Efficacy of Sunitinib in Patients With Favorable and Intermediate Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma - Lithuanian National Cancer Institute Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: According to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations, sunitinib is one of the recommended regimens for favorable and intermediate-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate sunitinib efficacy as a first-line treatment for mRCC patients with favorable/intermediate prognostic risk in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mRCC and confirmed as appropriate candidates for the first-line systemic treatment were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic risk was evaluated according to the model of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). RESULTS: Patients received sunitinib as a first-line treatment. A total of 94 patients were enrolled from 2019 to the 2020and 67 of them were included in the detailed analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 (95%CI=17.3-29.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 66 months (95%CI=44.9-87.1). The age over 60 years was a significant negative predictor for PFS and OS. Regarding the IMDC model for disease risk prediction, the number of two risk factors in the intermediate risk group was a significant predictor for a shorter response to the first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib is an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can be used as a first-line treatment in favorable/intermediate-risk groups of patients with mRCC, especially in countries where novel systemic treatment modalities are not yet available.

Multifunctional Nanoplatform Based on Sunitinib for Synergistic Phototherapy and Molecular Targeted Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a tumor that poses a serious threat to human health, with an extremely low five-year survival rate due to its difficulty in early diagnosis and insensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. To improve the therapeutic efficiency of HCC, we developed a novel multifunctional nanoplatform (SCF NPs) with an amphiphilic polymer (Ce6-PEG2000-FA) and a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. SCF NPs showed superior therapeutical efficiency for HCC due to the synergetic effect of molecular targeted therapy and phototherapy. The Ce6-PEG2000-FA not only serves as a nanocarrier with excellent biocompatibility but also can act as a therapeutic reagent for photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Furthermore, the folic acid group of Ce6-PEG2000-FA enhanced the active targeting performance of SCF NPs. As a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib in SCF NPs can play a role in molecular targeted therapies, including tumor growth inhibition and anti-angiogenesis. In vivo experiments, SCF NPs showed multimode imaging capabilities, which can be used for tumorous diagnosis and intraoperative navigation. Meanwhile, SCF NPs showed outstanding synergetic tumor inhibition ability. Tumors of SCF NPs group with laser radiation were eradicated without any recrudescence after 14 days of treatment. Such theranostic nanoparticles offer a novel therapeutic tactic for HCC.

Combination of Type I and II tyrosine kinase inhibitors-avapritinib and sunitinib-in refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure to multi-line therapy: a case report.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently the main treatment choice for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the long-term use of TKIs can lead to drug resistance. There is no study or clinical report of combination therapies of TKIs that have been approved for marketing. Combination pharmacotherapy is a new approach for patients who do not respond to monotherapy. This case provides a reference value for selective combination of TKIs in treating advanced GIST. Case Description: In this article, we report the case of a 55-year-old female who was diagnosed with duodenal GIST in April 2018 and underwent R0 resection. KIT exon 9 mutation was detected. The patient had disease recurrence with multiple abdominal metastases during imatinib adjuvant therapy after 27 months, and failure to 2nd-line sunitinib treatment after 6 months. She underwent a cytoreductive surgery (R1), and the postoperative mutation analysis suggested KIT exon 9 mutation, with newly found secondary KIT_exon16_p. L783V mutation and other mutations on TP53, POT1, and SETD2, etc. The patient experienced short-term tumor control of standard 3rd-line therapy of regorafenib and the rapid progression of the 4th-line of ripretinib afterwards. Different TKI combination therapies (i.e., ripretinib plus sunitinib, ripretinib plus avapritinib and avapritinib plus sunitinib) were administered to the patient sequentially. Ripretinib plus sunitinib led to stable disease but was discontinued due to intolerable adverse effects. Finally, the patient received a combination regimen of avapritinib plus sunitinib. The patient's tumor showed continuous shrinking in 2 consecutive computed tomography scan evaluations within 4 months with acceptable side effects. Conclusions: Combined type I and type II TKIs of avapritinib combined with sunitinib therapy achieved tumor regression for a heavily multi-line treated patient. Our case provides a reference for a savage treatment choice in refractory GISTs after failure to all standard treatment.

