Collaborative Strategies to Improve Nutrition Security and Education: Lessons Learned During a Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic intensified disparities for underserved populations as accessing resources became more difficult. Dairy Council of California launched the Let's Eat Healthy initiative to address nutrition security through collaborative solutions in the school environment. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: To ensure nutrition security for children and families, nutritious food and nutrition education must go hand-in-hand. Improving access to high quality food can help address the health disparities that exist for people who are at increased risk for food insecurity. Nutrition education supports students' holistic learning and social and emotional learning skills. Nutrition education models must be increasingly flexible in the face of ongoing challenges. Collaborative efforts to connect food access hubs, such as schools, with support and resources to provide evidence-based nutrition education and agricultural literacy can equip individuals and communities with the knowledge, skills, and ability to make nutrient-rich food choices. CONCLUSIONS: Investments and strategies in nutrition security that utilize the Individual plus Policy, System, and Environmental (I + PSE) model, such as the Let's Eat Healthy initiative, will effectively influence positive behavior change and improve community health. Navigating challenges in a rapidly changing environment requires people and organizations to work together, across disciplines, to leverage knowledge, experience, resources, expertise, and creative thinking. Improving access to healthy food and nutrition education will be most effective when done through collaboration.

The Baltimore Urban Food Distribution (BUD) App: Study Protocol to Assess the Feasibility of a Food Systems Intervention.

Low-income urban communities in the United States commonly lack ready access to healthy foods. This is due in part to a food distribution system that favors the provision of high-fat, high-sugar, high-sodium processed foods to small retail food stores, and impedes their healthier alternatives, such as fresh produce. The Baltimore Urban food Distribution (BUD) study is a multilevel, multicomponent systems intervention that aims to improve healthy food access in low-income neighborhoods of Baltimore, Maryland. The primary intervention is the BUD application (app), which uses the power of collective purchasing and delivery to affordably move foods from local producers and wholesalers to the city's many corner stores. We will implement the BUD app in a sample of 38 corner stores, randomized to intervention and comparison. Extensive evaluation will be conducted at each level of the intervention to assess overall feasibility and effectiveness via mixed methods, including app usage data, and process and impact measures on suppliers, corner stores, and consumers. BUD represents one of the first attempts to implement an intervention that engages multiple levels of a local food system. We anticipate that the app will provide a financially viable alternative for Baltimore corner stores to increase their stocking and sales of healthier foods, subsequently increasing healthy food access and improving diet-related health outcomes for under-resourced consumers. The design of the intervention and the evaluation plan of the BUD project are documented here, including future steps for scale-up. Trial registration #: NCT05010018.

Food Access, Dietary Intake, and Nutrition Knowledge of Adults on Probation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine food access, dietary intake, and perceptions about diet and associations with health among adults on probation. DESIGN: Using a mixed-methods approach, interviews were used to understand food access, dietary intake, and diet and associations with health. A survey measured self-assessed diet quality and diet and associations with health. SETTING: One probation office in Rhode Island. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking adults on probation in 2016 (n = 22 interviews, n = 304 surveys). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Food access, dietary intake, knowledge about diet and health, and perceptions about healthy food. ANALYSIS: We used a thematic analytic approach to analyze the interviews. Descriptive statistics were performed for the survey. RESULTS: Many interviewees had inadequate food access, although most participated in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and some received food from food banks. Interviewees primarily shopped at grocery stores and prepared food at home, and dietary intakes did not meet the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Almost two-thirds (64.2%) of survey participants reported good or fair diet quality. Based on the survey results, the majority of participants strongly agreed and agreed with the statements, "The types of foods I eat affect my health" and "The types of food I eat affect my weight." CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study identified low-quality dietary intake and food acquisition strategies, such as shopping sales, buying bulk, and going to multiple stores, by US adults on probation to access food with limited resources. Participants reported interest in eating healthier foods and knew there was a connection between dietary intake and health. These data support addressing ways to improve food access and dietary quality, focusing on future programs and policies for this population.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Brazilian Community Restaurants for the Dimension of Low-Income People Access to Food.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of community restaurants (CRs), managed by the Government of the State of Bahia/Brazil, for the dimension of access to food. The study used secondary data obtained from the public opinion survey Profile of users of community restaurants in Salvador. The nutritional information was accessed through the analysis of CRs' menus. Adequate effectiveness of access to food was considered when the CR served meals to 50% to 70% of the users considered the target audience (individuals served by the two CRs located in the city of Salvador/Bahia/Brazil). The participants (n = 1464; 778 as low-income individuals) were adult CR users from Salvador/Brazil. Most of the respondents were male, 40 to 54 years old, not white, had up to 9 years of formal education, without a partner, and living in the municipality of Salvador. The evaluated CRs are effective in serving 53.1% of the target population in their total service capacity. Meal provision only reached an estimated 0.7% of the socially vulnerable community in the district. The average energy value of the meal served by the CR units was 853.05 kcal/meal, with a mean energy density composition classified as average (1.15 kcal/g). The effectiveness of the evaluated community restaurants showed that these instruments were minimally effective in promoting access to food for the low-income population within their total daily service capacity, and the current quantity of these facilities was insufficient. However, these instruments stand out in the fundamental role of promoting the daily distribution of meals to the Brazilian population with the highest social vulnerability levels.

