[Treatment of tuberculosis: what is new?] / Therapie der Tuberkulose: Was gibt es Neues?

Never before have so many people around the world been simultaneously affected by tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death from a bacterial infectious disease worldwide. The World Health Organization's ambitious goal from 2014 of achieving global elimination of tuberculosis does not seem realistic, but on current trends, tuberculosis could be eliminated in the European Union by 2040. Since the beginning of 2022, there have been more innovations for the treatment of tuberculosis than in no other comparable time period before. One month of rifapentine and isoniazid is effective in treating latent tuberculosis infection. However, rifapentine is licensed in the USA but not in the EU and must be imported for individual cases. The duration of the standard treatment for tuberculosis can be shortened to four months but this treatment regimen is also based on rifapentine, in addition to isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin. The approval of rifapentine in Europe is a much-needed step towards shortening the treatment of tuberculosis. With new drugs an even shorter standard treatment of only 2 months is possible. The treatment of multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-/RR-TB) has been shortened to six months, the same length as the standard treatment available in Germany. The combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid ± moxifloxacin, cured around 90% of affected patients were cured in studies with a treatment duration of six months. With 19 drugs in clinical trials, the treatment of tuberculosis is expected to continue to improve rapidly in the coming years.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to antituberculosis drugs in Mozambique / Resistência de Mycobacterium tuberculosis aos tuberculostáticos em Moçambique

OBJECTIVE: To determine the drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mozambique. METHODS: We analyzed secondary data from the National Tuberculosis Referral Laboratory, in the city of Maputo, Mozambique, and from the Beira Regional Tuberculosis Referral Laboratory, in the city of Beira, Mozambique. The data were based on culture-positive samples submitted to first-line drug susceptibility testing (DST) between January and December of 2011. We attempted to determine whether the frequency of DST positivity was associated with patient type or provenance. RESULTS: During the study period, 641 strains were isolated in culture and submitted to DST. We found that 374 (58.3%) were resistant to at least one antituberculosis drug and 280 (43.7%) were resistant to multiple antituberculosis drugs. Of the 280 multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cases, 184 (65.7%) were in previously treated patients, most of whom were from southern Mozambique. Two (0.71%) of the cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were confirmed to be cases of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was most common in males, particularly those in the 21-40 year age bracket. CONCLUSIONS: M. tuberculosis resistance to antituberculosis drugs is high in Mozambique, especially in previously treated patients. The frequency of M. tuberculosis strains that were resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and streptomycin in combination was found to be high, particularly in samples from previously treated patients. .

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o perfil de resistência de Mycobacterium tuberculosis aos tuberculostáticos em Moçambique. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados dados secundários do Laboratório Nacional de Referência da Tuberculose, em Maputo, Moçambique, e do Laboratório Regional de Referência da Tuberculose, na Beira, Moçambique. Os dados foram relativos a amostras positivas à cultura e submetidas ao teste de sensibilidade aos tuberculostáticos de primeira linha durante o período de janeiro a dezembro de 2011. Os resultados do teste de sensibilidade foram analisados, e sua frequência foi comparada com o tipo de paciente e sua proveniência. RESULTADOS: Foram analisadas 641 cepas, isoladas em cultura e submetidas ao teste de sensibilidade. Das 641 cepas, 374 (58,3%) foram resistentes a pelo menos um tuberculostático e 280 (43,7%) revelaram-se multirresistentes. Dos 280 casos de tuberculose multirresistente, 184 (65,7%) eram pacientes com tratamento prévio, a maioria dos quais era oriunda da zona sul do país. Confirmou-se que 2 (0,71%) dos casos de tuberculose multirresistente eram casos de tuberculose extensivamente resistente a drogas. O sexo masculino foi o mais afetado, particularmente na faixa etária de 21 a 40 anos. CONCLUSÕES: A resistência de M. tuberculosis aos tuberculostáticos é elevada em Moçambique, especialmente em indivíduos com tratamento prévio. A resistência de M. tuberculosis à combinação de isoniazida, rifampicina e estreptomicina foi elevada, especialmente em amostras provenientes de indivíduos com tratamento prévio. .

Prevalência de resistência primária em pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar sem fatores de risco conhecidos para resistência primária / Prevalence of primary drug resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with no known risk factors for such

OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência de resistência primária aos medicamentos do esquema básico de tratamento antituberculose em pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar virgens de tratamento sem fatores de risco conhecidos para resistência primária, e identificar os possíveis fatores associados à resistência medicamentosa. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal exploratório com a análise de prontuários de pacientes que participaram de dois ensaios clínicos de tuberculose sensível entre 1&º de novembro de 2004 e 31 de março de 2011 no Ambulatório Prof. Newton Bethlem do Instituto de Doenças do Tórax da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Os critérios de inclusão foram ter idade > 18 anos, ter pesquisa direta de BAAR positiva na primeira amostra de escarro, ter cultura positiva para Mycobacterium tuberculosis, ter realizado testes de sensibilidade aos fármacos, ser virgem de tratamento para tuberculose e não ter história de prisão, hospitalização ou contato com caso de tuberculose resistente. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 209 pacientes. A prevalência de resistência primária geral foi de 16,3%. A prevalência geral de resistência à isoniazida e à estreptomicina foi, respectivamente, 9,6% e 9,1%, enquanto a prevalência de monorresistência à isoniazida e à estreptomicina foi de, respectivamente, 5,8% e 6,8%. A prevalência de resistência a dois ou mais fármacos foi de 3,8%, e a prevalência de tuberculose multirresistente foi de 0,5%. Não foram observadas associações estatisticamente significativas entre as variáveis estudadas e resultados do teste de sensibilidade aos fármacos. CONCLUSÕES: Na amostra estudada, a prevalência de resistência primária foi elevada apesar da ausência de fatores de risco conhecidos.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of primary resistance to the drugs in the basic treatment regimen for tuberculosis in treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and no known risk factors for such resistance, as well as to identify factors potentially associated with drug resistance. METHODS: This was an exploratory cross-sectional study. We analyzed the medical records of the subjects enrolled in two clinical trials of treatments for drug-susceptible tuberculosis between November 1, 2004 and March 31, 2011 at the Prof. Newton Bethlem Outpatient Clinic of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Thoracic Diseases Institute, located in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The inclusion criteria were being > 18 years of age, testing positive for AFB in the first sputum sample, having a positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, having undergone drug susceptibility testing, and being treatment-naïve. Patients with a history of imprisonment or hospitalization were excluded, as were those who had been in contact with drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. RESULTS: We included 209 patients. The overall prevalence of primary drug resistance was 16.3%. The overall prevalence of resistance to isoniazid and streptomycin was, respectively, 9.6% and 9.1%, compared with 5.8% and 6.8% for single-drug resistance to isoniazid and streptomycin, respectively. The prevalence of resistance to two or more drugs was 3.8%, and the prevalence of multidrug resistance was 0.5%. No statistically significant associations were found between the variables studied and drug susceptibility testing results. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the prevalence of primary drug resistance was high despite the absence of known risk factors.

Resistência primária e adquirida à pirazinamida em pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar atendidos em um hospital de referência no Recife / Primary and acquired pyrazinamide resistance in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated at a referral hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil

OBJETIVO: Verificar a resistência primária e adquirida à pirazinamida em cepas de Mycobacterium tuberculosis provenientes de amostras de escarro de pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo e descritivo realizado no período entre abril e novembro de 2011 em um hospital de referência para o tratamento de tuberculose em Recife (PE). Culturas, testes de sensibilidade a fármacos e testes da pirazinamidase foram realizados em um laboratório particular na mesma cidade. RESULTADOS: Dos 71 pacientes incluídos no estudo, 37 eram virgens de tratamento e 34 eram casos de retratamento. Desses, 0 (0,0%) e 14 (41,2%), respectivamente, apresentaram cepas resistentes à pirazinamida. Desses 14 isolados, 10 (90,9%) apresentaram resultados negativos no teste da pirazinamidase. Dos 60 isolados que apresentaram resultados positivos para o teste da pirazinamidase, 56 (93,3%) eram sensíveis à pirazinamida. CONCLUSÕES: A elevada frequência de cepas resistentes à pirazinamida em pacientes em retratamento da tuberculose destaca a necessidade da realização de testes de sensibilidade à pirazinamida antes de se escolher um novo esquema de tratamento.

OBJECTIVE: To determine primary and acquired resistance to pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in sputum samples from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive study conducted between April and November of 2011 at a referral hospital for tuberculosis in the city of Recife, Brazil. Cultures, drug sensitivity tests, and tests of pyrazinamidase activity were conducted in a private laboratory in Recife. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients included in the study, 37 were treatment-naïve and 34 represented cases of retreatment. Pyrazinamide-resistant strains were isolated in 14 (41.2%) of the 34 patients who had previously been treated for tuberculosis and in none of the 37 treatment-naïve patients. Of the 14 isolates, 10 (90.9%) tested negative for pyrazinamidase activity. A total of 60 isolates tested positive for pyrazinamidase activity. Of those, 56 (93.3%) were found to be sensitive to pyrazinamide. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of pyrazinamide-resistant strains (41.2%) in patients previously treated for tuberculosis highlights the need for drug susceptibility testing prior to the adoption of a new treatment regimen.

Retrospective comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the effect of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 171 patients with MDR-TB receiving either levofloxacin or moxifloxacin was performed. Treatment responses were categorized into treatment success (cured and treatment completed) or adverse treatment outcome (death, failure, and relapsed). RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 42.0 years. Approximately 56% of the patients were male. Seventeen patients had extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, and 20 had a surgical resection. A total of 123 patients (71.9%) received levofloxacin for a median 594 days, and 48 patients (28.1%) received moxifloxacin for a median 673 days. Other baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The moxifloxacin group had a significantly higher number of resistant drugs (p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of resistance to ofloxacin (p = 0.005) in the drug sensitivity test. The treatment success rate was 78.9% in the levofloxacin group and 83.3% in the moxifloxacin group (p = 0.42). Adverse reactions occurred at similar rates in the groups (p = 0.44). Patients in the moxifloxacin group were not more likely to have treatment success than those in the levofloxacin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 2.43; p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin showed equivalent efficacy for treating MDR-TB.