[Evaluation of the therapeutic benefit of 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma using the Modified Brunner-Score (MBS)]. / Bewertung des therapeutischen Gewinns von Patienten mit Pleuramesotheliom unter Therapie mit 41,8 degrees C Ganzkörperhyperthermie plus Ifosfamid, Carboplatin und Etoposid (ICE) anhand des Modifizierten Brunner-Score (MBS).

BACKGROUND: We performed a phase-II-study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i. e., ifosfamide (5 g/m (2) on day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m (2) on day 1) and etoposide (150 mg/m (2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, to assess the treatment benefit for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. To date this is mainly done by measurement of response rates and overall survival, as it can be widely found in the literature. In fewer cases there is also a quality of life assessment. Here we describe an instrument well-capable for a more comprehensive statement on the therapeutic benefit by linking several study end points including quality of life assessment, the Modified Brunner-Score (MBS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Modified Brunner Score (MBS) was used for this assessment. MBS integrates progression free survival, change of physical performance (WHO-index), a quality of life self-assessment by the patient and toxicity. A positive score means a therapy benefit and vice versa. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 22 were evaluable for assessment. Overall survival and progression free survival for all patients was 76 weeks (95 % CI 65.4 weeks - 87.8 weeks) and 29.6 weeks (95 % CI 24.4 weeks - 34.7 weeks) respectively. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and affection of the GI tract, like mucositis, nausea and vomiting. Mean Improvement of Performance Index (WHO) was 0.29 points. The MBS showed a score of 4.21 points (- 4.43 - 16.45 range) for the overall study group. 16 of 22 evaluable patients achieved a positive score. MBS is a suitable tool to evaluate the treatment benefit especially in non-standard therapy approaches. For WBH plus ICE, it showed a beneficial effect on overall quality of life in the majority of patients.

A Systemic Hyperthermia Oncologic Working Group trial. Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH. METHODS: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim. RESULTS: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

We performed a phase II study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (150 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 25 patients were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 20% (five partial remissions; 95% CI 8.9-39.1%). Median survival time from the start of treatment for all patients was 76.6 weeks (95% CI 65.4-87.8 weeks). Progression free survival for all patients measured 29.6 weeks (95% CI 24.4-34.7 weeks). One year overall survival was 68% and 2 year overall survival was 20%. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 74 and 33% of treatment cycles, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis. These promising results are consistent with continued clinical investigation; a phase III clinical trial with whole body hyperthermia as the independent variable has been initiated.

Hyperthermia and mafosfamide in a human-derived malignant pleural mesothelioma cell line.

PURPOSE: Diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma is the most common primary pleural malignancy. At the beginning of the last century, this tumor was of minor incidence. Meanwhile, the use of asbestos has led to and is still leading to a rise in pleural mesothelioma incidence. There is no standard therapy for this highly aggressive disease and the development of new therapeutic strategies is imperative. METHODS: We, therefore, investigated the morphological and pharmakokinetic effects of a combined thermochemotherapy consisting of the administration of different dosages of mafosfamide with and without the application of a 1-h hyperthermia at 41.7 degrees C on the human biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma cell line MSTO-211H. After therapy, cells were prepared for light and electron microscopy. BrdU-incorporation for the S-phase fraction, TUNEL-labeling for detection of apoptosis, and quantitative assessments using the MTT assay were performed. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that the combination of mafosfamide with hyperthermia leads to qualitatively and quantitatively enhanced cellular damage compared to monotherapy. During combined thermochemotherapy, cell damage and death is already induced at lower mafosfamide concentrations than without hyperthermia which suggests an additive effect from hyperthermia to the action of the alkylating drug mafosfamide. Cell death thereby mostly occurs as necrotic cell death rather than as apoptosis, although in a combined thermochemotherapy apoptosis is induced temperature-dependently, when comparing temperatures from 37 degrees C to 43 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the effect of substances such as ifosfamide and cyclophosfamide which are in clinical use, might be enhanced by the combination of local or regional hyperthermia in order to improve the therapeutical index of these substances in the treatment of pleural mesothelioma.

Modulation of VP-16 cytotoxicity by carboplatin and 41.8 degrees C hyperthermia.

