor safety improved on the ALIRI arm compared to the FOLFIRI arm. Progression-free survival on FOLFIRI was significantly longer compared to ALIRI. Potential biomarkers capable of predicting response to either regimen in advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma need further characterization.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Glutamatos/administración & dosificación , Guanina/administración & dosificación , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pemetrexed , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Secuencias Repetidas en Tándem , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , gamma-Glutamil Hidrolasa/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pemetrexed and vinorelbine are active antineoplastic agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase I objectives include maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose determination, and pharmacokinetics of the pemetrexed-vinorelbine doublet in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor patients (pts). Phase II objectives include tumor response evaluation, efficacy, and toxicity for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Phase I pts received pemetrexed (day 1, 300-700 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (days 1 and 8, 15-30 mg/m2) every 21 days. Pharmacokinetics determined at cycle 1. Beginning with dose-level 3, folic acid and Vitamin B12 supplementation were given. RESULTS: Thirty-one phase I pts were enrolled. MTD was pemetrexed 700 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2; and recommended phase II dose was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2. When administered in combination, pemetrexed and vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were consistent with single-agent administration. Thirty-seven (36 chemonaive) phase II NSCLC pts received pemetrexed-vinorelbine. Evaluable tumor response was 40%, with intent-to-treat 38%. One drug-related death occurred from febrile neutropenia with Staphylococcal infection. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (65%) and febrile neutropenia (11%), while prevalent grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was fatigue (27%). CONCLUSION: The pemetrexed-vinorelbine combination is well tolerated and shows activity as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.