YTHDC1 is downregulated by the YY1/HDAC2 complex and controls the sensitivity of ccRCC to sunitinib by targeting the ANXA1-MAPK pathway.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sunitinib are multitarget antiangiogenic agents in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). They are widely used in the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cancer. However, resistance to TKIs is common in the clinic, particularly after long-term treatment. YTHDC1 is the main nuclear reader protein that binds with m6A to regulate the splicing, export and stability of mRNA. However, the specific role and corresponding mechanism of YTHDC1 in renal cancer cells are still unclear. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset was used to study the expression of YTHDC1 in ccRCC. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), wound healing, Transwell and xenograft assays were applied to explore the biological function of YTHDC1 in ccRCC. Western blot, quantitative real time PCR (RT‒qPCR), RNA immunoprecipitation PCR (RIP-qPCR), methylated RIP-qPCR (MeRIP-qPCR) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses were applied to study the YY1/HDAC2/YTHDC1/ANXA1 axis in renal cancer cells. The CCK-8 assay and xenograft assay were used to study the role of YTHDC1 in determining the sensitivity of ccRCC to sunitinib. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that YTHDC1 is downregulated in ccRCC tissues compared with normal tissues. Low expression of YTHDC1 is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with ccRCC. Subsequently, we showed that YTHDC1 inhibits the progression of renal cancer cells via downregulation of the ANXA1/MAPK pathways. Moreover, we also showed that the YTHDC1/ANXA1 axis modulates the sensitivity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We then revealed that HDAC2 inhibitors resensitize ccRCC to tyrosine kinase inhibitors through the YY1/HDAC2 complex. We have identified a novel YY1/HDAC2/YTHDC1/ANXA1 axis modulating the progression and chemosensitivity of ccRCC. CONCLUSION: We identified a novel YY1/HDAC2/YTHDC1/ANXA1 axis modulating the progression and chemosensitivity of ccRCC.

Shikonin Inhibits Cell Growth of Sunitinib-Resistant Renal Cell Carcinoma by Activating the Necrosome Complex and Inhibiting the AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway.

Therapy resistance remains a major challenge in treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), making more effective treatment strategies crucial. Shikonin (SHI) from traditional Chinese medicine has exhibited antitumor properties in several tumor entities. We, therefore, currently investigated SHI's impact on progressive growth and metastatic behavior in therapy-sensitive (parental) and therapy-resistant Caki-1, 786-O, KTCTL-26, and A498 RCC cells. Tumor cell growth, proliferation, clonogenic capacity, cell cycle phase distribution, induction of cell death (apoptosis and necroptosis), and the expression and activity of regulating and signaling proteins were evaluated. Moreover, the adhesion and chemotactic activity of the RCC cells after exposure to SHI were investigated. SHI significantly inhibited the growth, proliferation, and clone formation in parental and sunitinib-resistant RCC cells by G2/M phase arrest through down-regulation of cell cycle activating proteins. Furthermore, SHI induced apoptosis and necroptosis by activating necrosome complex proteins. Concomitantly, SHI impaired the AKT/mTOR pathway. Adhesion and motility were cell line specifically affected by SHI. Thus, SHI may hold promise as an additive option in treating patients with advanced and therapy-resistant RCC.

New frontiers against sorafenib resistance in renal cell carcinoma: From molecular mechanisms to predictive biomarkers.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly vascularized tumor and prone to distant metastasis. Sorafenib is the first targeted multikinase inhibitor and first-line chemical drug approved for RCC therapy. In fact, only a small number of RCC patients benefit significantly from sorafenib treatment, while the growing prevalence of sorafenib resistance has become a major obstacle for drug therapy effectivity of sorafenib. The molecular mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in RCC are not completely understood by now. Herein, we comprehensively summarize the underlying mechanisms of sorafenib resistance and molecular biomarkers for predicting sorafenib responsiveness. Moreover, we outline strategies suitable for overcoming sorafenib resistance and prospect potential approaches for identifying biomarkers associated with sorafenib resistance in RCC, which contributes to guide individualized and precision drug therapy.