PURPOSE: To study in vitro the effect of carboplatin and/or hyperthermia in relation to etoposide (VP-16) cytotoxicity in L929 cells. METHODOLOGY/RESULTS: Cell survival assays demonstrated that the addition of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) hyperthermia and carboplatin to VP-16 produced an antagonistic effect relative to VP-16 cytotoxicity in L929 cells; administering carboplatin and hyperthermia 24 h before VP-16 reduced this drug resistance; administering carboplatin and hyperthermia 48 h before VP-16, however, produced a supra-additive cytotoxicity. In order to gain insight into the molecular basis for these observations, we investigated the effect of hyperthermia and/or carboplatin on the stress protein GRP78, which is known to affect VP-16 cytotoxicity. Results obtained were consistent with the hypothesis that carboplatin and hyperthermia perturbation of NAD + pools results in down-regulation of GRP78 with subsequent modulation of VP-16 cytotoxicity. To further explicate these results we studied G-361 as a control cell line that had significantly higher pretreatment NAD+ levels, which were not affected by carboplatin and/or hyperthermia. This cell line did not exhibit a down-regulation of GRP78 or modulation of VP-16 cytotoxicity as a function of carboplatin and hyperthermia. CONCLUSIONS: These data taken collectively, demonstrate a sequence effect (regarding the aforementioned antineoplastic agents), and provide a framework for future studies directed at the therapeutic optimization of the sequential application of carboplatin, hyperthermia, and VP-16.

A pilot study of whole body hyperthermia and carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) to carboplatin (CBDCA) can induce responses in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. 16 pretreated patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were entered on a Systemic Hyperthermia Oncological Working Group (SHOWG) study; (14 patients were eligible with 14 evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response). The patients were treated with WBH (Aquatherm) 41.8 degrees C x 60 min in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) (area under the curve (AUC) of 8) every 4 weeks. Disease status was evaluated every two cycles. Patients were treated for a maximum of six cycles. One patient had a complete response (CR) and 4 had a partial response (PR). 4 patients had stable disease (SD). 3 patients had progressive disease (PD). 2 patients were unevaluable: 1 had a bowel obstruction shortly after her first treatment; the second patient achieved a CR, but only had one treatment secondary to an idiosyncratic reaction to sedative drugs. 2 patients entered on study were ineligible, as they did not meet criteria for platinum resistance; 1 entered a CR and 1 had SD. Dose-limiting toxicity, which required CBDCA dose reductions, was grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3/4), and nausea and/or vomiting. Consistent with preclinical modelling, these results suggests that 41.8 degrees C WBH can overcome platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. These observations suggest further investigation of the therapeutic potential of WBH in a group of patients who historically fail to respond to salvage therapies is warranted.

Local hyperthermia, radiation, and chemotherapy in recurrent breast cancer is feasible and effective except for inflammatory disease.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of radiochemothermotherapy (triple-modality therapy) in patients with inoperable recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable recurrent lesions, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 2 or greater, life expectancy of more than 3 months, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function were eligible for this Phase I/II study. Conventionally fractionated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) was performed. Once-weekly local hyperthermia (HT) combined with chemotherapy (CT; epirubicin 20 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 1.5 g/m(2)) was applied within 30 min after RT. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients, all heavily pretreated (18/25 preirradiated), received a mean total dose of 49 Gy. The median number of HT/CT sessions was 4. Skin toxicity was low, whereas bone marrow toxicity was significant (leucopenia Grade 3/4 in 14/1 patients). The overall response rate was 80% with a complete response (CR) rate of 44%. Response rates in patients with noninflammatory disease (n = 14; CR 10 patients, partial response [PR] 3 patients) were far better than in patients with inflammatory disease (n = 11; CR 1 patient, PR 6 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent breast cancer, triple-modality therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. High remission rates can be achieved in noninflammatory disease, however, local control is limited to a few months. Whether the addition of chemotherapy has a clear-cut advantage to radiothermotherapy alone remains an open question.

Advanced non-seminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis with brain metastases: feasibility of additional brain irradiation and whole body hyperthermia plus chemotherapy.

Patients with brain metastases in disseminated non-seminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis are treated by combined modality, e.g., cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, whole brain irradiation and/or surgical excision. However, cure rates of patients refractory to that standard treatment are low (5-year survival rate <30%). Preclinical data on the use of hyperthermia combined with selected cytotoxic drugs clearly show increased tumor cell killing compared to chemotherapy alone with no increase in toxicity to normal tissue. These results are consistent with the concept that whole body hyperthermia (WBH) at 41.8 degrees C is non-myelosuppressive and can potentiate the tumoricidal effects of specific chemotherapeutic agents, thus improving the therapeutic index. We report on a patient with embryonal testicular cancer presenting with lung, liver and brain metastases who initially underwent orchiectomy, whole brain irradiation and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Restaging revealed minor regression of brain and lung metastases and no change of liver metastases. However, beta-HCG values dropped from initial 400000 mIU/ml to 12 mIU/ml with a normal alpha-fetoprotein all the time. Then, two cycles of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) plus chemotherapy were performed, followed by one cycle of chemotherapy without WBH. Radiotherapy, WBH and chemotherapy were well tolerated, especially no neurologic sequelae occurred. After more than 5 years of follow-up, the patient is still alive and disease-free. WBH plus chemotherapy seems to be feasible and may contribute to long-term survival in patients with advanced stages of non-seminomatous germ cell cancer refractory to standard treatment.

