Complementary roles of neural synchrony and complexity for indexing consciousness and chances of surviving in acute coma.

An open challenge in consciousness research is understanding how neural functions are altered by pathological loss of consciousness. To maintain consciousness, the brain needs synchronized communication of information across brain regions, and sufficient complexity in neural activity. Coordination of brain activity, typically indexed through measures of neural synchrony, has been shown to decrease when consciousness is lost and to reflect the clinical state of patients with disorders of consciousness. Moreover, when consciousness is lost, neural activity loses complexity, while the levels of neural noise, indexed by the slope of the electroencephalography (EEG) spectral exponent decrease. Although these properties have been well investigated in resting state activity, it remains unknown whether the sensory processing network, which has been shown to be preserved in coma, suffers from a loss of synchronization or information content. Here, we focused on acute coma and hypothesized that neural synchrony in response to auditory stimuli would reflect coma severity, while complexity, or neural noise, would reflect the presence or loss of consciousness. Results showed that neural synchrony of EEG signals was stronger for survivors than non-survivors and predictive of patients' outcome, but indistinguishable between survivors and healthy controls. Measures of neural complexity and neural noise were not informative of patients' outcome and had high or low values for patients compared to controls. Our results suggest different roles for neural synchrony and complexity in acute coma. Synchrony represents a precondition for consciousness, while complexity needs an equilibrium between high or low values to support conscious cognition.

Multisensory temporal function and EEG complexity in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic events.

Cognitive and perceptual comorbidities frequently accompany epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic events (PNEE). However, and despite the fact that perceptual function is built upon a multisensory foundation, little knowledge exists concerning multisensory function in these populations. Here, we characterized facets of multisensory processing abilities in patients with epilepsy and PNEE, and probed the relationship between individual resting-state EEG complexity and these psychophysical measures in each patient. We prospectively studied a cohort of patients with epilepsy (N=18) and PNEE (N=20) patients who were admitted to Vanderbilt's Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) and weaned off of anticonvulsant drugs. Unaffected age-matched persons staying with the patients in the EMU (N=15) were also recruited as controls. All participants performed two tests of multisensory function: an audio-visual simultaneity judgment and an audio-visual redundant target task. Further, in the cohort of patients with epilepsy and PNEE we quantified resting state EEG gamma power and complexity. Compared with both patients with epilepsy and control subjects, patients with PNEE exhibited significantly poorer acuity in audiovisual temporal function as evidenced in significantly larger temporal binding windows (i.e., they perceived larger stimulus asynchronies as being presented simultaneously). These differences appeared to be specific for temporal function, as there was no difference among the three groups in a non-temporally based measure of multisensory function - the redundant target task. Further, patients with PNEE exhibited more complex resting state EEG patterns as compared to their patients with epilepsy, and EEG complexity correlated with multisensory temporal performance on a subject-by-subject manner. Taken together, findings seem to indicate that patients with PNEE bind information from audition and vision over larger temporal intervals when compared with control subjects as well as patients with epilepsy. This difference in multisensory function appears to be specific to the temporal domain, and may be a contributing factor to the behavioral and perceptual alterations seen in this population.