Behavioral and health outcomes from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-36 trial comparing two different adjuvant therapy regimens for early-stage node-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The NSABP B-36 compared four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) in node-negative early-stage breast cancer. A sub-study within B-36, focusing on symptoms, quality of life (QOL), menstrual history (MH), and cardiac function (CF) was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients completed the QOL questionnaire at baseline, during treatment, and every 6 months through 36 months. FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), symptom severity, and SF-36 Vitality and Physical Functioning (PF) scales scores were compared between the two groups using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. MH was collected at baseline and subsequently assessed if menstrual bleeding occurred within 12 months prior to randomization. Post-chemotherapy amenorrhea outcome was examined at 18 months and was defined as lack of menses in the preceding year. Logistic regression was used to test for association of amenorrhea and treatment. CF assessment was done at baseline and 12 months. Correlation analysis was used to address associations between changes in baseline and 12-month PF and concurrent CF changes measured by LVEF. RESULTS: FEC-100 patients had statistically significantly lower TOI scores during chemotherapy (P = 0.02) and at 6 months (P < 0.001); lower Vitality score at 6 months (P < 0.01), and lower PF score during the first year than AC patients. There were no statistically significant QOL score differences between the two groups beyond 12 months. No significant differences in symptom severity between the two groups were observed. Rates of amenorrhea were significantly different between FEC-100 and AC (67.4% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001). There was no association between changes in LVEF and PF (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant QOL differences between the two groups favored AC; however, the magnitude was small and unlikely to be clinically meaningful. There was a clinical and statistically significant difference in risk for amenorrhea, favoring AC. TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT00087178; Date of registration: 07/08/2004.

Updated guidance on the management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in pre- and postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant endocrine therapy induces bone loss and increases fracture risk in women with hormone-receptor positive, early-stage breast cancer (EBC). We aimed to update a previous position statement on the management of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) induced bone loss and now included premenopausal women. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of the medical databases from January 2017 to May 2020 and assessed 144 new studies. RESULTS: Extended use of AIs beyond 5 years leads to persistent bone loss in breast cancer extended adjuvant trials and meta-analyses. In addition to bone mineral density (BMD), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and trabecular bone score (TBS) were shown to independently predict fracture risk in real life prospective studies. FRAX® tool does not seem to be reliable for assessing fracture risk in CTIBL. In premenopausal women, there is strong evidence that intravenous zoledronate prevents bone loss but weak conflicting evidence on reducing disease recurrence from independent randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In postmenopausal women, the strongest evidence for fracture prevention is for denosumab based on a well-powered RCT while there is strong evidence for bisphosphonates (BPs) to prevent and reduce CTIBL but no convincing data on fractures. Adjuvant denosumab has failed to show anticancer benefits in a large, well-designed RCT. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Extended use of AIs and persistent bone loss from recent data reinforce the need to evaluate fracture risk in EBC women initiated on AIs. Fracture risk should be assessed with clinical risk factors and BMD along with VFA, but FRAX is not adapted to CTIBL. Anti-resorptive therapy should be considered in those with a BMD T-score < -2.0 SD or with ≥ 2 clinical risk factors including a BMD T-score < -1.0 SD. In premenopausal women, intravenous zoledronate is the only drug reported to prevent bone loss and may have additional anticancer benefits. In postmenopausal women, either denosumab or BPs can be prescribed for fracture prevention with pertinent attention to the rebound phenomenon after stopping denosumab. Adjuvant BPs, in contrast to denosumab, have shown high level evidence for reducing breast cancer recurrence in high-risk post-MP women which should be taken into account when choosing between these two.

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are several regimens recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for HER2-negative operable breast cancer. To our knowledge, no trials have yet been performed comparing these regimens head to head. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of NCCN-recommended chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to February 2020. We included randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant regimens in predominantly node-positive operable breast cancer patients. We compared (1) DDACT, (2) TCx4 cycles, (3) TAC, and (4) ACWKT. Common comparators were (5) AC, (6) ACT, and (7) ACD. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The Cochrane risk of bias tool assessed quality of the studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as measures of treatment effects with AC as reference. We used Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models with noninformative priors for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. Effectiveness was estimated by disease-free and overall survival using ORs. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Safety outcomes included febrile neutropenia. RESULTS: We identified 7 randomized controlled trials with 16,332 patients. TC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.71 [0.36-1.40]), TAC (0.77 [0.37-1.57]), ACWKT (0.68 [0.34-1.38]), and DDACT (0.72 [0.35-1.42]) were similar for overall survival. TC (0.64 [0.36-1.14]), TAC (0.67 [0.39-1.15]), ACWKT (0.63 [0.37-1.07]), and DDACT (0.59 [0.35-1.01]) had similar disease-free survival benefit. With regard to toxicity, TAC (2.67 [0.30-21.04]) had the highest odds of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The current generation of regimens are similar in efficacy. Given the lower toxicity of TCx4 comparatively, it is an acceptable alternative for lower-risk early-stage HER2-negative breast cancers.