Preclinical activity of cobimetinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma.

Background: The poor outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) necessitates new treatments. Cobimetinib is a MEK inhibitor and approved for the treatment of melanoma. This work investigated the efficacy of cobimetinib alone and in combination with anti-RCC drugs. Methods: Proliferation and apoptosis assays were performed, and combination index was analyzed on RCC cell lines (CaKi-2, 786-O, A-704, ACHN and A489) and xenograft models. Immunoblotting analysis was conducted to investigate the MAPK pathway. Results: Cobimetinib was active against RCC cells, with IC50 at 0.006-0.8µM, and acted synergistically with standard-of-care therapy. Cobimetinib at nontoxic doses prevented tumor formation, inhibited tumor growth and enhanced efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, sorafenib and sunitinib via suppressing Raf/MEK/ERK, leading to MAPK pathway inhibition. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the potent anti-RCC activity of cobimetinib and its synergism with RCC standard-of-care drugs, and confirm the underlying mechanism of the action of cobimetinib.

Skeletal Muscle Loss during Multikinase Inhibitors Therapy: Molecular Pathways, Clinical Implications, and Nutritional Challenges.

In cancer patients, loss of muscle mass is significantly associated with low tolerability of chemotherapy and poor survival. Despite the great strides in the treatment of cancer, targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could exacerbate muscle wasting. Over recent years, the impact of skeletal muscle loss during TKI therapy on clinical outcomes has been in the spotlight. In this review, we focus on the different molecular pathways of TKIs potentially involved in muscle wasting. Then, we report the results of the studies assessing the effects of different TKI therapies-such as sorafenib, regorafenib, sunitinib, and lenvatinib-on muscle mass, and highlight their potential clinical implications. Finally, we discuss an integrative nutritional approach to be adopted during TKI treatment. The assessment of muscle mass from computerized tomography imaging could be helpful in predicting toxicity and prognosis in patients treated with TKI such as sorafenib. Early recognition of low muscle mass and effective personalized nutritional support could prevent or attenuate muscle mass wasting. However, the role of nutrition is still overlooked, and future clinical trials are needed to find the optimal nutritional support to countermeasure muscle mass depletion during TKI therapy.

Relapse and Prognosis of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After Combined HOLRBT with Sunitinib and TGC Perfusion Chemotherapy.

Objective: To prevent postoperative relapse after HOLRBT, we compared postoperative adjuvant therapies. Methods: One hundred fifty patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) were meanly divided into three groups: A, B, and C. Group A patients only took sunitinib, group B patients underwent TGC perfusion chemotherapy, and group C patients took sunitinib and underwent TGC chemotherapy. Results: It was discovered that TGC perfusion chemotherapy combined with taking sunitinib can significantly reduce the relapse rate. Most of the tumor relapse period was assembled at 9 months after the operation. No-tumor relapse survival rate and no-fluorescence in situ hybridization positive survival rate in Group C were significantly higher than those of Group A and Group B. Conclusion: Therefore, the combined application of taking sunitinib drug and going through TGC perfusion chemotherapy after secondary HOLRBT will evidently improve the prognosis of patients with a glorious applicated prospect.

Expression of PBRM1 as a prognostic predictor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: PBRM1, located on 3p21, functions as a tumor suppressor and somatic mutation of PBRM1 is frequent in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aims to determine the influence of PBRM1 expression on the prognosis of patients with mRCC receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. METHODS: We identified 116 mRCC patients who were administered sunitinib or sorafenib as first-line therapy, between January 2006 and December 2016 at our institution. PBRM1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes between patients with low and high PBRM1 expression levels, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the prognostic value. Prognostic accuracy was determined using Harrell concordance index, and nomograms were built to evaluate the prognosis of mRCC. RESULTS: Patients with low PBRM1 expression had significantly shorter median PFS (9 vs 26 months, P < 0.001) and OS (21 vs 44 months, P < 0.001) than those with high expression. Multivariate analysis showed that PBRM1 expression was an independent predictor of PFS (HR 1.975, P = 0.013) and OS (HR 2.282, P = 0.007). The model built by the addition of PBRM1 improved the C-index of PFS and OS to 0.72 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of PBRM1 could be a significant prognostic factor for mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy, and it increases the prognostic accuracy of the established prognostic model.