[Chemotherapy in combination with whole-body hyperthermia in advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma]. / Chemotherapie in Kombination mit Ganzkörperhyperthermie bei fortgeschrittenem malignem Pleuramesotheliom.

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 57-year-old man presented with dyspnoea, cough, fatigue and weight loss. He had been exposed to asbestos 30 years ago. Physical examination was unremarkable apart from a suspected pleural effusion. INVESTIGATIONS: Computed tomography (CT) of the thorax showed multiple pleural masses with pleural effusion on the left side. CT of the abdomen and bronchoscopy were normal. The patient underwent explorative thoracoscopy; biopsies were taken, and diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma was demonstrated. TREATMENT AND COURSE: The patient was evaluated at the University Hospital Lübeck for Phase II experimental therapy with whole-body hyperthermia (WBH). The pretreatment evaluation revealed normal cardiorespiratory function and a normal contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. The patient's haematologic profile and electrolytes were normal. The WBH-radiant heat device (RHD) used for therapy was Aquatherm provided by the Cancer Research Institute (CRI, New York, USA). The patient received ifosfamide (5 g/m2, day 1), carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1), etoposide (150 mg/m2, days 2-3) combined with WBH at 41.8 degrees C (for 60 minutes). Two cycles were applied without complications and a partial remission of the disease was observed. CONCLUSION: Radiant heat whole body hyperthermia, in conjunction with a defined anticancer treatment and pharmacological approach to sedation, was a safe and effective palliative treatment in this patient.

Nephrotoxicity of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) alone or combined with extracorporeal or radiant-heat-induced whole-body hyperthermia.

Although whole-body hyperthermia combined with specific genotoxic chemotherapy can be shown to enhance neoplastic cell killing without a concomitant rise in bone marrow toxicity, nephrotoxicity can become treatment-limiting. This study compares the kidney toxicity to the kidney of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy alone, and ICE chemotherapy combined with either extracorporeal (e-WBH) or radiant-heat-induced hyperthermia (r-WBH) in 43 patients with refractory sarcoma. Within 3 days of ICE chemotherapy treatment there was a significant increase in urinary protein excretion and a reduction of the glomerular filtration rate. These effects were more pronounced if WBH was added. The use of immunoluminometric assays revealed a predominance of low-molecular-mass proteins. This increase in protein excretion persisted in the e-WBH-treated group, whereas it vanished within 3 weeks in both the group treated with ICE alone and that treated with r-WBH. Our findings suggest that ICE chemotherapy causes transient tubular and glomerular damage, which is enhanced by WBH. In terms of long-term nephrotoxicity e-WBH was more nephrotoxic than r-WBH. This finding is consistent with our clinical observations.

Heat shock protein antibodies in sarcoma patients undergoing 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia.

Previous in vitro studies of sarcoma and normal cell lines exposed to 41.8 degrees C (x 60 min) demonstrated selective increased expression of members of the heat shock protein (HSP) family 70 on the cell surface of the sarcoma cells only. One implication of these data relates to the clinical application of targeting a stress-inducible, tumor-specific immune response. We therefore elected to measure immune response parameters (i.e., serum antibodies against HSP70i, 60, and 27) in six patients with sarcoma using a Western blot technique. These study patients received one to four successive 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) x 60-min treatments (given every 3 weeks). We also tested the serum of 10 untreated healthy control subjects for the same parameters. In all patients, baseline HSP antibody levels were detectable; in no case did WBH result in an increase in HSP antibodies. The serum of one patient with sarcoma demonstrated a strong nonfluctuating reaction against HSP27 before and after WBH that had no obvious correlation; this was not observed in the sera of the control subjects. This study suggests that WBH does not induce a B-cell response to HSP family 70 antigens; these data, however, do not exclude the possibility of NK cell activation due to HSP antigen presentation.

Whole-body hyperthermia combined with ifosfamide and carboplatin causes hypotension and nephrotoxicity.