ATAS Acupuncture Reduces Chemotherapy Induced Fatigue in Breast Cancer Through Regulating ADROA1 Expression: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of ATAS acupuncture (Acupoints-Time-Space Acupuncture) as a non-pharmacological intervention to prevent or relieve chemotherapy-induced fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing taxane chemotherapy. METHODS: A pilot study in Kunming center with the aim of evaluating 40 patients randomized to 3 groups: ATAS, sham and non-acupuncture with an unequal randomization of 2:1:1. Participants with stage I-III breast cancer were scheduled to receive adjuvant EC4P4 chemotherapy. Participants in the ATAS and sham acupuncture arms received 20 sessions of acupuncture over 20 weeks, non-acupuncture arm received usual care. Evaluation scales, including VAS-F, MFI-20, HDAS, ISI, and blood samples were collected at four timepoints (T1-T4). mRNA sequencing was performed to detect the mechanism of acupuncture. RESULTS: A total of 581 sessions of acupuncture were performed on patients in the acupuncture group. There was no difference between the three groups in terms of clinical characteristics. Patients randomized to ATAS acupuncture had improved symptoms including fatigue, anxiety and insomnia during the whole process of chemotherapy compared with the other two groups. The VAS-F score of ATAS acupuncture group was decreased compared with non-acupuncture group (P=0.004). The score of MFI-20 in ATAS acupuncture group was kept at low level, while the other two groups' scores kept climbing during chemotherapy (P=0.016; P=0.028, respectively). The mechanism of ATAS acupuncture which reduced fatigue and depression may be related to ADROA1, by regulating cGMP/PKG pathway. CONCLUSION: This pilot study has demonstrated that ATAS acupuncture can significantly reduce fatigue induced by chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-17,013,652, registered Dec 3, 2017. http://www.chictr.org.cn/. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 3.2 dated from 2018/04/20.

Effects of Radiation Therapy and Comorbidity on Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality Among Older Women With Low-Risk Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Guidelines Committee suggests that the omission of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery can be a reasonable option among older women with low-risk breast cancer (early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, and node-negative) if they are treated with endocrine therapy. However, RT usage in this group of women still exceeds 50%. Conversely, older women tend to forego RT (even when necessary) due to cost, inconvenience, and potential adverse responses associated with RT. Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) change with receipt of RT among older women in the modern era is limited due to the under-representation of this population in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The proposed study aims to examine the associations of RT with HRQOL trajectories as well as survival outcomes among older women with 5-10 years of follow-up. We will also assess whether prediagnosis comorbidity burden influences receipt of RT and whether the associations between RT and HRQOL trajectory and survival outcomes are modified by the comorbidity burden. METHODS: We will use a retrospective cohort study design with the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database linked to the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS). Older women (≥65 years) who were diagnosed with low-risk breast cancer in 1998-2014, received breast-conserving surgery, and participated in MHOS 1998-2016 are eligible for this analysis. The latent class analysis clustering method will be used to identify each patient's prediagnosis comorbidity burden, and HRQOL will be evaluated using the Short Form 36/Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey scales. The inverse-weighted estimates of the probability of treatment will be included to control for treatment selection bias and confounding effects in subsequent analysis. The association of RT with HRQOL trajectory will be evaluated using inverse-weighted multilevel growth mixture models. The inverse-weighted Cox regression model will be used to obtain hazard ratios with 95% CIs for the association of RT with survival outcomes. Differential effects of RT on both outcomes according to comorbidity burden class will also be evaluated. RESULTS: As of October 2020, the study was approved by the institutional review board, and SEER-MHOS data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute. Women with low-risk breast cancer who met inclusion and exclusion criteria have been identified, and prediagnosis comorbidity burden class has been characterized using latent class analysis. Further data analysis will begin in November 2020, and the first manuscript will be submitted in a peer-reviewed journal in February 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This research can potentially improve clinical outcomes of older women with low-risk breast cancer by providing them additional information on the HRQOL trajectories when they make RT treatment decisions. It will facilitate informed, shared treatment decision making and cancer care planning to ultimately improve the HRQOL of older women with breast cancer. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/18056.