Sunitinib versus sorafenib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment before the immune-oncology therapy era.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of sunitinib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment remains poorly documented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the efficacy and safety of sunitinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 by reviewing the medical records of patients treated at Jichi Medical University Hospital, Japan, between May 2008 and August 2016. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with sunitinib and 14 with sorafenib. Median progression-free survival in sunitinib- and sorafenib-treated patients was comparable, at 6.6 vs 5.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.618; 95% CI, 0.689-3.798; P = 0.2691). Median overall survival was also comparable, at 65.9 vs 58.0 months (HR, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.389-2.479; P = 0.9748). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were significantly more frequent in the sunitinib-treated than sorafenib-treated patients (P = 0.0357). Compared to pre-treatment values, estimated glomerular filtration rate at the discontinuation of treatment was not decreased in either group. In contrast, estimated glomerular filtration rate was decreased on long-term treatment, particularly in previously nephrectomized patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib and sorafenib had similar efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and severe renal impairment. Although renal function was not markedly impaired in either group, close attention to decreased renal function may be necessary in previously nephrectomized patients on long-term treatment.

Drug-Induced Hypertension Caused by Multikinase Inhibitors (Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib and Axitinib) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment.

This paper reviews current treatments for renal cell carcinoma/cancer (RCC) with the multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib and axitinib. Furthermore, it compares these drugs regarding progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse effects (AE), with a focus on hypertension. Sorafenib and sunitinib, which are included in international clinical guidelines as first- and second-line therapy in metastatic RCC, are now being challenged by new-generation drugs like lenvatinib and axitinib. These drugs have shown significant clinical benefits for patients with RCC, but all four induce a variety of AEs. Hypertension is one of the most common AEs related to MKI treatment. Comparing sorafenib, sunitinib and lenvatinib revealed that sorafenib and sunitinib had the same efficacy, but sorafenib was safer to use. Lenvatinib showed better efficacy than sorafenib but worse safety. No trials have yet been completed that compare lenvatinib with sunitinib. Although axitinib promotes slightly higher hypertension rates compared to sunitinib, the overall discontinuation rate and cardiovascular complications are favourable. Although the mean rate of patients who develop hypertension is similar for each drug, some trials have shown large differences, which could indicate that lifestyle and/or genetic factors play an additional role.

Carrier-Enhanced Anticancer Efficacy of Sunitinib-Loaded Green Tea-Based Micellar Nanocomplex beyond Tumor-Targeted Delivery.

Although a few nanomedicines have been approved for clinical use in cancer treatment, that recognizes improved patient safety through targeted delivery, their improved efficacy over conventional drugs has remained marginal. One of the typical drawbacks of nanocarriers for cancer therapy is a low drug-loading capacity that leads to insufficient efficacy and requires an increase in dosage and/or frequency of administration, which in turn increases carrier toxicity. In contrast, elevating drug-loading would cause the risk of nanocarrier instability, resulting in low efficacy and off-target toxicity. This intractable drug-to-carrier ratio has imposed constraints on the design and development of nanocarriers. However, if the nanocarrier has intrinsic therapeutic effects, the efficacy would be synergistically augmented with less concern for the drug-to-carrier ratio. Sunitinib-loaded micellar nanocomplex (SU-MNC) was formed using poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (PEG-EGCG) as such a carrier. SU-MNC specifically inhibited the vascular endothelial growth factor-induced proliferation of endothelial cells, exhibiting minimal cytotoxicity to normal renal cells. SU-MNC showed enhanced anticancer effects and less toxicity than SU administered orally/intravenously on human renal cell carcinoma-xenografted mice, demonstrating more efficient effects on anti-angiogenesis, apoptosis induction, and proliferation inhibition against tumors. In comparison, a conventional nanocarrier, SU-loaded polymeric micelle (SU-PM) comprised of PEG-b-poly(lactic acid) (PEG-PLA) copolymer, only reduced toxicity with no elevated efficacy, despite comparable drug-loading and tumor-targeting efficiency to SU-MNC. Improved efficacy of SU-MNC was ascribed to the carrier-drug synergies with the high-performance carrier of PEG-EGCG besides tumor-targeted delivery.