It was previously postulated on the basis of clinical data that the cardiovascular sequelae of extracorporeal whole-body hyperthermia (e-WBH), i.e., hypotension (which requires catecholamine support) results in unique nephrotoxicity in combination with select chemotherapeutic agents. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, we mimicked e-WBH physiological conditions in a rat model. Animals were treated with and without ifosfamide (IFO) and/or carboplatin (CBDCA) at 37 degrees C or 41.5-41.8 degrees C, with blood pressure monitoring and catecholamine support comparable to the clinical setting. Ex vivo post-treatment data (24 h) from artificially perfused kidneys (i.e., histology, urine volume, perfusion rate, glomerular filtration rate, and the reabsorption of sodium, glucose, and water) demonstrated unique toxicity including proximal tubular necrosis for the combination of WBH and IFO, for WBH and CBDCA and for WBH and IFO plus CBDCA, but not for IFO and CBDCA without WBH. These data, considered together with results derived from a subsequent clinical trial and the laboratory work of others were consistent with the hypothesis.

Rationale and clinical status of local hyperthermia, radiation, and chemotherapy in locally advanced malignancies.

The combination of ionizing irradiation and local hyperthermia therapy has been demonstrated to be efficacious in a variety of localized neoplasms. One of the most consistent conclusions from this experience, however, is the finding that large tumor size is a significant negative prognosticator for attaining complete tumor regression. During the past decade investigators have begun to look at the possibility of adding chemotherapy to thermo-radiotherapy in order to improve the efficacy of treatment in patients with large tumors. This review article summarizes the recent clinical experience with such triple modality therapy.

Systemic hyperthermia and ICE chemotherapy for sarcoma patients: rationale and clinical status.

Preclinical studies are consistent with the concept that 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) can enhance the therapeutic index of specific chemotherapeutic agents. These laboratory investigations resulted in 2 phase I clinical studies, which also support this hypothesis. These trials were extended to 2 sequential phase II investigations of WBH plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for refractory sarcoma patients. The first study (involving 12 patients) using extra-corporeal WBH was prematurely closed to adopt a less toxic WBH technology, i.e., the radiant heat Aquatherm. To date, 12 patients have been accrued to the Aquatherm trial. Projections regarding reduced morbidity were correct. The response rate for ICE/WBH is currently 63%. The review to follow will summarize the results of these trials, as well as the laboratory and clinical data which serve to explicate the dramatic clinical results observed to date.

Optimization of chemotherapy administration for clinical 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia.

Preclinical data is consistent with the concept that the timing of chemotherapy during radiant heat-whole body hyperthermia (WBH) should affect therapeutic index. In order to test this hypothesis, a controlled clinical investigation was initiated. Patients received carboplatin (CBDCA) on an early or late schedule with respect to achieving target temperature (i.e. 41.8 degrees C) in alternating treatment cycles. The first cycle was randomized between patients regarding the early or late schedule for two planned sets per patient (i.e. four cycles). Ifosfamide, etoposide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor were delivered during all cycles with a standardized schedule. A total of 53 cycles involving 17 patients were analyzed. Detailed toxicity evaluation (i.e. delay in therapy secondary to thrombocytopenia, need for platelet transfusions, and days of hospitalization) taken collectively demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant advantage to delivering CBDCA 10 min after target temperature, during the plateau phase of WBH.

In vitro studies of the hyperthermic enhancement of activated ifosfamide (4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide) and glucose isophosphoramide mustard.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of hyperthermia on the cytotoxicity of glucose isophosphoramide mustard (D-19575), a derivative of ifosfamide, which does not require activation and preclinically demonstrates less nephrotoxicity and myelosuppression than ifosfamide. METHODS: In vitro studies (using a crystal violet cell survival assay) of the interaction of hyperthermia with D-19575, as well as the activated form of ifosfamide (4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide, D-18851), were performed using L929 and OVCAR-3 cell lines held at various temperatures (i.e. 37 degrees C (control), 40.5 degrees C, 41.8 degrees C, 42.5 degrees C, and 43 degrees C) for 65 min. RESULTS: The following thermal enhancement ratios (TER) were demonstrated: D-19575 in L929 1.2, 2.0 and 2.3 at 40.5, 41.8 and 42.5 degrees C, respectively; for D-18851 in L929 1.7 at 41.8 degrees C; for D-19575 in OVCAR-3 2.1, 3.2 and 3.3 at 40.5, 41.8 and 42.5 degrees C, respectively; for D-18851 in OVCAR-3 4.6 at 41.8 degrees C. CONCLUSION: The significant observed increase in cytotoxicity of D-19575 caused by hyperthermia taken together with its known preclinical toxicity profile, encourage its further preclinical and ultimately clinical testing, including its use with whole body and regional hyperthermia.