Clinicopathological analysis of early-stage breast cancer patients that meet indications for BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early-stage breast cancer patients with indications for breast cancer susceptibility genes 1/2 (BRCA1/2) genetic testing in China. METHODS: Based on the indication criteria for BRCA genetic testing specified in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines in oncology, genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast and ovarian (Version 2. 2019), a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated at Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital between January 2008 and December 2016. Clinicopathological characteristics of all patients were analyzed, and prognoses were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportionate hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 906 early-stage breast cancer patients who had indications for BRCA genetic testing and had complete clinicopathological data and follow-up information were included in the study group, accounting for 34.7% of all breast cancer patients treated in Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital during the study period. Compared with breast cancer patients without indications for BRCA genetic testing, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with indications were not significantly different. In the study group, patients with premenopausal status, high T stage, lymph node positive, estrogen receptor (ER) negative, Ki-67>20% and presence of a vascular tumor thrombus had worse prognosis. There were more family histories of gastrointestinal cancer in patients with related indications than in patients without such indications. CONCLUSIONS: Single-center data showed that more than 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer had indications for BRCA genetic testing. There was no prognostic difference in patients with or without indications for BRCA genetic testing. Premenopausal status, high T stage, lymph node positive, ER negative, Ki-67>20%, and presence of a vascular tumor thrombus were associated with poor prognosis.

Efficacy of zoledronic acid for prevention of bone loss in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy: A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.

Early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients receiving adjuvant therapy suffer from bone loss and increased fracture risk. Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been confirmed to inhibit bone metastasis and improve survival outcomes in early BC postmenopausal patients receiving adjuvant therapy. However, the efficacy of ZA for prevention of adjuvant therapy-induced bone loss from 2 different early BC groups, namely premenopausal and postmenopausal patients, still remain unclear. To obtain detailed characteristics, we performed this meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched. In premenopausal BC patients and postmenopausal BC patients, to assess bone loss, we calculated the weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), total hip (TH) BMD, and femoral neck (FN) BMD in ZA and non-ZA group with follow-up of 12 months. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 7375 patients were included. In a mixed population of early BC patients receiving adjuvant therapy, ZA significantly increased LS BMD (P < 0.00001), TH BMD (P < 0.00001), and FN BMD (P = 0.01) compared with non-ZA group. In premenopausal patient subgroup, LS BMD was greatly higher in patients with ZA compared to controls (0.06 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.08), whereas there were no differences in TH BMD and FN BMD between patients with ZA and controls. In postmenopausal patient subgroup, both LS BMD (0.06 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.07) and TH BMD (0.04 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.03-0.04) were significantly higher in patients with ZA compared to controls, but there was no difference in FN BMD between patients with ZA and controls. To sum up, ZA prevents bone loss in early-stage BC patients receiving adjuvant therapy at different skeletal sites. In premenopausal patients, effectiveness of ZA in prevention of bone loss is confirmed at LS site, but not at TH and FN site. In postmenopausal patients, ZA has a satisfying efficacy for prevention of bone loss at LS and TH site, but not at FN site.

Acceptance of adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations in early-stage hormone-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of systemic chemotherapy in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and Her2-negative breast cancer remains an area of active investigation. The decision to recommend chemotherapy is multifactorial, and some patients decline recommended chemotherapy. We sought to identify patient factors leading to refusal of adjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from National Comprehensive Cancer Network Outcomes database and used to identify patients with primary, unilateral, T1-T2, N0, ER+, Her2-disease diagnosed from 2005-2011. Patient and clinical characteristics were analyzed for associations with physician recommendation for chemotherapy and patient acceptance of chemotherapy. A logistic regression model was used to identify patient and tumor characteristics associated with recommendation for and acceptance of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were identified. Chemotherapy was recommended in 191 patients (58.1%) and not in 138 (41.9%). Young age (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-12.7), large tumor size (6.69, 95% CI: 3.31-13.5), and high Oncotype DX scores (11.2, 95% CI: 4.5-27.9) were more likely to receive a recommendation. About 71 patients (37.1%) refused chemotherapy. Patients younger than age 50 (20.9, 95% CI: 2.5-172.0), larger tumor size (3.4, 95% CI: 1.3-8.7), Oncotype DX score > 31 (31.3, 95% CI: 3.3-295.0), privately insured (8.2, 95% CI: 1.9-34.7), and Hispanic ethnicity (5.2, 95% CI: 1.6-16.8) were more likely to accept chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ER + breast cancer varied by commonly considered factors. Patient acceptance varied by similar factors but was also influenced by race and insurance status. This may be explained by cultural or social factors not well understood or not overcome by physician guidance.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Stage I Breast Cancer: Initial Workup and Surveillance for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Asymptomatic Women.