A Systematic Review of Mobile Produce Markets: Facilitators and Barriers to Use, and Associations with Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake.

BACKGROUND: Diet-related chronic diseases are a major public health burden. There is growing awareness that disparities in healthful food access contribute to disparities in health. Mobile produce markets (MPMs) have emerged as a strategy to improve fruit and vegetable access and consumption, particularly among low-income, minority, and other vulnerable populations (eg, older adults and children) in food desert neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE: This review examined research on MPMs in the United States and specifically aimed to assess the relationship between MPM use and fruit and/or vegetable intake, and facilitators and barriers related to MPM use within a social ecological framework. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature consistent with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted. Articles published through December 2017 were identified using the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Agricola, and CAB Abstracts. MPM studies published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were eligible for inclusion if they were based on primary research of MPMs in the United States, included results, and if MPMs were analyzed separately from other market venues and sold predominantly fruits and/or vegetables. A total of 24 studies were identified for inclusion, which varied in study types as follows: quantitative (n=15), qualitative (n=3), and mixed methods (n=6). RESULTS: An association was found between MPM use and higher reported fruit and/or vegetable intake, although existing studies that measured fruit and vegetable intake were not rigorous in study design (eg, lack of control group, use of convenience sample, small sample size). MPM location was the most commonly cited facilitator of MPM use. Other institutional factors (eg, nutrition education), as well as policy factors (eg, food-assistance programs), community factors (eg, market site liaisons), interpersonal factors (eg, socializing at market), and intrapersonal factors (eg, awareness of the benefits of fruit and/or vegetable intake) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: MPMs offer a promising strategy to improve access to fruits and vegetables and may further support healthful-food purchasing and consumption through food-assistance incentives and enticements for consumers (eg, opportunities for social networking and nutrition education). Future research on MPMs would benefit from more rigorous experimental designs, such as including a control group, and examining multiple levels within a social ecological framework.

An Assessment of the Food and Nutrition Security Status of Weaned 7-12 Months Old Children in Rural and Peri-Urban Communities of Gauteng and Limpopo Provinces, South Africa.

This study assessed the food and nutrition security status of children receiving complementary food in rural and peri-urban communities. A group of 106 mothers from Lebowakgomo village and Hammanskraal Township, respectively, participated in the survey. Additionally, six focus group discussions were conducted per study area to assess the mothers' perceptions about children's food access. The Children's Food Insecurity Access Scale (CFIAS) was used to assess the food security status (access) of the children. The Individual Dietary Diversity Score (IDDS) together with the unquantified food consumption frequency survey were used as a proxy measure of the nutritional quality of the children's diets. The age and weight of the children obtained from the children's clinic health cards were used to calculate Weight-for-Age Z scores (WAZ) in order to determine the prevalence of underweight children. The findings showed that a large percentage of children were severely food-insecure, 87% and 78%, in rural and peri-urban areas, respectively. Additionally, Lebowakgomo children (23.6%) and Hammanskraal children (17.9%) were severely underweight. Overall, children's diets in both study areas was characterized by nutrient-deficient complementary foods. Cheaper foods with a longer stomach-filling effect such as white maize meal and sugar were the most commonly purchased and used. Hence, the children consumed very limited amounts of foods rich in proteins, minerals, and vitamins, which significantly increased the risk of their being malnourished.