Sunitinib-and-Chinese herbal medicine-based systematic treatment clinically cured a patient with multiple metastatic primary clear cell carcinoma of the liver: a case report.

Primary clear cell carcinoma of the liver (PCCCL) is a rare and special type of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. However, treatment methods for multiple metastatic PCCCL are lacking. Here, we report the case of a 55-year-old male PCCCL patient with multiple metastatic lesions who was clinically cured by sunitinib-based systematic treatment. This patient was diagnosed with PCCCL in Liver Segment 7, Child-Pugh A liver function, Stage A in November 16, 2009, and received radical excision of the cancer immediately. His disease recurred with multiple metastatic lesions in the liver and other parts of the body, including the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, lung and bilateral adrenal nodules in June 29, 2012. The biopsy results showed that the lung mass was lung metastasis of PCCCL. With Child-Pugh A liver function, Stage C of PCCCL was diagnosed. Sunitinib (37.5 mg, oral, once a day [qd]) in combination with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) was given. The tumor size steadily reduced, and the lesions were no longer obvious in May 21, 2014. The patient had multiple metastases and is in complete response (CR) state until now. He is considered as clinically cured. From the initial diagnosis of PCCCL, the survival period reached 8 years.

Carnitine Supplementation Attenuates Sunitinib-Induced Inhibition of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Downstream Signals in Cardiac Tissues.

This study has been initiated to investigate whether sunitinib (SUN) alters the expression of key genes engaged in mitochondrial transport and oxidation of long chain fatty acids (LCFA), and if so, whether these alterations should be viewed as a mechanism of SUN-induced cardiotoxicity, and to explore the molecular mechanisms whereby carnitine supplementation could attenuate SUN-induced cardiotoxicity. Adult male Wister albino rats were assigned to one of the four treatment groups: Rats in group 1 received no treatment but free access to tap water for 28 days. Rats in group 2 received L-carnitine (200 mg/kg/day) in drinking water for 28 days. Rats in group 3 received SUN (25 mg/kg/day) in drinking water for 28 days. Rats in group 4 received the same doses of L-carnitine and SUN in drinking water for 28 days. Treatment with SUN significantly increased heart weight, cardiac index, and cardiotoxicity enzymatic indices, as well as severe histopathological changes. Moreover, SUN significantly decreased level of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPKα2), total carnitine, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) expression and significantly increased acetyl-CoA carboxylase-2 (ACC2) expression and malonyl-CoA level in cardiac tissues. Interestingly, carnitine supplementation resulted in a complete reversal of all the biochemical, gene expression and histopathological changes-induced by SUN to the control values. In conclusion, data from this study suggest that SUN inhibits AMPK downstream signaling with the consequent inhibition of mitochondrial transport of LCFA and energy production in cardiac tissues. Carnitine supplementation attenuates SUN-induced cardiotoxicity.