Women newly diagnosed with stage 1 breast cancer have an early-stage disease that can be effectively treated. Evidence provides little justification for performing imaging to exclude metastasis in asymptomatic women with stage I breast cancer. No differences have been found in survival or quality of life in women regardless of whether they underwent initial workup for metastatic disease. These women generally prefer intensive follow-up to detect an early recurrence. However, survival rates do not differ between women who obtain intensive screening and surveillance, with imaging and laboratory studies, and women who undergo testing only as a result of development of symptoms or findings on clinical examinations. In addition, quality of life is similar for women who undergo intensive surveillance compared with those who do not. American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that annual mammography is the only imaging examination that should be performed to detect a localized breast recurrence in asymptomatic patients. Additional imaging may be needed if the patient has locoregional symptoms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review by the panel include extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. When evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Adjuvant radiation use in older women with early-stage breast cancer at Johns Hopkins.

PURPOSE: In 2004, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines incorporated omission of radiation therapy after breast-conservation surgery in women ≥70 years old with stage I, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who plan to receive endocrine therapy. One study demonstrated wide variation in implementing this change across 13 NCCN institutions. We evaluated the practice pattern at our institution. METHODS: We identified women ≥70 years old treated at our institution from 2009 to 2014. We calculated radiation therapy omission rate in those meeting the guidelines. We explored associations between radiation therapy omission, year of diagnosis, and patient characteristics with Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 667 women met the inclusion criteria, and 117 (18 %) were candidates for radiation therapy omission. Mean age among the 117 was 76.3 years (Range: 70-95). Overall radiation therapy omission rate was 36.8 %, but varied greatly by year of diagnosis (Range: 7.7-54.5 %). This variation persisted after excluding women who did not receive endocrine therapy (Mean: 39.0 %, Range: 0.0-75.0 %). Factors associated with higher radiation therapy omission rates included older age and not having pathological nodal evaluation. The radiation therapy omission rate did not vary by race, tumor type, grade, or size. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the NCCN guideline has not been consistent at our institution. Our data suggest that other tools should be considered to apply the guidelines more consistently. We have implemented a quality improvement protocol that incorporates life expectancy estimate and geriatric assessment in women meeting the NCCN guideline at our institution.

The Results of Chemotherapy with Two Variants of Intravenous CMF in Patients with Early Stage Breast Carcinoma; Does Dose Density Matter?

No direct comparisons can be made in early stages of breast cancer, between the intravenous combinations of: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil; named modified versions of CMF with the classical oral version of CMF. Since these modifications have different dose intensities and densities, the outcomes for their subsequent treatments may be varied, and not produce the same results. Despite that, classical CMF has been commonly replaced with intravenous modifications. This study aimed to assess the results of treatment with two common intravenous modification of CMF chemotherapy; to represent the most effective and successful substitute of classical CMF. Five hundred patients in two groups were eligible to take part in the experiment. For two hundred and twenty-nine patients in the group CMF 1&8, chemotherapy was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days for six cycles consisting of: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 , methotrexate 40 mg/m2 , fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 . In the group CMF 1 which consisted of 271 patients, chemotherapy was administered with all the same drugs and doses, however, it was only administered on day 1 and repeated at 21-day intervals for six cycles. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), the prognostic factors and other probable interventional factors were then compared between the two groups. The 5-year OS rate of 87.5% and 10-year OS rate of 82% in the group CMF 1&8 were statistically significantly better than 5-year OS of 84% and 10-year OS of 61.5% in the group CMF 1 (p = 0.01). The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were 76% and 60% respectively, in the group CMF 1&8 compared with 77% and 54% respectively in the group CMF 1 (p = 0.8). Two groups were comparable regarding their distribution of different prognostic factors and other probable interventional factors. Considering 30% higher dose density of drugs in the protocol of CMF 1&8, the improving outcome can be related to the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy. Therefore, this intravenous modification is the better substitute of classical CMF.

Filling the Gap for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Follow-Up: An Overview for Primary Care Providers.

Earlier detection and newer treatments now make breast cancer highly survivable, and breast cancer survivors are the largest female cancer survivor group in the United States. With earlier detection, more women are being diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and need follow-up care. With the increasing number of breast cancer survivors, there is a projected shortage in the workforce of oncology specialists to care for these women. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that breast cancer follow-up care can be provided by an oncologist or primary care provider, as long as the primary care provider has spoken to the oncologist about appropriate follow-up care. Several studies have shown that primary care providers and oncologists have comparable outcomes for follow-up care of women with early-stage breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) are considered the gold standard for breast cancer treatment and follow-up. These guidelines are clear and straightforward. Using knowledge of the NCCN Guidelines, primary care providers can fill the gap for follow-up care of women with early-stage breast cancer.

Medication use by early-stage breast cancer survivors: a 1-year longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns of medication use by early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) survivors from diagnosis to 1 year post-chemotherapy. METHODS: A single-center longitudinal study was conducted with ESBC patients diagnosed between December 2011 and June 2014. Data on the medication use of individual patients were retrieved from prescription databases, supplemented by records from the National Electronic Health Records. The data covered the period from ESBC diagnosis to 1 year post-chemotherapy. Medication types were classified according to the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, and medication for chronic diseases was created by adapting a list of 20 chronic diseases provided by the U.S. Department of Human and Health Services. RESULTS: Of the 107 patients involved in the study (mean age 51.1 ± 8.4 years; 78.5 % Chinese), 46.7 % manifested non-cancer comorbidities, of which hypertension (24.3 %) was the most prevalent, followed by hyperlipidemia (13.1 %) and diabetes (5.6 %). Calcium channel blockers (12.1 %) and lipid-modifying agents (11.2 %) were the most common chronic medication types used before chemotherapy, and their use persisted during chemotherapy (10.3 and 11.2 %, respectively) and after chemotherapy (11.2 and 13.1 %, respectively). Hormonal therapy was the predominant post-chemotherapy medication (77.6 %). A statistically significant increase (p < 0.0001) was observed in the mean number of chronic disease medication classes prescribed to patients between the pre-chemotherapy (0.53 ± 1.04) and chemotherapy (0.62 ± 1.08) periods and between the chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy (1.63 ± 1.35) periods. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increase in trend of chronic medication usage in breast cancer survivors after cancer treatment. This study provides important insights into the design of medication management programs tailored to this population. Future studies should incorporate a control population to improve the interpretation of study results.

The search for optimal cutoff points for apoptosis and proliferation rate in prognostification of early stage breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines in adjuvant settings.

Cancer growth is determined by the proportion of proliferating to dying cells; thus, the aim of the study was to analyze how proliferation rate and apoptosis level affect disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer (BC) patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. For 172 BC, proliferation rate was investigated by Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI)-assessed immunohistochemically. Apoptosis level was analyzed by apoptotic index (AI) estimated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay. To stratify patients into subgroups with higher and lower DFS and to achieve optimal categorization, optimal cutoff points were searching by minimal P value method. The best separation of DFS curves (P = 0.001) was observed for three categories of AI: (i) AI >1.8 % (DFS = 100 %), (ii) AI ≤0.3 % (DFS = 84.6 %), and (iii) 1.8 % <= AI >0.3 % (DFS = 64.0 %). The highest DFS (86.1 %) was shown for the subgroup with low-proliferating BC (Ki-67 LI ≤18.0 %), intermediate (73.9 %) for patients characterized by Ki-67 LI in the range 18.0-37.0 % and the lowest (60.0 %) for women with fast-proliferating tumors (Ki-67 LI >37.0 %) (P = 0.022). Summarized, minimal P value method allows for optimal separation of survival curves. Apoptosis level and proliferation rate have some prognostic potential for early stage breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines in adjuvant setting, however, as suggested by multivariate analysis, not as independent prognostic factors.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria stage I breast cancer: initial workup and surveillance for local recurrence and distant metastases in asymptomatic women.

Women newly diagnosed with stage 1 breast cancer have an early-stage disease that can be effectively treated. Evidence provides little justification for performing imaging to exclude metastasis in asymptomatic women with stage I breast cancer. No differences have been found in survival or quality of life in women regardless of whether they underwent initial workup for metastatic disease. These women generally prefer intensive follow-up to detect an early recurrence. However, survival rates do not differ between women who obtain intensive screening and surveillance, with imaging and laboratory studies, and women who undergo testing only as a result of development of symptoms or findings on clinical examinations. In addition, quality of life is similar for women who undergo intensive surveillance compared with those who do not. American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that annual mammography is the only imaging examination that should be performed to detect a localized breast recurrence in asymptomatic patients. Additional imaging may be needed if the patient has locoregional symptoms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review by the panel include extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. When evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.