Association between age and sex and mortality after adjuvant therapy for renal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In phase 3 trials of patients with resected high-risk renal cell carcinoma, adjuvant sunitinib has demonstrated no overall survival (OS) benefit, an uncertain disease-free survival (DFS) benefit, and increased toxicity versus placebo. To identify patients who may derive benefit or harm from adjuvant therapy, the authors assessed the effects of age and sex on treatment outcomes in the phase 3 Adjuvant Sorafenib or Sunitinib for Unfavorable Renal Cancer (ASSURE) trial. METHODS: The authors conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of age and sex among patients in the ASSURE trial. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DFS were evaluated with sunitinib or sorafenib versus placebo in 4 patient subgroups defined by sex and median age at the time of the study. RESULTS: Sunitinib treatment was associated with decreased OS (HR, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.80) among women aged >56 years, but not in women aged ≤56 years or men of any age. Similar associations with age and sex were observed for DFS, but these were not statistically significant (women aged >56 years: HR, 1.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.94-2.10]). No such association was found for sorafenib. The interaction by age and sex on mortality was found to be statistically significant for sunitinib (P = .01), but not sorafenib (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant sunitinib may increase mortality among older women with renal cell carcinoma. Given the recent approval of adjuvant sunitinib for patients with high-risk resected renal cell carcinoma, additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Development of a validated LC-MS/MS method for the in vitro and in vivo quantitation of sunitinib in glioblastoma cells and cancer patients.

Sunitinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor and is currently being investigated against other forms of malignant tumors. Recently great interest has emerged for the application of sunitinib to glioblastoma treatment. In order to have a method with broad applicability it will be of importance to have access to a method that could be applied both in human plasma and cell uptake studies. No method has been reported thus far for the estimation of sunitinib uptake in glioma cells. We therefore set out to develop a method that could be applied for quantifying sunitinib in human plasma and in cell uptake studies. The method was validated and accredited according to ISO 17025:2005 guideline in human plasma and successfully applied to cancer patient plasma. Also, the method was effectively recruited to establish a protocol for the evaluation of sunitinib accumulation into M095K glioma cells. This method could significantly contribute to developmental phases in repurposing this drug in different cancer types.

Can levocarnitine supplementation improve fatigue caused by sunitinib as a treatment for renal cell carcinoma? A single-center prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential role of levocarnitine supplementation for cancer-related fatigue in patients treated with sunitinib. METHODS: Patients treated with sunitinib for unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma were enrolled prospectively. Assessment of fatigue in each patient was done using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) questionnaire. Evaluation of fatigue and the serum carnitine level was done at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after sunitinib therapy was initiated. All patients were treated with sunitinib 37.5 mg or 50 mg/day orally, with a 4-week administration and 2-week discontinuation schedule. RESULTS: Ten patients were finally enrolled in the study. Seven of them had worsened fatigue at the 2-week assessment and levocarnitine was administrated. All these seven patients whose serum carnitine level at 2 weeks was worse than at the baseline improved after 2-week-L-carnitine supplementation. For six of the seven (85.7%) patients who had L-carnitine supplementation, the BFI score at 4 weeks decreased compared to that at 2 weeks, which indicated improvement of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Levocarnitine supplementation for cancer-related fatigue in patients treated with sunitinib appears to have a potential benefit. However, further study with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up is crucial to confirm this.

Adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Adjuvant treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy has been reported through three clinical trials: S-TRAC, ASSURE and PROTECT. Only S-TRAC has been significantly positive on primary end-point disease-free survival under sunitinib compared to placebo, whereas ASSURE and PROTECT did not show any gain under sunitinib, sorafenib or pazopanib. This short review presents the differences between the trials and provides hypotheses on why S-TRAC may have been positive.

Sunitinib or Sorafenib as Neoadjuvant Therapy May not Improve the Survival Outcomes of Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of sorafenib or sunitinib as neoadjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus. METHODS: A total of 92 RCC patients with tumor thrombus were included in this 2-center retrospective research from January 2007 to December 2014. Sorafenib and sunitinib were administered as neoadjuvant therapy in 9 patients and 14 patients, respectively, and 69 patients constituted non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes of patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: The overall median RFS and OS time for all 92 patients were 28 months (95% CI 17-39 months) and 42 months (95% CI 30-54 months). Patients with neoadjuvant therapy had no significantly longer median RFS (30 vs. 28 months, p = 0.376) and OS (45 vs. 42 months, p = 0.702) than those without neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy of sorafenib or sunitinib might not improve survival outcomes for high risk RCC patients with tumor thrombus. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy for RCC with tumor thrombus should be considered cautiously.